Misplaced Priorities: Rs. 225-crore Ram museum being built in Ayodhya

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

You mean, put the belt on and activate kboom to meet 72?

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/rs-225-crore-ram-museum-in-ayodhya/article18476779.ece

Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

if you don't like my posts why not put me on ignore?

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:
Dear Bastard,

How do you try to ignore yourself when you blame yourself for spamming this forum?

LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

if you don't like my posts why not put me on ignore?

Jackass,

You can do the same for other handles.

Easy to say. Right?

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

southindian wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
LOL. Are you suggesting that I am Some Profile?

Nope! 

You are an asshole who spams this place with junk all the time.

Put yourself on ignore.

if you don't like my posts why not put me on ignore?

Jackass,

You can do the same for other handles.

Easy to say. Right?

i am not complaining about your posts. in fact i am amused by them. i consider you a clown whose only purpose on this forum is to provide mirth to others.

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

Did you ask the same question when the government pays for the Haj pilgrimages every year?

<snip>

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

<snip>
BTW, if you want H-M synthesis, preach to the muslim brotherhood about accepting, 'Ishwar Allah tero naam' 'Sab ka maalik ek' etc and not '(only) Allah hu Akbar.' It can be 'Jesus hu akbar', 'Ram hu akbar', etc along with 'allah hu akbar.' 
<snip>

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

<snip>
That said, the govt may ban the export of beef, but should make it available to the consumers within India. One can't impose one's religious preferences on others.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

<snip>
BTW, if you want H-M synthesis, preach to the muslim brotherhood about accepting, 'Ishwar Allah tero naam' 'Sab ka maalik ek' etc and not '(only) Allah hu Akbar.' It can be 'Jesus hu akbar', 'Ram hu akbar', etc along with 'allah hu akbar.' 
<snip>

this does not seem like a sensible idea. the corollary to this idea would be asking Hindus to chant 'Jai Jesus' and 'Jai Allah' along with 'Jai Bajrang Bali', 'Jai Shree Krishna', 'Jai Shree Ram', 'Jai Bholenath', etc.

I would prefer this chanting business to be a private affair of everyone; wearing religion on your sleeve should be uniformly discouraged.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

<snip>
BTW, if you want H-M synthesis, preach to the muslim brotherhood about accepting, 'Ishwar Allah tero naam' 'Sab ka maalik ek' etc and not '(only) Allah hu Akbar.' It can be 'Jesus hu akbar', 'Ram hu akbar', etc along with 'allah hu akbar.' 
<snip>

this does not seem like a sensible idea. the corollary to this idea would be asking Hindus to chant 'Jai Jesus' and 'Jai Allah' along with 'Jai Bajrang Bali', 'Jai Shree Krishna', 'Jai Shree Ram', 'Jai Bholenath', etc.

I would prefer this chanting business to be a private affair of everyone; wearing religion on your sleeve should be uniformly discouraged.

Jeez@your IQ levels! It's not about chanting, stupud! It's about accepting the oneness of god. It's being inclusive, not exclusive. Read my post again and again until you get it. 


I'll tey not to respond to your stupid posts.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:what a waste of money which could have been spent on schools, hospitals, etc.

<snip>
BTW, if you want H-M synthesis, preach to the muslim brotherhood about accepting, 'Ishwar Allah tero naam' 'Sab ka maalik ek' etc and not '(only) Allah hu Akbar.' It can be 'Jesus hu akbar', 'Ram hu akbar', etc along with 'allah hu akbar.' 
<snip>

this does not seem like a sensible idea. the corollary to this idea would be asking Hindus to chant 'Jai Jesus' and 'Jai Allah' along with 'Jai Bajrang Bali', 'Jai Shree Krishna', 'Jai Shree Ram', 'Jai Bholenath', etc.

I would prefer this chanting business to be a private affair of everyone; wearing religion on your sleeve should be uniformly discouraged.

Jeez@your IQ levels! It's not about chanting, stupud! It's about accepting the oneness of god. It's being inclusive, not exclusive. Read my post again and again until you get it. 


I'll tey not to respond to your stupid posts.

do hindus accept that Allah and Jesus are no different than Rama, Krishna, Shiva, etc? They do not. You might, since you claim to be an elevated Advaitin, but the vast majority of hindus do not. Otherwise there would have been statues of Allah and Jesus together with statues of the hindu gods in hindu temples.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:
<snip>
BTW, if you want H-M synthesis, preach to the muslim brotherhood about accepting, 'Ishwar Allah tero naam' 'Sab ka maalik ek' etc and not '(only) Allah hu Akbar.' It can be 'Jesus hu akbar', 'Ram hu akbar', etc along with 'allah hu akbar.' 
<snip>

this does not seem like a sensible idea. the corollary to this idea would be asking Hindus to chant 'Jai Jesus' and 'Jai Allah' along with 'Jai Bajrang Bali', 'Jai Shree Krishna', 'Jai Shree Ram', 'Jai Bholenath', etc.

I would prefer this chanting business to be a private affair of everyone; wearing religion on your sleeve should be uniformly discouraged.

Jeez@your IQ levels! It's not about chanting, stupud! It's about accepting the oneness of god. It's being inclusive, not exclusive. Read my post again and again until you get it. 


I'll tey not to respond to your stupid posts.

do hindus accept that Allah and Jesus are no different than Rama, Krishna, Shiva, etc? They do not. You might, since you claim to be an elevated Advaitin, but the vast majority of hindus do not. Otherwise there would have been statues of Allah and Jesus together with statues of the hindu gods in hindu temples.

You kidding me? I've been to Sai Baba temple last Thursday and ppl there were singing sai bhajans. The bhajans had the names of Rama, Krishna and Allah incorporated in them. The hall full of hindu devotees had no qualms hailing Allah. 
Sufism is pretty popular in my mom's native place and she grew up celebrating Pir festivals and visiting Durgahs.
<snip>

Rashmun wrote:

Please share your views on Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopananda's comments on Sai Baba. The Shankaracharya seems to believe that Sai Baba (and presumably also Sai Baba's disciples) are enemies of Hinduism.

Sharpening his attack on Sai Baba, Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati in Bhopal on Friday released a poster in which Lord Hanuman is shown ‘driving out’ the revered spiritual master with a tree trunk.

In what is being built as the most virulent attack on Sai Baba, Swami Swarupanand Saraswati and his disciples, who are currently in Bhopal said “Sai Baba will be driven out of India to Pakistan in the next three years by the grace of lord Hanuman,” said Ramanand, a disciple of Swami Swaroopanand.

Talking to HT, Swami Swarupanand said the trust formed on the name of Sai was responsible to spoil Hindu dharma in the country. He said Sai Baba was projected superior to lord Hanuman and other Hindu Gods by the trust, which was unacceptable.

“Sai Baba’s real name was Chand Miya who is dead and we treat him as a ghost and not God,” said Swami Swaroopanand.

He also claimed that there were no followers of Sai Baba in the country. People visit Shirdi as they are mean, selfish and only want their wishes to come true.

“I visited several places in the past two months. During this period, not a single follower of Sai came to me to raise objections about my perception about Sai,” he added.

Ramanand said the poster was made on the basis of a dream of a disciple in Nanded district. The disciple dreamt that Lord Hanuman was ‘driving out’ Sai Baba with the help of a tree trunk, he added.

He added that Lord Hanuman has also instructed to build temples near every temple of Sai Baba in India, so that the spirit of Sai Baba can be ‘driven out’ from the country.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Please share your views on Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopananda's comments on Sai Baba. The Shankaracharya seems to believe that Sai Baba (and presumably also Sai Baba's disciples) are enemies of Hinduism.

Sharpening his attack on Sai Baba, Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati in Bhopal on Friday released a poster in which Lord Hanuman is shown ‘driving out’ the revered spiritual master with a tree trunk.

In what is being built as the most virulent attack on Sai Baba, Swami Swarupanand Saraswati and his disciples, who are currently in Bhopal said “Sai Baba will be driven out of India to Pakistan in the next three years by the grace of lord Hanuman,” said Ramanand, a disciple of Swami Swaroopanand.

Talking to HT, Swami Swarupanand said the trust formed on the name of Sai was responsible to spoil Hindu dharma in the country. He said Sai Baba was projected superior to lord Hanuman and other Hindu Gods by the trust, which was unacceptable.

“Sai Baba’s real name was Chand Miya who is dead and we treat him as a ghost and not God,” said Swami Swaroopanand.

He also claimed that there were no followers of Sai Baba in the country. People visit Shirdi as they are mean, selfish and only want their wishes to come true.

“I visited several places in the past two months. During this period, not a single follower of Sai came to me to raise objections about my perception about Sai,” he added.

Ramanand said the poster was made on the basis of a dream of a disciple in Nanded district. The disciple dreamt that Lord Hanuman was ‘driving out’ Sai Baba with the help of a tree trunk, he added.

He added that Lord Hanuman has also instructed to build temples near every temple of Sai Baba in India, so that the spirit of Sai Baba can be ‘driven out’ from the country.

<snip>
As I see it, if one feels the need to follow a guru, it's better to be devoted to a dead one rather than a living one. At least you are assured that the guru can't get into any controversies and have you disillusioned and heartbroken. So following Shirdi Sai baba>following Nityananda or Sri sri Ravishankar or Jaggu Vasudeva, etc.