Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inInd Vs SL
+4
Kayalvizhi
nevada
confuzzled dude
goodcitizn
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ind Vs SL
by goodcitizn Tue Jul 02, 2013 1:24 pm
SL 206/0 after 38 overs. Jayawardane 101 and Tharanga 94. Looks like India will have an uphill task.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Ind Vs SL
by confuzzled dude Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:13 pm
313/1 after 48, this is a goner. Looks like our boyz is homesick.
confuzzled dude- Posts : 10205
Join date : 2011-05-08
Re: Ind Vs SL
by goodcitizn Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:29 pm
confuzzled dude wrote:313/1 after 48, this is a goner. Looks like our boyz is homesick.
No. It's 348/1 after 50. Tharanga played is 174 not out! Things don't bode too well unless some miracle happens.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Ind Vs SL
by goodcitizn Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:27 pm
India in dire straits -- 84/4 Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli and Murali Vijay gone. Close the curtains, turn off the lights and call it a night.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Ind Vs SL
by nevada Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:39 pm
This match is a total beat down. I hope the team can bounce back in the next match.
nevada- Posts : 1831
Join date : 2011-04-29
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Kayalvizhi Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:21 pm
in the 1970s India refused to plat cricket ball with UK because it plays with apartheid South Africa but india has no probvlem playing with Lanka that massacred Tamils and continues to treat them as outcastrs
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by goodcitizn Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:31 pm
What's next? Since Nelson Mandela was awarded Bharat Ratna should India award your commander the same?Kayalvizhi wrote:in the 1970s India refused to plat cricket ball with UK because it plays with apartheid South Africa but india has no probvlem playing with Lanka that massacred Tamils and continues to treat them as outcastrs
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Kayalvizhi Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:32 pm
whats the difference beween mandela and the commander except the latter the world left his people alone to fight their enemies.
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by southindian Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:41 pm
Kayalvizhi wrote:whats the difference beween mandela and the commander except the latter the world left his people alone to fight their enemies.
You are comparing a terrorist with Mandela? You are an idiot.
southindian- Posts : 4643
Join date : 2012-10-08
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Kayalvizhi Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:04 pm
Look, both Mandela and the commandered considered violent actions against oppressive regimes valid options. Mandela never condemned as\cts of violence by ANC. Do you know that?
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Kayalvizhi Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:17 pm
Do you know that Mandela was banned from entering US for years. They forgot to remove it even after he became South African president and hurriedly waived the ban during his first visit to US.
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by goodcitizn Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:33 pm
The worst mistake your commander made, among others, was to order the assassination of the Prime Minister of India. And you lose credibility when you don't have the decency to admit it.Kayalvizhi wrote:whats the difference beween mandela and the commander except the latter the world left his people alone to fight their enemies.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Ind Vs SL
by churi. Wed Jul 03, 2013 6:56 am
Kayalvizhi wrote:Look, both Mandela and the commandered considered violent actions against oppressive regimes valid options. Mandela never condemned as\cts of violence by ANC. Do you know that?
Yes, Mandela targeted the regime, not civilians. There is a difference.
churi.- Posts : 59
Join date : 2012-11-13
Location : Redmond
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Kayalvizhi Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:45 am
Read. Mandela was president of ANC. If ANC accused someone of collaboration, they were brought to street, a tire was put around the neck, poured petroleum and set to fire so they were burnt to death.
In such cases, Tamil shot the collaborator.
Commander never targeted civilians.
In such cases, Tamil shot the collaborator.
Commander never targeted civilians.
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by southindian Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:48 am
Kayalvizhi wrote:Read. Mandela was president of ANC. If ANC accused someone of collaboration, they were brought to street, a tire was put around the neck, poured petroleum and set to fire so they were burnt to death.
In such cases, Tamil shot the collaborator.
Commander never targeted civilians.
LOL. What a jackass you are.
southindian- Posts : 4643
Join date : 2012-10-08
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by southindian Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:53 am
Kayalvizhi wrote:i gave u facts. u call me names.
Yes. Fact. You are an idiot.
southindian- Posts : 4643
Join date : 2012-10-08
Re: Ind Vs SL
by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:55 am
Kayalvizhi wrote:i gave u facts. u call me names.
facts ??? you n tamil tribune dont count....just saying....
your "MaanaSeegha Commander" is personally and directly responsible for the suffering of the entire Ealam Tamil people.
That is the ultimate truth.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Kayalvizhi- Posts : 3659
Join date : 2011-05-16
Re: Ind Vs SL
by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:20 am
the difference that really stands out for me is the absence of child soldiers or any kind of child recruits in the anti-apartheid protests versus pirabakaran's murderous ways.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|