Good Terrorist and Bad Terrorist

Kinnera wrote:The horrific bombings of the school children triggered the recent daily perusal of The Dawn. It's very interesting to see Pak's reaction to it. Why Merlot, you seem to be very uncomfortable about the whole thing.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:The horrific bombings of the school children triggered the recent daily perusal of The Dawn. It's very interesting to see Pak's reaction to it. Why Merlot, you seem to be very uncomfortable about the whole thing.

Yes Kinny, that's how the slide into dangerous ideologies begins. When innocent minds get curious and start reading subversive literature. From there, the slippery slope to becoming a jihadist mole is a quick, short one. So yes, I worry for you and I also worry for Modiji. With jihadist moles among his groupies, it can't be a very secure feeling...

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:The horrific bombings of the school children triggered the recent daily perusal of The Dawn. It's very interesting to see Pak's reaction to it. Why Merlot, you seem to be very uncomfortable about the whole thing.

Yes Kinny, that's how the slide into dangerous ideologies begins. When innocent minds get curious and start reading subversive literature. From there, the slippery slope to becoming a jihadist mole is a quick, short one. So yes, I worry for you and I also worry for Modiji. With jihadist moles among his groupies, it can't be a very secure feeling...

I thought you guys are more worried about the chaddi moles rather than the jihadist moles. chaddi moles > jihadist moles anyday, no?

'>' = more dangerous.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:The horrific bombings of the school children triggered the recent daily perusal of The Dawn. It's very interesting to see Pak's reaction to it. Why Merlot, you seem to be very uncomfortable about the whole thing.

Yes Kinny, that's how the slide into dangerous ideologies begins. When innocent minds get curious and start reading subversive literature. From there, the slippery slope to becoming a jihadist mole is a quick, short one. So yes, I worry for you and I also worry for Modiji. With jihadist moles among his groupies, it can't be a very secure feeling...

I thought you guys are more worried about the chaddi moles rather than the jihadist moles. chaddi moles > jihadist moles anyday, no?

'>' = more dangerous.

Nah. Chaddis are limpwristed aloo aloo eaters. To become dangerous, they need to heed Savarkar and Ashdoc and eat more goat. Lots more goat.

In any event, my worries are on behalf of Modiji. He fears jihadist moles more than anything else.

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:The horrific bombings of the school children triggered the recent daily perusal of The Dawn. It's very interesting to see Pak's reaction to it. Why Merlot, you seem to be very uncomfortable about the whole thing.

Yes Kinny, that's how the slide into dangerous ideologies begins. When innocent minds get curious and start reading subversive literature. From there, the slippery slope to becoming a jihadist mole is a quick, short one. So yes, I worry for you and I also worry for Modiji. With jihadist moles among his groupies, it can't be a very secure feeling...

I thought you guys are more worried about the chaddi moles rather than the jihadist moles. chaddi moles > jihadist moles anyday, no?

'>' = more dangerous.

Nah. Chaddis are limpwristed aloo aloo eaters. To become dangerous, they need to heed Savarkar and Ashdoc and eat more goat. Lots more goat.

In any event, my worries are on behalf of Modiji. He fears jihadist moles more than anything else.

He's on line with most world leaders and the majority of world population and rightfully so, no?  With Pakistan as the neighbor, who wouldn't?

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Yes Kinny, that's how the slide into dangerous ideologies begins. When innocent minds get curious and start reading subversive literature. From there, the slippery slope to becoming a jihadist mole is a quick, short one. So yes, I worry for you and I also worry for Modiji. With jihadist moles among his groupies, it can't be a very secure feeling...

I thought you guys are more worried about the chaddi moles rather than the jihadist moles. chaddi moles > jihadist moles anyday, no?

'>' = more dangerous.

Nah. Chaddis are limpwristed aloo aloo eaters. To become dangerous, they need to heed Savarkar and Ashdoc and eat more goat. Lots more goat.

In any event, my worries are on behalf of Modiji. He fears jihadist moles more than anything else.

He's on line with most world leaders and the majority of world population and rightfully so, no?  With Pakistan as the neighbor, who wouldn't?

The difference is that chaddis see jihadis everywhere. Anyone who disagrees with them must be a jihadist. That scarediness is unmatched in the world. The limpwristedness is truly beyond compare.

Kinnera wrote:

PS: Glad you are not worried about the chaddies. I thought you were shit scared of them

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

PS: Glad you are not worried about the chaddies. I thought you were shit scared of them

Worried about chaddies? Haha. Not at all. They do get in the way but peeling one off a willing hip takes no more than a second.

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

PS: Glad you are not worried about the chaddies. I thought you were shit scared of them

Worried about chaddies? Haha. Not at all. They do get in the way but peeling one off a willing hip takes no more than a second.

If you are not, then leave the chaddies and Modi aside. What makes you think that Pakistan courts which granted bail to the mastermind of a horrific terrorist attacks in a neighboring country which killed 166 innocents has the resolve to fight terrorism? (That too after they had a similar kind in their own land? No lessons learned?)

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

PS: Glad you are not worried about the chaddies. I thought you were shit scared of them

Worried about chaddies? Haha. Not at all. They do get in the way but peeling one off a willing hip takes no more than a second.

If you are not, then leave the chaddies and Modi aside. What makes you think that Pakistan courts which granted bail to the mastermind of a horrific terrorist attacks in a neighboring country which killed 166 innocents has the resolve to fight terrorism? (That too after they had a similar kind in their own land? No lessons learned?)

Oh you'll have to pose that koschen to the various Paki experts here: Upps aunty, Rawmotions etc who have spent a lifetime studying that country. My own uninformed take is that the prosecution was a sham and any self-respecting court would have trashed it.

Kinnera wrote:


A judge in Islamabad's anti-terror court last week had granted bail to Lakhvi, accused for the siege in India's commercial capital that left 166 people dead and was blamed on the banned Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-i-Taiba (LT).
The bail decision had triggered a furious response from New Delhi and Pakistani prosecutors had swiftly announced they would appeal against it.
The challenge was due to be filed on Monday but state prosecutor Mohammad Azhar Chaudhry told AFP he had been unable to proceed.
“I have not yet received a copy of the court (bail) order, which is essential to complete legal formalities,” he told AFP.


Ps: Pakistan will remain Pakistan forever!

Kris wrote:

Kinnera wrote:


A judge in Islamabad's anti-terror court last week had granted bail to Lakhvi, accused for the siege in India's commercial capital that left 166 people dead and was blamed on the banned Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-i-Taiba (LT).
The bail decision had triggered a furious response from New Delhi and Pakistani prosecutors had swiftly announced they would appeal against it.
The challenge was due to be filed on Monday but state prosecutor Mohammad Azhar Chaudhry told AFP he had been unable to proceed.
“I have not yet received a copy of the court (bail) order, which is essential to complete legal formalities,” he told AFP.


Ps: Pakistan will remain Pakistan forever!

>>>Of course! Even this appeals charade is probably a façade, considering even worthies like Hillary are calling Pakistan on its duplicity. Rest assured that the world's attention will turn elsewhere and Pakistan will go back to the usual paradigm i.e. atrocities against Hindu infidels don't matter and terrorists will be welcome. India is wasting its breath expecting a serious response.

rawemotions wrote:

Kris wrote:

Kinnera wrote:


A judge in Islamabad's anti-terror court last week had granted bail to Lakhvi, accused for the siege in India's commercial capital that left 166 people dead and was blamed on the banned Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-i-Taiba (LT).
The bail decision had triggered a furious response from New Delhi and Pakistani prosecutors had swiftly announced they would appeal against it.
The challenge was due to be filed on Monday but state prosecutor Mohammad Azhar Chaudhry told AFP he had been unable to proceed.
“I have not yet received a copy of the court (bail) order, which is essential to complete legal formalities,” he told AFP.


Ps: Pakistan will remain Pakistan forever!

>>>Of course! Even this appeals charade is probably a façade, considering even worthies like Hillary are calling Pakistan on its duplicity. Rest assured that the world's attention will turn elsewhere and Pakistan will go back to the usual paradigm i.e. atrocities against Hindu infidels don't matter and terrorists will be welcome. India is wasting its breath expecting a serious response.

Yes! US is now leveraged in Afghanistan. Recent events (Army Chief's Visit to US) has laid the groundwork for a new engagement with Pakistan. $1 billion given recently and their joint efforts in Afghanistan (to rehabilitate Taliban) are all proofs of new engagement. When US is leveraged, Pakistan tests the waters by doing things inimical to India, to confirm the limits of american response, knowing well that US wont respond for incidents not affecting US.

This happened in the recent attack in J&K, a week after the US-Pakistan engagement, 
where US refused to blame the attack on Foreign infiltrators from Pakistan. 

India should expect much more tests from Pakistan in the immediate future.