Hydrogen vs. Electric vs. Natural gas

Hellsangel wrote:When are you buying your BMW i3, your Holiness?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:When are you buying your BMW i3, your Holiness?

My finances are not in good shape and I may soon be dowgrading to a moped... (I saw a bicycle fitted with a little gas engine you find in lawn edgers.)

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

are you removing the post script or do you plan to continue making a fool of yourself?

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

are you removing the post script or do you plan to continue making a fool of yourself?

go fuck yourself

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

are you removing the post script or do you plan to continue making a fool of yourself?

go fuck yourself

back to Fisherman Language? Are you embarrassed now that your obsession with me has been brought to the attention of other posters?

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

are you removing the post script or do you plan to continue making a fool of yourself?

go fuck yourself

back to Fisherman Language? Are you embarrassed now that your obsession with me has been brought to the attention of other posters?

Propagandhi711 wrote:

indophile wrote:I thought BMW makes bikes too. 
Back to your question. Natural gas technology is already mature. It puts out very little pollution, and gas is abundant.
Hydrogen is far out.
Electric is great, if only it can match the IC technology in acceleration, range, etc.
Therefore, I vote for gas, I mean the the one used for fuel.

tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

Propagandhi711 wrote:tesla model S beats any car out there hands down in acceleration, quality, safety etc. range, not so much. and the germans are working on competing vehicles. nat gas and hydrogen are not desirable due to safety concerns.

noisy_dravidfan wrote:tonnage hydrogen is not produced by electrolysis. that's an economic loser. it's produced by a process called steam-methane reformation.