Agenda de jour: divide and rule

bw wrote:i am more interested in the various strategic alliances formed.

Rashmun wrote:So much for PP's claim that he does not read my posts anymore! Hahaha.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:So much for PP's claim that he does not read my posts anymore! Hahaha.

douchemunullah gangotrichatopadhayay hasnt understood the concept of blocking yet. douche (may I call you that affectionately), let me correct the misunderstanding you've been belaboring under, namely that the sideways screwing glut admin has not ignored you, he just said he did but is really devouring your original content voraciously:

you see, when someone replies to a poster that is on ignore, the ignoree can see the original content posted by the ignored and may respond to it if he sees fit.

I know you're emotionally challenged and a failed phd, but it''s not such a hard concept to grasp. or are you just ignoring this so it can fit your narrative, like rest of your theories are built?

kinnera wrote:Rashmun, when are you getting married? Just asking. Aren't you waaaaaay into your 30s and fast racing towards 40s?

Does you website have any other visitor lately other than QB and you?

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:Rashmun, when are you getting married? Just asking. Aren't you waaaaaay into your 30s and fast racing towards 40s?

Does you website have any other visitor lately other than QB and you?

Is it time now for another chat session with Bittu?

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:Rashmun, when are you getting married? Just asking. Aren't you waaaaaay into your 30s and fast racing towards 40s?

Does you website have any other visitor lately other than QB and you?

Is it time now for another chat session with Bittu?

Trying to escape answering by deviating? That's ok, if you don't want to answer. I can understand your discomfort. I do wish you get married soon. It's already soooo late and you are in the uncle category for quite a while now.

I wish you good luck with your website. I know you worked hard and tried all your strategies and machinations to get visitors to your site. It's heartbreaking to have only one visitor in it except yourself. I can understand your plight. Good luck to you!

I sincerely hope you get married and get busy with your family and also that your website works and you get busy there.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Munmun, do you do sex chatting with strangers now?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:munmun, i just got concerned about you re, that's why i asked.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:Rashmun, when are you getting married? Just asking. Aren't you waaaaaay into your 30s and fast racing towards 40s?

Does you website have any other visitor lately other than QB and you?

Is it time now for another chat session with Bittu?

Trying to escape answering by deviating? That's ok, if you don't want to answer. I can understand your discomfort. I do wish you get married soon. It's already soooo late and you are in the uncle category for quite a while now.

I wish you good luck with your website. I know you worked hard and tried all your strategies and machinations to get visitors to your site. It's heartbreaking to have only one visitor in it except yourself. I can understand your plight. Good luck to you!

I sincerely hope you get married and get busy with your family and also that your website works and you get busy there.

thanks for your good wishes. i would hope that i do not participate in sex chatting with strangers after marriage like you have been doing.

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:Rashmun, when are you getting married? Just asking. Aren't you waaaaaay into your 30s and fast racing towards 40s?

Does you website have any other visitor lately other than QB and you?

Is it time now for another chat session with Bittu?

Trying to escape answering by deviating? That's ok, if you don't want to answer. I can understand your discomfort. I do wish you get married soon. It's already soooo late and you are in the uncle category for quite a while now.

I wish you good luck with your website. I know you worked hard and tried all your strategies and machinations to get visitors to your site. It's heartbreaking to have only one visitor in it except yourself. I can understand your plight. Good luck to you!

I sincerely hope you get married and get busy with your family and also that your website works and you get busy there.

thanks for your good wishes. i would hope that i do not participate in sex chatting with strangers after marriage like you have been doing.

Don't deviate again. Why is it that you are not married yet? And why is it that your website got no visitors? How many registered users does it have? You think ppl have an issue of trust with you to register in your site? Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best efforts?

kinnera wrote:
Why is it that you are not married yet?

kinnera wrote:
Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best
efforts?

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:
Why is it that you are not married yet?

Maybe that is another of his delusions that he shared with everyone.

kinnera wrote:
Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best
efforts?

Maybe that is why he fights with everyone here. He is upset and angry no one has registered there.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:
Why is it that you are not married yet?

Maybe that is another of his delusions that he shared with everyone.

kinnera wrote:
Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best
efforts?

Maybe that is why he fights with everyone here. He is upset and angry no one has registered there.

L'angelo makes an appearance after getting screwed sideways.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:
Why is it that you are not married yet?

Maybe that is another of his delusions that he shared with everyone.

kinnera wrote:
Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best
efforts?

Maybe that is why he fights with everyone here. He is upset and angry no one has registered there.

L'angelo makes an appearance after getting screwed sideways.

Poor Rashman. Now his geriatric boyfriend's obsessions have been projected onto him.

Hellsangel wrote:

After his good buddy dumped him L'Angelo has become a shadow of himself. He is suddenly concerned about whether his private details might be revealed and bandied about like he used to do with the private details of other posters.

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Is it time now for another chat session with Bittu?

Trying to escape answering by deviating? That's ok, if you don't want to answer. I can understand your discomfort.
I wish you good luck with your website. I know you worked hard and tried all your strategies and machinations to get visitors to your site. It's heartbreaking to have only one visitor in it except yourself. I can understand your plight. Good luck to you!

I sincerely hope you get married and get busy with your family and also that your website works and you get busy there.

thanks for your good wishes. i would hope that i do not participate in sex chatting with strangers after marriage like you have been doing.

Don't deviate again. Why is it that you are not married yet? And why is it that your website got no visitors? How many registered users does it have? You think ppl have an issue of trust with you to register in your site? Why is it such a dead website in spite of all your best efforts?

do you get aroused when chatting with Bittu?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

After his good buddy dumped him L'Angelo has become a shadow of himself. He is suddenly concerned about whether his private details might be revealed and bandied about like he used to do with the private details of other posters.

You really are delsuional in real life, aren't you, Rashman? Or do you just pretend to be dense to have the last word?

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

Cute to see L'Angelo employing the projection trick.

Hellsangel wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

Cute to see L'Angelo employing the projection trick.

Whaddya know? You lap up words you pick up here like a sponge.

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

Rashmun wrote:

L'Angelo seems to have mellowed down after he got dumped by his good buddy on the ground that he is malicious, mean, vindictive, and vicious.

kinnera wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

One woman may be sacrificed for the good of the community. The poor woman does have my condolences though.

Propagandhi711 wrote:you see, when someone replies to a poster that is on ignore, the ignoree can see the original content posted by the ignored and may respond to it if he sees fit.

Propagandhi711 wrote:I know you're emotionally challenged and a failed phd, but it''s not such a hard concept to grasp. or are you just ignoring this so it can fit your narrative, like rest of your theories are built?

Vidya Bagchi wrote:Keep hopes. While Munmun may wanna recite Upanishads to glorify her, and then if she refuses he may wanna unglorify her, he may get some shock treatments in return that might make him forget Upanishads and other glorious men from history forever.

panini press wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:you see, when someone replies to a poster that is on ignore, the ignoree can see the original content posted by the ignored and may respond to it if he sees fit.

Correct, and I also see thread titles in the main page. When I see titles like "Tamil vs. Tamils," "Kannadiga in Tamil Nadu," "Tamilians in Karnataka," "Tamil-Kannadiga conflict," all created in a mad rush, it is quite transparent what Mr. Agenda is up to. It is after all the transparency that makes all this pathetic and comical at the same time.

Propagandhi711 wrote:I know you're emotionally challenged and a failed phd, but it''s not such a hard concept to grasp. or are you just ignoring this so it can fit your narrative, like rest of your theories are built?

Little bit of both, if I had to guess. He wills himself not to grasp facts that go against his theories (e.g. "it is a middle-parted head, not a butt") and repeats the nonsense a few times until he begins to believe it.

Vidya Bagchi wrote:

kinnera wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

kinnera wrote:

deviating again? Did i make you uncomfortable or something? Again, i do wish you get married soon and wish your website has other visitors than just QB. i know it's pathetic!

Why would you want to punish any woman like that?

One woman may be sacrificed for the good of the community. The poor woman does have my condolences though.

Keep hopes. While Munmun may wanna recite Upanishads to glorify her, and then if she refuses he may wanna unglorify her, he may get some shock treatments in return that might make him forget Upanishads and other glorious men from history forever.

panini press wrote:In politics and sociology, divide and rule (or divide and conquer) (derived from Greek: διαίρει καὶ βασίλευε (Diaírei kaì basíleue)) is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into chunks that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy. The concept refers to a strategy that breaks up existing power structures and prevents smaller power groups from linking up.

The maxims divide et impera and divide ut regnes were utilised by the Roman ruler Caesar and the French emperor Napoleon.

Elements of this technique involve:

• creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign
  
• aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign
  
• fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers
  
• encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending
  

Historically this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories.

The British and French set the Indian states against each other, both as a means of undermining each other's influence and consolidating their authority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule

Propagandhi711 wrote:...let me correct the misunderstanding you've been belaboring under...

Propagandhi711 wrote:you see, when someone replies to a poster that is on ignore, the ignoree can see the original content posted by the ignored and may respond to it if he sees fit.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:...let me correct the misunderstanding you've been belaboring under...

hahaha @"belaboring." that must be the pompous and incorrect version of "laboring."

Propagandhi711 wrote:you see, when someone replies to a poster that is on ignore, the ignoree can see the original content posted by the ignored and may respond to it if he sees fit.

that's not surprising, since the ignoree is the same as the (one who is) ignored, just as the employee is the same as the (one who is) employed. FAIL!

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

panini press wrote:In politics and sociology, divide and rule (or divide and conquer) (derived from Greek: διαίρει καὶ βασίλευε (Diaírei kaì basíleue)) is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into chunks that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy. The concept refers to a strategy that breaks up existing power structures and prevents smaller power groups from linking up.

The maxims divide et impera and divide ut regnes were utilised by the Roman ruler Caesar and the French emperor Napoleon.

Elements of this technique involve:

• creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign
  
• aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign
  
• fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers
  
• encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending
  

Historically this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories.

The British and French set the Indian states against each other, both as a means of undermining each other's influence and consolidating their authority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule

What is your view, speculation and/or Statement of Fact in all this?

panini press wrote:and that's what makes it pathetic and comical at once.

panini press wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

panini press wrote:In politics and sociology, divide and rule (or divide and conquer) (derived from Greek: διαίρει καὶ βασίλευε (Diaírei kaì basíleue)) is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into chunks that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy. The concept refers to a strategy that breaks up existing power structures and prevents smaller power groups from linking up.

The maxims divide et impera and divide ut regnes were utilised by the Roman ruler Caesar and the French emperor Napoleon.

Elements of this technique involve:

• creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign
  
• aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign
  
• fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers
  
• encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending
  

Historically this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories.

The British and French set the Indian states against each other, both as a means of undermining each other's influence and consolidating their authority.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule

What is your view, speculation and/or Statement of Fact in all this?

My view is that Rashmun is trying to emphasize and encourage divisions between southern Indians. He has in the past crudely harped on differences along the lines of Tamilians vs. Kannadigas, Kannadigas vs. Telugus, Tamilians vs. Telugus, Telangana Telugus vs. Kostandhra Telugus, Telangana Muslims vs. Telangana Hindus, Southern Tamil Nadu Muslims vs. Northern Tamil Nadu Muslims, etc. This is interesting when you consider the fact that he is the most prolific poster on the subject of "synthesis and integration." Just as he posts ad nauseam on the interesting but small similarities between say Tamil Nadu and Kashmir or Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh, he also selectively highlights the differences between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Perhaps his attempt is to prove that Kannadigas and Tamilians are both closer to Hindians than to each other! I don't know what his motivations are, and frankly I don't give a damn. But his agenda is rather transparent, and that's what makes it pathetic and comical at once.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:[quote="panini press"
What is your view, speculation and/or Statement of Fact in all this?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

He just wants attention. Reminds me of the crazy guy who used to clean town buses at bus stops repeating the same set of words "Stop..stop... all get down...all get on to the bus... bus clean bus clean...right right.."
...

Rashmunullah Jehadi Sir ji is right there - almost.

Hellsangel wrote:

panini press wrote:and that's what makes it pathetic and comical at once.

It is entertaining up to a point, when you are bored.

Hellsangel wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

He just wants attention. Reminds me of the crazy guy who used to clean town buses at bus stops repeating the same set of words "Stop..stop... all get down...all get on to the bus... bus clean bus clean...right right.."
...

Rashmunullah Jehadi Sir ji is right there - almost.

Your Holiness, you hit the nail on the head.

Jeremiah Mburuburu wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

panini press wrote:and that's what makes it pathetic and comical at once.

It is entertaining up to a point, when you are bored.

look up "sycophant" now.

Rashmun wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

He just wants attention. Reminds me of the crazy guy who used to clean town buses at bus stops repeating the same set of words "Stop..stop... all get down...all get on to the bus... bus clean bus clean...right right.."
...

Rashmunullah Jehadi Sir ji is right there - almost.

Your Holiness, you hit the nail on the head.

HA seems to have mellowed down considerably since he got dumped recently by one of his close buddies.