Why does Narendra Modi tell blatant Lies?

Rashmun wrote:Math Problem

HRD minister Shashi Tharoor issued a quick retort after Gujarat CM Narendra Modi claimed publicly that China spends 20 per cent of its GDP on education. It turns out that the figure, according to Tharoor and a Xinhua release, is just 3.93.

http://www.outlookindia.com/polscape.aspx?0

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:Math Problem

HRD minister Shashi Tharoor issued a quick retort after Gujarat CM Narendra Modi claimed publicly that China spends 20 per cent of its GDP on education. It turns out that the figure, according to Tharoor and a Xinhua release, is just 3.93.

http://www.outlookindia.com/polscape.aspx?0

he and the BJP are learning from the CONmen led by MT Sonia mata that lying is the only way to power.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:Math Problem

HRD minister Shashi Tharoor issued a quick retort after Gujarat CM Narendra Modi claimed publicly that China spends 20 per cent of its GDP on education. It turns out that the figure, according to Tharoor and a Xinhua release, is just 3.93.

http://www.outlookindia.com/polscape.aspx?0

he and the BJP are learning from the CONmen led by MT Sonia mata that lying is the only way to power.

i don't recall Sonia telling any blatant Lie.

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

The people running the show in the BJP are the khaki chaddi wearing RSS walahs sitting in Nagpur.

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

The people running the show in the BJP are the khaki chaddi wearing RSS walahs sitting in Nagpur.

 >>They are not in power right now.  But please answer his point. Why isn't she giving extempore interviews and not taking questions. May be she does not understand the issues well enough OR somebody else is deciding things for her. Power without accountability is very dangerous, as seen from the days of Rasputin.

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

The people running the show in the BJP are the khaki chaddi wearing RSS walahs sitting in Nagpur.

 >>They are not in power right now.  But please answer his point. Why isn't she giving extempore interviews and not taking questions. May be she does not understand the issues well enough OR somebody else is deciding things for her. Power without accountability is very dangerous, as seen from the days of Rasputin.

I am not disputing your criticism; i am only saying that it applies equally to the RSS chaddiwalahs of Nagpur who decide who will be the BJP president, who will be the Prime Ministerial candidate, etc. The difference is that the chaddis have an agenda of stirring communal trouble and disturbing communal harmony. Congress prefers to take all communities along with it. Congress, unlike the BJP, is an inclusive party.

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

The people running the show in the BJP are the khaki chaddi wearing RSS walahs sitting in Nagpur.

 >>They are not in power right now.  But please answer his point. Why isn't she giving extempore interviews and not taking questions. May be she does not understand the issues well enough OR somebody else is deciding things for her. Power without accountability is very dangerous, as seen from the days of Rasputin.

I am not disputing your criticism; i am only saying that it applies equally to the RSS chaddiwalahs of Nagpur who decide who will be the BJP president, who will be the Prime Ministerial candidate, etc. The difference is that the chaddis have an agenda of stirring communal trouble and disturbing communal harmony. Congress prefers to take all communities along with it. Congress, unlike the BJP, is an inclusive party.

>> Can we cut out the cock and  bull story. The issue is Congress is in power and it is frightening that such a dispensation should continue to have power, when its bonafides are not clear ON what kind of person is running the show. This is just one reason why Congress is NOT good. Let us keep the focus on only that.  With such an opaque administration in power they shouldn't be talking about a challenger. Thus first let Congress first fix its house in order and learn to be more responsible and have accountable people rather than talking about BJP. The same goes with you, who should be criticizing Congress for its opaque administration mirroring the reign of Rasputin.

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:Exactly, at least he speaks, unlike Madamji. We don't even know who is running the show there. Sonia/NAG Cohorts/Ahmed Patel or somebody else.

The people running the show in the BJP are the khaki chaddi wearing RSS walahs sitting in Nagpur.

 >>They are not in power right now.  But please answer his point. Why isn't she giving extempore interviews and not taking questions. May be she does not understand the issues well enough OR somebody else is deciding things for her. Power without accountability is very dangerous, as seen from the days of Rasputin.

I am not disputing your criticism; i am only saying that it applies equally to the RSS chaddiwalahs of Nagpur who decide who will be the BJP president, who will be the Prime Ministerial candidate, etc. The difference is that the chaddis have an agenda of stirring communal trouble and disturbing communal harmony. Congress prefers to take all communities along with it. Congress, unlike the BJP, is an inclusive party.

>> Can we cut out the cock and  bull story. The issue is Congress is in power and it is frightening that such a dispensation should continue to have power, when its bonafides are not clear ON what kind of person is running the show. This is just one reason why Congress is NOT good. Let us keep the focus on only that.  With such an opaque administration in power they shouldn't be talking about a challenger. Thus first let Congress first fix its house in order and learn to be more responsible and have accountable people rather than talking about BJP. The same goes with you, who should be criticizing Congress for its opaque administration mirroring the reign of Rasputin.

Rashmun wrote:
There are certainly structural problems in the Congress party, but the problem is that there are similar structural problems in the main opposition party BJP. In one you have the Gandhi family wielding power; in the other we have the Khaki chaddiwalahs of Nagpur wielding paramount power.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
There are certainly structural problems in the Congress party, but the problem is that there are similar structural problems in the main opposition party BJP. In one you have the Gandhi family wielding power; in the other we have the Khaki chaddiwalahs of Nagpur wielding paramount power.

Nikkarwalas are 5 millions and they don't breed their kids into power.

Whereras Nehru Dynasty has 5 people and ensures only they control India and its wealth.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
There are certainly structural problems in the Congress party, but the problem is that there are similar structural problems in the main opposition party BJP. In one you have the Gandhi family wielding power; in the other we have the Khaki chaddiwalahs of Nagpur wielding paramount power.

Nikkarwalas are 5 millions and they don't breed their kids into power.

Whereras Nehru Dynasty has 5 people and ensures only they control India and its wealth.

But the dynasty stands for secularism while the knickerbockers are anti-national because they talk of 'Hindu rashtravada' whereas India has a secular constitution. Moreover, many of the BJP allies like Shiv Sena, Shiromani Akali Dal, etc. also have a dynasty controling these parties. IF chaddis have a problem with dynasty then they should shun all their allies which have a political dynasty controlling a political party. Furthermore it is not that no chaddi's children enter politics in a big way. Even in the BJP we have people like Poonam Mahajan (daughter of Pramod Mahajan), former BJP CM BS Yeddyurappa's son, etc. who became MLA or MP only because of the family they were born into.

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
There are certainly structural problems in the Congress party, but the problem is that there are similar structural problems in the main opposition party BJP. In one you have the Gandhi family wielding power; in the other we have the Khaki chaddiwalahs of Nagpur wielding paramount power.

Nikkarwalas are 5 millions and they don't breed their kids into power.

Whereras Nehru Dynasty has 5 people and ensures only they control India and its wealth.

But the dynasty stands for secularism while the knickerbockers are anti-national because they talk of 'Hindu rashtravada' whereas India has a secular constitution. Moreover, many of the BJP allies like Shiv Sena, Shiromani Akali Dal, etc. also have a dynasty controling these parties. IF chaddis have a problem with dynasty then they should shun all their allies which have a political dynasty controlling a political party. Furthermore it is not that no chaddi's children enter politics in a big way. Even in the BJP we have people like Poonam Mahajan (daughter of Pramod Mahajan), former BJP CM BS Yeddyurappa's son, etc. who became MLA or MP only because of the family they were born into.

I do not care about the party. The problem is that they are in power and screwing the country with their ridiculous half baked policies.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:[

Nikkarwalas are 5 millions and they don't breed their kids into power.

Whereras Nehru Dynasty has 5 people and ensures only they control India and its wealth.

But the dynasty stands for secularism while the knickerbockers are anti-national because they talk of 'Hindu rashtravada' whereas India has a secular constitution. Moreover, many of the BJP allies like Shiv Sena, Shiromani Akali Dal, etc. also have a dynasty controling these parties. IF chaddis have a problem with dynasty then they should shun all their allies which have a political dynasty controlling a political party. Furthermore it is not that no chaddi's children enter politics in a big way. Even in the BJP we have people like Poonam Mahajan (daughter of Pramod Mahajan), former BJP CM BS Yeddyurappa's son, etc. who became MLA or MP only because of the family they were born into.

Rashmun wrote:Math Problem

HRD minister Shashi Tharoor issued a quick retort after Gujarat CM Narendra Modi claimed publicly that China spends 20 per cent of its GDP on education. It turns out that the figure, according to Tharoor and a Xinhua release, is just 3.93.

http://www.outlookindia.com/polscape.aspx?0

Rishi wrote:Rashmun,

The Congress party has really smart and well educated people who are not only effective but also articulate. They should be  given a chance to lead the country. As long as that party is controlled by Sonia Gandhi family,  it has no future.

Rashmun wrote:

Rishi wrote:Rashmun,

The Congress party has really smart and well educated people who are not only effective but also articulate. They should be  given a chance to lead the country. As long as that party is controlled by Sonia Gandhi family,  it has no future.

The problem is that if the Gandhi family stops controlling the Congress, the party could break apart. Similarly if the RSS stops controlling the BJP then the BJP will eventually break apart.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rishi wrote:Rashmun,

The Congress party has really smart and well educated people who are not only effective but also articulate. They should be  given a chance to lead the country. As long as that party is controlled by Sonia Gandhi family,  it has no future.

The problem is that if the Gandhi family stops controlling the Congress, the party could break apart. Similarly if the RSS stops controlling the BJP then the BJP will eventually break apart.

what you are saying is it is ok if the congress splits the country on caste and religious lines, but proecting congress itself is more important than India, and for that only the Dynasty should rule/control for eternity.

Rashmun wrote:
Wrong. I am saying BJP is more dangerous than Congress because it divides the people. congress tries to take everyone along with it. But if Gandhis stop controlling Congress or if RSS stops controlling BJP then there could be a split in these parties. I am also saying that the parties of BJP allies have dynasties controlling them.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
Wrong. I am saying BJP is more dangerous than Congress because it divides the people. congress tries to take everyone along with it. But if Gandhis stop controlling Congress or if RSS stops controlling BJP then there could be a split in these parties. I am also saying that the parties of BJP allies have dynasties controlling them.

Thank you for admitting that the Dynasty and the CONmen are more important than India and needs to be protected no matter what.

Rashmun wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:
There are certainly structural problems in the Congress party, but the problem is that there are similar structural problems in the main opposition party BJP. In one you have the Gandhi family wielding power; in the other we have the Khaki chaddiwalahs of Nagpur wielding paramount power.

Nikkarwalas are 5 millions and they don't breed their kids into power.

Whereras Nehru Dynasty has 5 people and ensures only they control India and its wealth.

But the dynasty stands for secularism while the knickerbockers are anti-national because they talk of 'Hindu rashtravada' whereas India has a secular constitution. Moreover, many of the BJP allies like Shiv Sena, Shiromani Akali Dal, etc. also have a dynasty controling these parties. IF chaddis have a problem with dynasty then they should shun all their allies which have a political dynasty controlling a political party. Furthermore it is not that no chaddi's children enter politics in a big way. Even in the BJP we have people like Poonam Mahajan (daughter of Pramod Mahajan), former BJP CM BS Yeddyurappa's son, etc. who became MLA or MP only because of the family they were born into.

I do not care about the party. The problem is that they are in power and screwing the country with their ridiculous half baked policies.

My point is that if the BJP comes to power it will screw the country even more. So the TINA factor works in favor of the Congress.

Note: TINA means There is No Alternative

rawemotions wrote:

....I can claim that of all the parties in India, Congress has been the most Communal minded party. It garners votes not using development. Instead it garners votes by dividing Hindus among casteist lines, giving importance to one religion over other, taking decisions to provoke people on religious lines, and even going for laws that are against constitution blatantly without any regard to the history of this country. In addition it uses CBI and other central institutions like a hound for political reasons. On top of it, as agreed it has a very opaque , Rasputin sort of leadership with no clear idea on who is making decisions.....