Hinduism Unveiled: Forbidden Images (not safe for work)

Seva Lamberdar wrote:did you miss the following,
https://www.facebook.com/radha.gokhale.73/videos/10205001038682625/

Rashmun wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:did you miss the following,
https://www.facebook.com/radha.gokhale.73/videos/10205001038682625/

your video has zero connection to this thread.

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:did you miss the following,
https://www.facebook.com/radha.gokhale.73/videos/10205001038682625/

your video has zero connection to this thread.

Do you and Singh (in the article) know the difference between an aberration and a general practice / occurrence? These few pictures on the walls of an obscure ancient monument can't be considered as a proof / evidence of general practice of nudity and sex etc. among Hindus long ago. 
Just because someone three hundred years in the future gets hold of a copy of the Playboy magazine from the 1990s showing nude pictures etc. of young girls / women, that won't be considered as the evidence for women everywhere, especially in the U.S., during 1990s living, walking etc. in the nude all the time; and rightly so.

Rashmun wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:did you miss the following,
https://www.facebook.com/radha.gokhale.73/videos/10205001038682625/

your video has zero connection to this thread.

Do you and Singh (in the article) know the difference between an aberration and a general practice / occurrence? These few pictures on the walls of an obscure ancient monument can't be considered as a proof / evidence of general practice of nudity and sex etc. among Hindus long ago. 
Just because someone three hundred years in the future gets hold of a copy of the Playboy magazine from the 1990s showing nude pictures etc. of young girls / women, that won't be considered as the evidence for women everywhere, especially in the U.S., during 1990s living, walking etc. in the nude all the time; and rightly so.

“The poems in The Absent Traveller, written 2,000 years ago, are all about fucking—about what goes on before the act, during the act, and after the act,” says Mehrotra. “Most poems are spoken by women, and they are of all ages, from an ingénue to an ancient crone reminiscing about her past affairs. In one poem an old woman is in a temple, worshipping a stone she says she had once used as a pillow.”
Mehrotra adds, “Temples, then, were also places where you went to have sex, and stone gods, placed sideways, had other functions as well.”

http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/NBAFvOxrFLQKFtvOeoXvPM/Arvind-Krishna-Mehrotra-Allahabads-prodigal-poet.html