Bravo, Mr President!

http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/03/politics/government-shutdown-main/index.html

ah..i see no job, eh? ...started liking chocolate complexion now ?

garam_kuta wrote:ah..i see no job, eh?  ...started liking chocolate complexion now ?

Ha ha ha! I guess sarcasm is beyond the comprehension of frog-faced wussy Iyer Boy, Stalkeshwaran Incomprehensiblan.

Hellsangel wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/03/politics/government-shutdown-main/index.html

Blame the Rich and looters friends - Racist republicans for this.

They tried to block it and went to supreme court and that was that. They should give up. When reagan was misruling the country, the republicans were whining about Dem congress the stumbling block and regressive.

Plainly speaking republicans have long ceased to be politicians. They have become more like Rashmun-like idiots.

Hellsangel wrote:

garam_kuta wrote:ah..i see no job, eh?  ...started liking chocolate complexion now ?

Ha ha ha! I guess sarcasm is beyond the comprehension of frog-faced wussy Iyer Boy, Stalkeshwaran Incomprehensiblan.

sarcasm @ chocolate complexion, kakkasian ?

You should load visible pics, frog-faced Wussy Iyer boy.

the dems were fighting about little budget details. tip o'neill was hardly like eric cantor and company. it's not a fair comparison. they didn't ask the gipper to cancel the star wars program which would have been the equivalent of what the suicide bombers in the house are doing now.

Hellsangel wrote:You should load visible pics, frog-faced Wussy Iyer boy.

that's your mugshot - blanked it out, didn't want to gross out folks in their lunch time

garam_kuta wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:You should load visible pics, frog-faced Wussy Iyer boy.

that's your mugshot - blanked it out, didn't want to gross out folks in their lunch time

Sorry, frog-faced wussy Iyer boy, nothing can be grosser than that fat frog-face of yours. And you even seem to take pride in it.

I think Republicans are using obamacare as a tool to create a state of instability to hinder economic growth during obama presidency.
If Republicans allowed normal budgetary process Usa should easily see a growth rate of 2.5 to 3 . Unemployment may take a little longer but economic progress would have been faster.

truthbetold wrote:I think Republicans are using obamacare as a tool to create a state of instability to hinder economic growth during obama presidency.
If Republicans allowed normal budgetary process Usa should easily see a growth rate of 2.5 to 3 . Unemployment may take a little longer but economic progress would have been faster.

And what do you think about raising the debt ceiling?

teabaggies' recipe for the new american millenium


get rid of every single social program

arm all citizens

thump the bible

deny evolution and oppose the teaching of it in schools

obfuscate and obscure

sidle up to every single corporate lobby there is

deny global warming

gut science and r&d

violently stir and serve on foxnews and hate radio repeatedly for the foreseeable future.

Hellsangel wrote:

truthbetold wrote:I think Republicans are using obamacare as a tool to create a state of instability to hinder economic growth during obama presidency.
If Republicans allowed normal budgetary process Usa should easily see a growth rate of 2.5 to 3 . Unemployment may take a little longer but economic progress would have been faster.

And what do you think about raising the debt ceiling?

What about debt ceiling ? Reagan (Regan) taught the repubs to use national debt to enrich the rich.

Obamacare is the LAW OF THE LAND. The congress job is TO FUND as they do Social security, medicare, etc...PERIOD. The democrats never held any budget process to ransom when it came to Gun control or abortion rights or voucher douches.

Just obey the Law first. Oh wait... we are talking about the republicans...I realize they are exempted.

indophile wrote:What happens if a Katrina-level hurricane strikes Texas now? Wonder if Sen. Cruze would argue that only FEMA should be funded and restarted while the rest of the govt. should remain closed.

Republican are behaving like a bunch of kindergartners who don't like to obey the rules and fight over a chocolate suddenly forgetting everything else.

I hope the govt shut down continues for a while and again next October 14....for an even longer period.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:teabaggies' recipe for the new american millenium


get rid of every single social program

arm all citizens

thump the bible

deny evolution and oppose the teaching of it in schools

obfuscate and obscure

sidle up to every single corporate lobby there is

deny global warming

gut science and r&d

violently stir and serve on foxnews and hate radio repeatedly for the foreseeable future.

forgot to add gerrymander to that list.

I would like to see NYT or WaPo post a front page bold font list of "votes" by congressmen (unofficially) unconditionally supporting re-opening Government. Up/Down/Abstentions. Force the morons to own up their idiocy.

Petrichor wrote:I would like to see NYT or WaPo post a front page bold font list of "votes" by congressmen (unofficially) unconditionally supporting re-opening Government. Up/Down/Abstentions. Force the morons to own up their idiocy.

there is only one republican who will vote with the democrats openly right now. scott rigell from VA.

which means he can expect to run against a cock-brothers funded teabaggy in the 2014 primaries.

"Less than two days after the government shut down, there are now more than 17 Republicans who say they're ready to pass a bill to fund the government with no strings attached, giving the House the votes it needs to pass a clean funding bill."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/02/clean-funding-bill_n_4031784.html

Playing House of Cards, the tally looks like this:

Rep. Pat Meehan (R-Pa.): “At this point, I believe it’s time for the House to vote for a clean, short-term funding bill to bring the Senate to the table and negotiate a responsible compromise.” [Press Release, 10/1/13]

Rep. Scott Rigell (R-Va.): “Time for a clean [continuing resolution].” [Official Twitter, 10/1/13]

Rep. Jon Runyan (R-N.J.): “Enough is enough. Put a clean [continuing resolution] on the floor and let’s get on with the business we were sent to do." [Burlington County Times, 10/1/13]

Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.): A Fitzpatrick aide tells the Philadelphia Inquirer the congressman would support a clean funding bill if it came up for a vote. [Philadelphia Inquirer, 10/1/13]

Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.): Barletta said he would "absolutely" vote for a clean bill in order to avert a shut down of the government. [Bethlehem Morning Call, 10/1/13]

Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.): King thinks House Republicans would prefer to avoid a shutdown and said he will only vote for a clean continuing resolution to fund the government, according to the National Review Online. [NRO, 9/30/13]

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.): The California Republican told The Huffington Post he would ultimately support a clean continuing resolution. [Tweet by The Huffington Post's Sabrina Siddiqui, 9/30/13]

Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.): “I'm prepared to vote for a clean [continuing resolution].” [The Huffington Post, 9/29/13]

Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.): A Wolf aide told The Hill that he agrees with fellow Virginia Rep. Scott Rigell (R) that it's time for a clean continuing resolution. [The Hill, 10/1/13]

Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.): A Grimm aide told The Huffington Post that the congressman supports a clean continuing resolution. [10/1/13].

Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.): A local news anchor in Minnesota tweeted that Paulsen told him he would vote for a clean resolution if given the chance. [Blake McCoy Tweet, 10/1/13]

Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.): A constituent of Wittman's sent The Huffington Post an email she got from the congressman indicating he would vote for a clean funding bill but hasn't had "an opportunity to do so at this point." [10/1/13]

Rep. Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.): LoBiondo told The Press of Atlantic City he'll support "whatever gets a successful conclusion" to the shutdown and a clean funding bill "is one of those options." [The Press of Atlantic City, 10/1/13]

Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.): Forbes told The Virginian-Pilot that he supports the six-week clean funding bill that passed in the Senate. [The Virginian-Pilot, 10/2/13]

Rep. Jim Gerlach (R-Pa.): The congressman issued a statement saying he would "vote in favor of a so-called clean budget bill." [Office of Rep. Jim Gerlach, 10/2/13].

Rep. Leonard Lance (R-N.J.): Lance's chief of staff confirmed to The Huffington Post that he told a constituent on Wednesday that Lance has voted for clean government funding bills in the past "and would not oppose doing so again should one be brought to the floor." [10/2/13]

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho): Simpson told a Roll Call reporter Tuesday night, "I'd vote for a clean CR because I don't think this is a strategy that works." [Daniel Newhauser Tweet, 10/1/13]

Rep. Bill Young (R-Fla.): Young told Tampa Bay Times reporter Alex Leary that he's ready to vote for a clean funding bill. "The politics should be over," he said. "It's time to legislate." [Alex Leary Tweet, 10/2/13]

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.): The congressman told Miami Herald reporter Marc Caputo that he would vote for a clean funding bill, provided it has the same funding levels contained in the Senate-passed bill. [The Miami Herald, 10/2/13]

Rep. Richard Hanna (R-N.Y.): "I would take a clean (continuing resolution)." [Observer-Dispatch, 10/2/13]

Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.): A Davis constituent tells The Huffington Post that a Davis aide told him Wednesday, "Congressman Davis is prepared to vote 'yes' on a clean CR." Asked for comment, Davis spokesman Andrew Flach told HuffPost that Davis isn't "going to speculate" on what bills may come up in the House and "will continue to vote for proposals brought to the floor that will fund the federal government." [10/2/2013]

Rep. Tim Griffin (R-Ark.): Asked on Twitter if he would support a clean funding bill if it came up for a vote, Griffin tweeted, "sure. Ive already said i would support." [Official Twitter, 10/2/13].

didn't realize this list was already that long. have these gentlemen already been on the cock bros' shit list or are they going to get on it now?

The brothers are looking evil-er by the day. All these characters look straight out of central casting, as they say. GOP is basically done for the next couple of elections.

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:didn't realize this list was already that long. have these gentlemen already been on the cock bros' shit list or are they going to get on it now?

But, Boehner will not EVEN bring bill for vote. Crotch brothers just need to fund Boehner n for a threatening email to errant Repubs.

Petrichor wrote:The brothers are looking evil-er by the day. All these characters look straight out of central casting, as they say. GOP is basically done for the next couple of elections.

one would hope so, but i think they've gerrymandered their way to rock solid stability in the south, basically cutting districts up to ensure comfortable white majorities, eliminating black majority regions, and their constituents are solidly behind them. they'd sooner starve and suffer from all manner of disease and pestilence than support obummercare.