ejmers on nate silver

by swapna Fri May 13, 2016 11:45 am

I've never had much interest in nate silver's prognotications, partly because he has no underlying model of elections. he seems to have gone wildly wrong on donny's nomination. that, I suppose, is what happens when one finds weighted averages of data from multiple polls.

here's what the denizens of ejmr think of nate silver's predictions:

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/is-nate-silver-a-better-statistician-than-the-typical-economist

by swapna Fri May 13, 2016 12:07 pm

in ejmr posts, "hrm" stands for "high ranked monkey," ie a product of one of the topmost universities, or a ph.d. in economics from such a university.

by southindian Fri May 13, 2016 12:26 pm

Thomas,

Did you take your morning medications?

Just checking...

by silvermani Fri May 13, 2016 12:58 pm

swapna wrote:I've never had much interest in nate silver's prognotications, partly because he has no underlying model of elections. he seems to have gone wildly wrong on donny's nomination. that, I suppose, is what happens when one finds weighted averages of data from multiple polls.

here's what the denizens of ejmr think of nate silver's predictions:

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/is-nate-silver-a-better-statistician-than-the-typical-economist

What?

by swapna Fri May 13, 2016 1:08 pm

southindian wrote:Thomas,

Did you take your morning medications?

Just checking...

and you your cheevda?

by garam_kuta Fri May 13, 2016 2:12 pm

swapna wrote:
southindian wrote:Thomas,

Did you take your morning medications?

Just checking...
and you your cheevda?

he is just playing you... he knows what's your answer gonna be, yeah? "me, dic action, no! never..." Sad

by swapna Fri May 13, 2016 3:06 pm

silvermani wrote:
swapna wrote:I've never had much interest in nate silver's prognotications, partly because he has no underlying model of elections. he seems to have gone wildly wrong on donny's nomination. that, I suppose, is what happens when one finds weighted averages of data from multiple polls.

here's what the denizens of ejmr think of nate silver's predictions:

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/is-nate-silver-a-better-statistician-than-the-typical-economist

What?

selvamaNi? welcome to our beloved forum! if any post offends you, just say so to charvaka, our beloved admin; he has promised to remove such posts promptly, no matter what your reason.

by garam_kuta Fri May 13, 2016 5:17 pm

swapna wrote:
silvermani wrote:
swapna wrote:I've never had much interest in nate silver's prognotications, partly because he has no underlying model of elections. he seems to have gone wildly wrong on donny's nomination. that, I suppose, is what happens when one finds weighted averages of data from multiple polls.

here's what the denizens of ejmr think of nate silver's predictions:

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/is-nate-silver-a-better-statistician-than-the-typical-economist

What?
selvamaNi? welcome to our beloved forum! if any post offends you, just say so to charvaka, our beloved admin; he has promised to remove such posts promptly, no matter what your reason.

hustling both sides of the street now?

by Sponsored content

ejmers on nate silver

ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver

Re: ejmers on nate silver