the worst cuisines in the world

Propagandhi711 wrote:nobodygivesashit.com

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their our food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  as they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one judge should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders, eh?

geez.. I forgot you two douche sistahs have your own scale in judging with your err.."logic"...ah! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

garam_kuta wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their our food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  as they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one judge should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders, eh?

geez.. I forgot you two douche sistahs have your own scale in judging with your err.."logic"...ah! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  and they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders.

geez.. I forgot the douche sistahs have their own scale in judging with their own err.."logic"  and Oh! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

swapna wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:nobodygivesashit.com

youjustdid @tyrelevel.com

Propagandhi711 wrote:

swapna wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:nobodygivesashit.com

youjustdid @tyrelevel.com

eatsoftfoodsandpoopinyourpants.com

swapna wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

swapna wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:nobodygivesashit.com

youjustdid @tyrelevel.com

eatsoftfoodsandpoopinyourpants.com

yearnforunknownwomenandspill.com

swapna wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  and they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders.

geez.. I forgot the douche sistahs have their own scale in judging with their own err.."logic"  and Oh! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

ah, I see it now. you set your sight on an iit, and ended up a b.sc. in biology? hence the anger? there are at least two other people here who are angry and frustrated for the same reason. both are tamil brahmins!

why would you be dissatisfied with a career in biology? you merely wanted a secure career in which you could earn a comfortable living; you don't care where your talents lie, and what's intellectually stimulating, do you? 

you should be grateful that your secure career allowed  you to invest in a family carrom board, and enjoy sedentary leisure-time activities such as passionately discussing cricket, watching tamil movies - "athaan, athaan! anbae, anbae!" - set in chennai, with sivaji ganesan dressed in a dinner jacket; and of course, playing carrom.

I note that the information content of biology is more suited to your taste. in biology, you learnt about women's body parts, especially the vagina, whose vulgar, tamil name you routinely used as an appellation for males you dislike, just as tyre-level seetharamayya uses its crude, english equivalent for nearly all women. (you two should get together and discuss your p's and c's.)

didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives, "cleverly" attributiing it to me? exciting, wasn't it?

sadly, no more "puNs" or the unrestricted use of the northpeepal's "mc" and "bc" from you after the iyengar slapped you! does it still hurt? your consolation should be that he did so before he knew that you are a tamil brahmin. you and the iyengar still need to learn that a crass tamil brahmin is just crass.

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  and they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders.

geez.. I forgot the douche sistahs have their own scale in judging with their own err.."logic"  and Oh! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

ah, I see it now. you set your sight on an iit, and ended up a b.sc. in biology? hence the anger? there are at least two other people here who are angry and frustrated for the same reason. both are tamil brahmins!

why would you be dissatisfied with a career in biology? you merely wanted a secure career in which you could earn a comfortable living; you don't care where your talents lie, and what's intellectually stimulating, do you? 

you should be grateful that your secure career allowed  you to invest in a family carrom board, and enjoy sedentary leisure-time activities such as passionately discussing cricket, watching tamil movies - "athaan, athaan! anbae, anbae!" - set in chennai, with sivaji ganesan dressed in a dinner jacket; and of course, playing carrom.

I note that the information content of biology is more suited to your taste. in biology, you learnt about women's body parts, especially the vagina, whose vulgar, tamil name you routinely used as an appellation for males you dislike, just as tyre-level seetharamayya uses its crude, english equivalent for nearly all women. (you two should get together and discuss your p's and c's.)

didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives, "cleverly" attributiing it to me? exciting, wasn't it?

sadly, no more "puNs" or the unrestricted use of the northpeepal's "mc" and "bc" from you after the iyengar slapped you! does it still hurt? your consolation should be that he did so before he knew that you are a tamil brahmin. you and the iyengar still need to learn that a crass tamil brahmin is just crass.

hahaha! such a fossil you are?

"didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives" wtf? where? show me one post where there is even a hint of such depraved perversions that you have confessed to, many times; with which propa humiliated you a zillion times. [b]வெறும் கையிலே மல்லிகயை முழம் போட்டவன்தானே நீ! punny, isn't it? - in your language, a cheap twat of a liar!

who is that iyengar that all of a sudden you suck up to? why? and slapped me? mbwahahaha  you sistahs are both like as they say "subjects in a course in clinical psychology. The conduct that you do, literally, and you accuse others of doing"

சப்..சப்..சப்..சப்புனா..only with you..you are so special, na? you are such a 'curiosity', I mean, clinically speaking..and we (me and the 'íyengar') are not the only one, na? apparently, all others as well. at least, I started whipping you only after you started abusing my handle, remember?

bite me again, please!

Rashmun wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:...among developed countries, that is.

the popular opinion among ejmers seems to be: the cuisines (if any) of

australia, the scandinavian countries, the u.k., the netherlands, and the u.s.a.

http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/developed-country-with-worst-cuisine-1

these opinions have considerable validity because ph.d. students in  u.s. economics departments come from nearly all across the world.

australia, according to more than one opinion, has no cuisine.

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  and they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders.

geez.. I forgot the douche sistahs have their own scale in judging with their own err.."logic"  and Oh! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

ah, I see it now. you set your sight on an iit, and ended up a b.sc. in biology? hence the anger? there are at least two other people here who are angry and frustrated for the same reason. both are tamil brahmins!

why would you be dissatisfied with a career in biology? you merely wanted a secure career in which you could earn a comfortable living; you don't care where your talents lie, and what's intellectually stimulating, do you? 

you should be grateful that your secure career allowed  you to invest in a family carrom board, and enjoy sedentary leisure-time activities such as passionately discussing cricket, watching tamil movies - "athaan, athaan! anbae, anbae!" - set in chennai, with sivaji ganesan dressed in a dinner jacket; and of course, playing carrom.

I note that the information content of biology is more suited to your taste. in biology, you learnt about women's body parts, especially the vagina, whose vulgar, tamil name you routinely used as an appellation for males you dislike, just as tyre-level seetharamayya uses its crude, english equivalent for nearly all women. (you two should get together and discuss your p's and c's.)

didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives, "cleverly" attributiing it to me? exciting, wasn't it?

sadly, no more "puNs" or the unrestricted use of the northpeepal's "mc" and "bc" from you after the iyengar slapped you! does it still hurt? your consolation should be that he did so before he knew that you are a tamil brahmin. you and the iyengar still need to learn that a crass tamil brahmin is just crass.

hahaha! such a fossil you are..

"didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives" wtf? where? show me one post where there is even a hint of such depraved perversions that you have confessed to, many times; with which propa humiliated you a zillion times. [b]வெறும் கையிலே மல்லிகயை முழம் போட்டவன்தானே நீ! punny, isn't it? - in your language, a cheap twat of a liar!

who is that iyengar that all of a sudden you suck up to? why? and slapped me? mbwahahaha  you sistahs are both like as they say "subjects in a course in clinical psychology. The conduct that you do, literally, and you accuse others of doing"

சப்..சப்..சப்..சப்புனா..only with you..you are so special, na? you are such a 'curiosity', I mean, clinically speaking..and we (me and the 'íyengar') are not the only one, na? apparently, all others as well. at least, I started whipping you only after you started abusing my handle, remember?

bite me again, please!

garam_kuta wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

swapna wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:

brilliant! absolutely brilliant!!! - globally, we all have the same ligand affinity, selectivity, sensitivity, density and distribution of olfactory receptors, and identical conditioning in their food habits - that's why when you have more than one judge in food/cooking competitions, you don't see them expressing varied opinions, hahaha  and they all taste one and the same dish preparation. just one should do, other judges are redundant, one wonders.

geez.. I forgot the douche sistahs have their own scale in judging with their own err.."logic"  and Oh! i get it...yeah the PhD ones are experts in judging as they are 'scientifically trained' in economics

ah, I see it now. you set your sight on an iit, and ended up a b.sc. in biology? hence the anger? there are at least two other people here who are angry and frustrated for the same reason. both are tamil brahmins!

why would you be dissatisfied with a career in biology? you merely wanted a secure career in which you could earn a comfortable living; you don't care where your talents lie, and what's intellectually stimulating, do you? 

you should be grateful that your secure career allowed  you to invest in a family carrom board, and enjoy sedentary leisure-time activities such as passionately discussing cricket, watching tamil movies - "athaan, athaan! anbae, anbae!" - set in chennai, with sivaji ganesan dressed in a dinner jacket; and of course, playing carrom.

I note that the information content of biology is more suited to your taste. in biology, you learnt about women's body parts, especially the vagina, whose vulgar, tamil name you routinely used as an appellation for males you dislike, just as tyre-level seetharamayya uses its crude, english equivalent for nearly all women. (you two should get together and discuss your p's and c's.)

didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives, "cleverly" attributiing it to me? exciting, wasn't it?

sadly, no more "puNs" or the unrestricted use of the northpeepal's "mc" and "bc" from you after the iyengar slapped you! does it still hurt? your consolation should be that he did so before he knew that you are a tamil brahmin. you and the iyengar still need to learn that a crass tamil brahmin is just crass.

hahaha! such a fossil you are..

"didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives" wtf? where? show me one post where there is even a hint of such depraved perversions that you have confessed to, many times; with which propa humiliated you a zillion times. [b]வெறும் கையிலே மல்லிகயை முழம் போட்டவன்தானே நீ! punny, isn't it? - in your language, a cheap twat of a liar!

who is that iyengar that all of a sudden you suck up to? why? and slapped me? mbwahahaha  you sistahs are both like as they say "subjects in a course in clinical psychology. The conduct that you do, literally, and you accuse others of doing"

சப்..சப்..சப்..சப்புனா..only with you..you are so special, na? you are such a 'curiosity', I mean, clinically speaking..and we (me and the 'íyengar') are not the only one, na? apparently, all others as well. at least, I started whipping you only after you started abusing my handle, remember?

bite me again, please!

hold your premature ejaculations for your sistah sapna mite! she is senile but her ramblings are amusing...unlike your sterile repetitive unoriginal spurts! of course you are doing all this for your own smelling and fainting right?

swapna wrote:
I note that the information content of biology is more suited to your taste. in biology, you learnt about women's body parts, especially the vagina, whose vulgar, tamil name you routinely used as an appellation for males you dislike, just as tyre-level seetharamayya uses its crude, english equivalent for nearly all women. (you two should get together and discuss your p's and c's.)

didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives, "cleverly" attributiing it to me? exciting, wasn't it?

sadly, no more "puNs" or the unrestricted use of the northpeepal's "mc" and "bc" from you after the iyengar slapped you! does it still hurt? your consolation should be that he did so before he knew that you are a tamil brahmin. you and the iyengar still need to learn that a crass tamil brahmin is just crass.

garam_kuta wrote:
hahaha! such a fossil you are?

"didn't you also habitually talk about copulating with close female relatives" wtf? where? show me one post where there is even a hint of such depraved perversions that you have confessed to, many times; with which propa humiliated you a zillion times. வெறும் கையிலே மல்லிகயை முழம் போட்டவன்தானே நீ! punny, isn't it? - in your language, a cheap twat of a liar!

who is that iyengar that all of a sudden you suck up to? why? and slapped me? mbwahahaha  you sistahs are both like as they say "subjects in a course in clinical psychology. The conduct that you do, literally, and you accuse others of doing"

சப்..சப்..சப்..சப்புனா..only with you..you are so special, na? you are such a 'curiosity', I mean, clinically speaking..and we (me and the 'íyengar') are not the only one, na? apparently, all others as well. at least, I started whipping you only after you started abusing my handle, remember?

bite me again, please!