Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inHomosexuality and Hinduism
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Homosexuality and Hinduism
by Rishi Fri Dec 13, 2013 4:10 pm
Homosexuality and Hindu law
Ancient Hindu law books, from the first century onwards, categorize ayoni (non-vaginal sex) as impure. But penances prescribed for same-sex acts are very light compared to penances for some types of heterosexual misconduct, such as adultery and rape. The Manusmriti exhorts a man who has sex with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or in water or by day to bathe with his clothes on (11.174). The Arthashastra imposes a minor fine on a man who has ayoni sex (4.13.236). Modern commentators misread the Manusmriti’s severe punishment of a woman’s manual penetration of a virgin (8.369-70) as anti-lesbian bias. In fact, the punishment is exactly the same for either a man (8.367) or a woman who does this act, and is related not to the partners’ genders but to the virgin’s loss of virginity and marriageable status. The Manusmriti does not mention a woman penetrating a non-virgin woman, and the Arthashastra prescribes a negligible fine for this act. The sacred epics and the Puranas (fourth to fourteenth-century compendia of devotional stories) contradict the law books; they depict Gods, sages, and heroes springing from ayoni sex. Unlike sodomy, ayoni sex never became a major topic of debate or an unspeakable crime. There is no evidence of anyone in India ever having been executed for same-sex relations.
http://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/homosexuality-and-hinduism-ruth-vanita/
Ancient Hindu law books, from the first century onwards, categorize ayoni (non-vaginal sex) as impure. But penances prescribed for same-sex acts are very light compared to penances for some types of heterosexual misconduct, such as adultery and rape. The Manusmriti exhorts a man who has sex with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or in water or by day to bathe with his clothes on (11.174). The Arthashastra imposes a minor fine on a man who has ayoni sex (4.13.236). Modern commentators misread the Manusmriti’s severe punishment of a woman’s manual penetration of a virgin (8.369-70) as anti-lesbian bias. In fact, the punishment is exactly the same for either a man (8.367) or a woman who does this act, and is related not to the partners’ genders but to the virgin’s loss of virginity and marriageable status. The Manusmriti does not mention a woman penetrating a non-virgin woman, and the Arthashastra prescribes a negligible fine for this act. The sacred epics and the Puranas (fourth to fourteenth-century compendia of devotional stories) contradict the law books; they depict Gods, sages, and heroes springing from ayoni sex. Unlike sodomy, ayoni sex never became a major topic of debate or an unspeakable crime. There is no evidence of anyone in India ever having been executed for same-sex relations.
http://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/homosexuality-and-hinduism-ruth-vanita/
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Re: Homosexuality and Hinduism
by Hellsangel Fri Dec 13, 2013 4:12 pm
Hey Papi, do what your heart tells you with Persian lover boy. Don't go around looking for religious blessing.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Similar topics» Akbar and the problem of reforming Hinduism: How a muslim king initiated reforms in Hinduism
» CNN's war against Hinduism
» What has gone wrong with Hinduism?
» The new Chaddi Hinduism
» Semitization of Hinduism
» CNN's war against Hinduism
» What has gone wrong with Hinduism?
» The new Chaddi Hinduism
» Semitization of Hinduism
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum