Richard Eaton: The claim that thousands of temples were destroyed across India is a myth
Page 1 of 1
Richard Eaton: The claim that thousands of temples were destroyed across India is a myth
You also examined at length the destruction of temples in this period. What did you find?
The temple discourse is huge in India and this is something that needs to be historicised. We need to look at the contemporary evidence. What do the inscriptions and contemporary chronicles say? What was so striking to me when I went into that project after the destruction of the Babri Masjid was that nobody had actually looked at the contemporary evidence. People were just saying all sorts of things about thousands of temples being destroyed by medieval Muslim kings. I looked at inscriptions, chronicles and foreign observers’ accounts from the 12th century up to the 18th century across South Asia to see what was destroyed and why. The big temples that were politically irrelevant were never harmed. Those that were politically relevant — patronised by an enemy king or a formerly loyal king who becomes a rebel — only those temples are wiped out. Because in the territory that is annexed to the State, all the property is considered to be under the protection of the State. The total number of temples that were destroyed across those six centuries was 80, not many thousands as is sometimes conjectured by various people. No one has contested that and I wrote that article 10 years ago.
http://www.tehelka.com/its-a-myth-that-muslim-rulers-destroyed-thousands-of-temples/
The temple discourse is huge in India and this is something that needs to be historicised. We need to look at the contemporary evidence. What do the inscriptions and contemporary chronicles say? What was so striking to me when I went into that project after the destruction of the Babri Masjid was that nobody had actually looked at the contemporary evidence. People were just saying all sorts of things about thousands of temples being destroyed by medieval Muslim kings. I looked at inscriptions, chronicles and foreign observers’ accounts from the 12th century up to the 18th century across South Asia to see what was destroyed and why. The big temples that were politically irrelevant were never harmed. Those that were politically relevant — patronised by an enemy king or a formerly loyal king who becomes a rebel — only those temples are wiped out. Because in the territory that is annexed to the State, all the property is considered to be under the protection of the State. The total number of temples that were destroyed across those six centuries was 80, not many thousands as is sometimes conjectured by various people. No one has contested that and I wrote that article 10 years ago.
http://www.tehelka.com/its-a-myth-that-muslim-rulers-destroyed-thousands-of-temples/
Guest- Guest
Re: Richard Eaton: The claim that thousands of temples were destroyed across India is a myth
Revati Laul, the tehelka journalist who conducted this interview, has resigned in protest at Tejpal's antics.Rashmun wrote:You also examined at length the destruction of temples in this period. What did you find?
The temple discourse is huge in India and this is something that needs to be historicised. We need to look at the contemporary evidence. What do the inscriptions and contemporary chronicles say? What was so striking to me when I went into that project after the destruction of the Babri Masjid was that nobody had actually looked at the contemporary evidence. People were just saying all sorts of things about thousands of temples being destroyed by medieval Muslim kings. I looked at inscriptions, chronicles and foreign observers’ accounts from the 12th century up to the 18th century across South Asia to see what was destroyed and why. The big temples that were politically irrelevant were never harmed. Those that were politically relevant — patronised by an enemy king or a formerly loyal king who becomes a rebel — only those temples are wiped out. Because in the territory that is annexed to the State, all the property is considered to be under the protection of the State. The total number of temples that were destroyed across those six centuries was 80, not many thousands as is sometimes conjectured by various people. No one has contested that and I wrote that article 10 years ago.
http://www.tehelka.com/its-a-myth-that-muslim-rulers-destroyed-thousands-of-temples/
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» If you think that Muslims destroyed temples only in North India........
» Census dispels Hindi myth, only 25% in India claim Hindi is their mother tongue
» The claim that Rashmun is the most prolific poster on this forum is a myth
» THE MYTH OF ISLAMIC CONTRIBUTION TO INDIA
» Is this how Budhism and Jainism were destroyed in India by Hindoos?
» Census dispels Hindi myth, only 25% in India claim Hindi is their mother tongue
» The claim that Rashmun is the most prolific poster on this forum is a myth
» THE MYTH OF ISLAMIC CONTRIBUTION TO INDIA
» Is this how Budhism and Jainism were destroyed in India by Hindoos?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum