Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:59 am

Actually, Bukhari is not a proper Imam according to iSlamic tradition. Bin Lavden, if alive, would have opposed his Imam-hood.

He wants (just like what his father did) to appoint his son as the next Imam of Jama Masjid in Delhi. This is like how the "royal" families in Jordan and S Arabia behave (not really sanctioned by the 7th century book). In fact, the feud (violence, really) between Sunni and Shiia is on a similar issue. the agents in India of ISIS, if sincere, should first capture the Imam and behead him the halal way for spreading falsehood.

Bukhari was boasting yesterday that he would be inviting Sharif and not Modi to anointing his son as the next Imam. This is not really a big deal as the average Muslim in India doesn't care much for this Imam. However, just like whast China has done in the case of the Dalai Lama, India should install a new Imam, separate from the Bukhari family. However, they should ask Muslims to democratically elect the guy for a 5 year term. This way, Muslims, and not the govt, will be dealing with what to do with Bukhari.

The other thing that is of interest is this: Bukhari often talks of Sikularism and advises his Bakras to vote for a Sikular party in elections. He met Sonia before the last election. By inviting a Paki PM and not a Kafir PM to an event in India, the Imam is showing how fukular he is about Sikularism.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/inviting-sharif-not-modi-to-jama-masjid-shahi-imam/article1-1280609.aspx

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:54 am

Good...Saves Modi a reason to skip the Skull-cap walla's marriage.

What more evidence one needs to convince the nature of the 5th columnists.

by Seva Lamberdar Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:01 pm

Just imagine a Korean community leader residing in New York city inviting Kim Jong-un (North Korean leader) to his son's initiation ceremony while leaving out Obama (American Pres.).

by rawemotions Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:29 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Actually, Bukhari is not a proper Imam according to iSlamic tradition. Bin Lavden, if alive, would have opposed his Imam-hood.

He wants (just like what his father did) to appoint his son as the next Imam of Jama Masjid in Delhi. This is like how the "royal" families in Jordan and S Arabia behave (not really sanctioned by the 7th century book). In fact, the feud (violence, really) between Sunni and Shiia is on a similar issue. the agents in India of ISIS, if sincere, should first capture the Imam and behead him the halal way for spreading falsehood.

Bukhari was boasting yesterday that he would be inviting Sharif and not Modi to anointing his son as the next Imam. This is not really a big deal as the average Muslim in India doesn't care much for this Imam. However, just like whast China has done in the case of the Dalai Lama, India should install a new Imam, separate from the Bukhari family. However, they should ask Muslims to democratically elect the guy for a 5 year term. This way, Muslims, and not the govt, will be dealing with what to do with Bukhari.

The other thing that is of interest is this: Bukhari often talks of Sikularism and advises his Bakras to vote for a Sikular party in elections. He met Sonia before the last election. By inviting a Paki PM and not a Kafir PM to an event in India, the Imam is showing how fukular he is about Sikularism.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/inviting-sharif-not-modi-to-jama-masjid-shahi-imam/article1-1280609.aspx

What else is expected from a Political Islamist ? The media should ask him questions about his Political Islamism, that directly conflicts with constitution of India.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:48 pm

rawemotions wrote:
What else is expected from a Political Islamist ? The media should ask him questions about his Political Islamism, that directly conflicts with constitution of India.

I disagree with your categorization. These are Jihadi iSlamists. Political Islamists are namesake islamis and sing islami songs for votes wonly.... Omar Abdullah, Gulam Nabi Azad, and even Azam Khan are political islamists. Islam for the sake of power. Bukhari is a Jihadi Islami - he wants power to convert and propagate 3L Jihad.

The rest are all just Islamis.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:52 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Actually, Bukhari is not a proper Imam according to iSlamic tradition. Bin Lavden, if alive, would have opposed his Imam-hood.

He wants (just like what his father did)
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/inviting-sharif-not-modi-to-jama-masjid-shahi-imam/article1-1280609.aspx

*****
“It is my personal function and who is to be invited is up to me. I cannot relate to him as he has never made attempt to reach out to Muslims.”

When asked if he thinks that inviting PM Nawaz Sharif and ignoring PM Modi will help build a wrong perception about Indian Muslims, he said, “It is my personal choice and the issue must not be politicised.”

REALLY ? Why the fyuck this Kulla Chief is inviting all the HEADS of Governments ? Hope Modi ji sends out a message to all HEADS of States not to act like the Chief Kulla's tail.

by Sponsored content

Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader

Re: Bakri Imam invites Paki PM to his son's appointment as the next Bakri leader