Clarification on privacy policy
+7
goodcitizn
truthbetold
southindian
nevada
confuzzled dude
MaxEntropy_Man
Idéfix
11 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
i change opinions based on my personal judgements; not on tribal loyalty or mutual enmity or flattery or friendship or kith kin equations like you. are you a gay bastard?
in the instant case, idefix gets a clean chit from me and i have mentioned it upthread and regardless of what further defence he submits. my opinion of him will not change. but i am annoyed that he is not accepting his nitpicking mistake. i do not know if it was a mistake by him and will not know till i hear from him.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
No. This is the sequence of events:bye wrote:2) time and again you have had to step in to delete ff's name at his behest (empowering you) before you inserted your name in the banned list.
- Repeated violations of my privacy
- After several warnings, the violations continued requiring me to regularly login as admin to correct those violations
- I sought advice from Forumotion on how to deal with this, and they suggested the blocked words list as a tool
- Added some words to the blocked words list to stop the violations
- On the advice of Forumotion, decided not to make a public statement about item 4, because saying so would have prompted experiments with ways to get around the system, which would have negated the effectiveness of the method
- A few months later, added the edit on the privacy policy once members had figured out that some words were blocked
- Several months later (i.e. about a week ago), received a request from a poster to delete several old posts containing violations of their privacy
When I took step 4 many months ago, I had no request from any other poster other than myself that had required multiple, frequent admin interventions. The request regarding item 7 came in many months later. Until item 7 happened, I had no power as admin to delete any words related to that request. Until those words were part of frequent and repeated violations -- which you are guilty of now -- I did not have the power to add any of those words to the blocked list.
The only action here that I had (and still have) mixed feelings about was item 5. It goes against my natural inclination, and the only reason I went with the advice from Forumotion was that I did not have the time then to actively monitor new variations of violations (e.g. "n a m e" or "na me" for "name") and add them to the blocked list. If I had the time to do things differently, I would have proactively disclosed the use of the blocked words list feature and kept adding any variants that violators might have experimented with.,
There does not need to be a request for adding words to the blocked list. Members just need to send a PM (or post on the admin requests thread) to request deletions of privacy violations. if I receive multiple, frequent requests regarding the same words then I may choose to add them to the blocked list, depending on how many admin interventions I had to make to correct violations featuring those words.bye wrote:not power enough to "take action?" does your edit specifically state that you have to be informed via pm (as it does for the other case) to bring it to your "notice?" if you intend to nitpick, did you write a pm to yourself before banning mention of your personal details? and, in any case, how could we have brought it to your notice between your creation of a banned list and your edit?
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Idéfix wrote:No. This is the sequence of events:bye wrote:2) time and again you have had to step in to delete ff's name at his behest (empowering you) before you inserted your name in the banned list.
- Repeated violations of my privacy
- After several warnings, the violations continued requiring me to regularly login as admin to correct those violations
- I sought advice from Forumotion on how to deal with this, and they suggested the blocked words list as a tool
- Added some words to the blocked words list to stop the violations
- On the advice of Forumotion, decided not to make a public statement about item 4, because saying so would have prompted experiments with ways to get around the system, which would have negated the effectiveness of the method
- A few months later, added the edit on the privacy policy once members had figured out that some words were blocked
- Several months later (i.e. about a week ago), received a request from a poster to delete several old posts containing violations of their privacy
When I took step 4 many months ago, I had no request from any other poster other than myself that had required multiple, frequent admin interventions. The request regarding item 7 came in many months later. Until item 7 happened, I had no power as admin to delete any words related to that request. Until those words were part of frequent and repeated violations -- which you are guilty of now -- I did not have the power to add any of those words to the blocked list.
The only action here that I had (and still have) mixed feelings about was item 5. It goes against my natural inclination, and the only reason I went with the advice from Forumotion was that I did not have the time then to actively monitor new variations of violations (e.g. "n a m e" or "na me" for "name") and add them to the blocked list. If I had the time to do things differently, I would have proactively disclosed the use of the blocked words list feature and kept adding any variants that violators might have experimented with.,There does not need to be a request for adding words to the blocked list. Members just need to send a PM (or post on the admin requests thread) to request deletions of privacy violations. if I receive multiple, frequent requests regarding the same words then I may choose to add them to the blocked list, depending on how many admin interventions I had to make to correct violations featuring those words.bye wrote:not power enough to "take action?" does your edit specifically state that you have to be informed via pm (as it does for the other case) to bring it to your "notice?" if you intend to nitpick, did you write a pm to yourself before banning mention of your personal details? and, in any case, how could we have brought it to your notice between your creation of a banned list and your edit?
your explanation makes perfect sense if you agree that you deleted flimflam's name in posts (upon appeals not initiated by the affected party) before drafting the original privacy policy?
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
I don't recall doing this. If I had done this, I wouldn't have had to fix as many old posts related to item 7 above as I have had to in the last few days. If you have a specific instance in mind, remind me.bye wrote:your explanation makes perfect sense if you agree that you deleted flimflam's name in posts (upon appeals not initiated by the affected party) before drafting the original privacy policy?
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Idéfix wrote:I don't recall doing this. If I had done this, I wouldn't have had to fix as many old posts related to item 7 above as I have had to in the last few days. If you have a specific instance in mind, remind me.bye wrote:your explanation makes perfect sense if you agree that you deleted flimflam's name in posts (upon appeals not initiated by the affected party) before drafting the original privacy policy?
fair enough. <3 you. bye.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
ah, one question. have i ever won a debate with you? it is important lol.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
bye wrote:
fair enough. <3 you. bye.
is that a pair of gravity-defying testicles floating horizontally? yours?
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
geriatric douchebag,
you remind me of a junkyard dog that's trying to get in on the action between a leopard and hyena barking furiously at the edges. neither are paying attention but sooner or later you'll get bitten and will run away crying like a bitch
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
i may read your post if your writing is of higher quality. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
geriatric douchebag,
you remind me of a junkyard dog that's trying to get in on the action between a leopard and hyena barking furiously at the edges. neither are paying attention but sooner or later you'll get bitten and will run away crying like a bitch
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:i may read your post if your writing is of higher quality. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
geriatric douchebag,
you remind me of a junkyard dog that's trying to get in on the action between a leopard and hyena barking furiously at the edges. neither are paying attention but sooner or later you'll get bitten and will run away crying like a bitch
if you didn't have a broke dick, your exwife may not have left you for the neighbor. bye.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
if you had testicles, vaaNi may shave her legs to please you, and you may not need to complain pathetically about them in public chat rooms. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:i may read your post if your writing is of higher quality. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.bye wrote:
i trust you. you are a good man.
geriatric douchebag,
you remind me of a junkyard dog that's trying to get in on the action between a leopard and hyena barking furiously at the edges. neither are paying attention but sooner or later you'll get bitten and will run away crying like a bitch
if you didn't have a broke dick, your exwife may not have left you for the neighbor. bye.
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
I remember threads where I came around to your point of view, sometimes after starting elsewhere.bye wrote:ah, one question. have i ever won a debate with you? it is important lol.
Idéfix- Posts : 8808
Join date : 2012-04-26
Location : Berkeley, CA
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
ok. <3. i am left flattered.Idéfix wrote:I remember threads where I came around to your point of view, sometimes after starting elsewhere.bye wrote:ah, one question. have i ever won a debate with you? it is important lol.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:if you had testicles, vaaNi may shave her legs to please you, and you may not need to complain pathetically about them in public chat rooms. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:i may read your post if your writing is of higher quality. good bye.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:
hahaha, just a while back, he was a liar and a bastard! there's only one thing he is, to you and most people here: a v.v.i.p., and that's because you're traditionally enslaved indians.
geriatric douchebag,
you remind me of a junkyard dog that's trying to get in on the action between a leopard and hyena barking furiously at the edges. neither are paying attention but sooner or later you'll get bitten and will run away crying like a bitch
if you didn't have a broke dick, your exwife may not have left you for the neighbor. bye.
if you didnt bath naked with your d and s when they were children, gautham might have grown up to be someone with ambition as opposed to be a lazy bum drifting through life as he currently is and mallika might not have felt the need to put on her knee pads to service a northindian muslim ewweryyyday & twice on sunday. bye.
edit: and if you want to see my testicles, ask mallika to take a HD picture. you can see the marks on her forehead and chin
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
D035 @ny0n3 el53 on th1s f0rum know 2 type lik3 th!5?
What is the point in banning certain words and how is it possible to maintain the ban?
What is the point in banning certain words and how is it possible to maintain the ban?
SomeProfile- Posts : 1863
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
hahaha, that phrase in your first sentence - "arse pureed to a fine pulp" - was memorable when i first wrote it some years ago in a response to you, and it remains so now, doesn't it? does it still hurt? your bringing it up again, when the pain may have been subsiding, is a testimony to your intelligence.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
In this thread: Rashmunni is fantasizing about someone's throbbing head! What a Doucheman!
SomeProfile- Posts : 1863
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
hahaha, it's the tropical forest that's standing in the way of penetration.
michelle2- Posts : 481
Join date : 2013-11-12
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
SomeProfile wrote:In this thread: Rashmunni is fantasizing about someone's throbbing head! What a Doucheman!
Some Poopile with his anus full of piles was appealing to all posters to ignore me after he got his ass handed back to him when he dared to pick up a fight with me. Now this hypocrite is retracting on his own advice and essentially telling me that he would again like to receive a thrashing from me. Is Some Poopile a masochist? Does he enjoy getting kicked around?
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
michelle2 wrote:hahaha, that phrase in your first sentence - "arse pureed to a fine pulp" - was memorable when i first wrote it some years ago in a response to you, and it remains so now, doesn't it? does it still hurt? your bringing it up again, when the pain may have been subsiding, is a testimony to your intelligence.Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
you are a legend in your own mind, when you arent selling math tuition lessons to make ends meet.
mallika bobbing on her northindian muslim's penis is a testimony to your childhood abuse, isn't it? does it rankle now knowing things could have been different if only...? while the pain may be subsiding, the knowledge of what may have been must run deep. no?
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
douchemun is applying soothing paste to phlegmy's flaring hemorroids as he likes to do these days.
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Propagandhi711 wrote:Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
douchemun is applying soothing paste to phlegmy's flaring hemorroids as he likes to do these days.
Even JFK used to complain of a throbbing headache if he had not had sex for more than three days. As an old friend I would like to see a quick end to Propa's misery.
Guest- Guest
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:michelle2 wrote:propa, did i upset you?
btw, it's "if you didn't bathe...," not "if you didn't bath..."
and it's "an HD picture," not "a HD picture."
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
douchemun is applying soothing paste to phlegmy's flaring hemorroids as he likes to do these days.
Even JFK used to complain of a throbbing headache if he had not had sex for more than three days. As an old friend I would like to see a quick end to Propa's misery
when is malini arriving at dfw airport?
Propagandhi711- Posts : 6941
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Clarification on privacy policy
Propagandhi711 wrote:Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:Rashmun wrote:Propagandhi711 wrote:
phlegmy, is your ass, sorry "arse" pureed to a fine pulp now? are you butt hurt? we all know correcting inconsequential spellings is a reflexive defensive mechanism of yours when you're butt hurt...
Propa is in an ugly frame of mind since he has not had any sex for more than two weeks. Propa is experiencing a throbbing pain in his head because of this reason.
douchemun is applying soothing paste to phlegmy's flaring hemorroids as he likes to do these days.
Even JFK used to complain of a throbbing headache if he had not had sex for more than three days. As an old friend I would like to see a quick end to Propa's misery
when is malini arriving at dfw airport?
Have you now resorted to stalking the girlfriends of other posters on the forum? Are you that desperate?
Guest- Guest
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» SuCH privacy policy
» Does the SuCH privacy policy need to change?
» On economic policy and foreign policy there is no major difference between Narendra Modi and the Congress
» A clarification
» A clarification
» Does the SuCH privacy policy need to change?
» On economic policy and foreign policy there is no major difference between Narendra Modi and the Congress
» A clarification
» A clarification
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|