Modi's marriage a 'social formality', brother says; Congress threatens legal action

by Seva Lamberdar Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:31 pm

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Modis-marriage-a-social-formality-brother-says-Congress-threatens-legal-action/articleshow/33568895.cms

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:25 pm

CONmen are desperate. They should first answer why MT was hiding her passport, Bansal was hiding behind his nephew and Ashwini Kumar was engineering CBI documents.

Yesodabhen has an answer for them - she says, Modi will bring good governance and development to India as the PM.

by Idéfix Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:45 pm

I wonder whether the affidavit requires a person to state their marital status. If so, what status did Modi indicate in his previous nomination papers? It is one thing to leave a name field blank, but quite another to provide the wrong information in a sworn affidavit. Did he or did not lie in a sworn affidavit? If he did, he should face the legal consequences. If he did not, then his relationship with the woman he married 50 years ago and spent no time with since is of no consequence to this campaign.

by smArtha Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:55 pm

Idéfix wrote:I wonder whether the affidavit requires a person to state their marital status. If so, what status did Modi indicate in his previous nomination papers? It is one thing to leave a name field blank, but quite another to provide the wrong information in a sworn affidavit. Did he or did not lie in a sworn affidavit? If he did, he should face the legal consequences. If he did not, then his relationship with the woman he married 50 years ago and spent no time with since is of no consequence to this campaign.

Apparently, earlier the marital status and many other fields were optional or that is how many candidates treated them as. They just filled in what they thought was relevant and left other fields blank. Afaik, NaMo left it blank. This time around CEC made it mandatory that every question need some answer and cannot be left blank. Which is why NaMo now had to respond to that entry. Congress and NaMo opponents seem to have exhausted all ammunition to put him down and now bringing up very irrelevant and useless aspects of his life.

by indophile Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:07 pm

smArtha wrote:
Idéfix wrote:I wonder whether the affidavit requires a person to state their marital status. If so, what status did Modi indicate in his previous nomination papers? It is one thing to leave a name field blank, but quite another to provide the wrong information in a sworn affidavit. Did he or did not lie in a sworn affidavit? If he did, he should face the legal consequences. If he did not, then his relationship with the woman he married 50 years ago and spent no time with since is of no consequence to this campaign.

Apparently, earlier the marital status and many other fields were optional or that is how many candidates treated them as. They just filled in what they thought was relevant and left other fields blank.

Reminds me of birth certificates in the U.S. When a baby is born, they want to know only the mother's name. Father's name is optional. He they go by biological reasoning (Mother is definite; she went through labor and delivered the baby, but who knows who the father is! it's just someone's word).
In India, now that they are finally getting serious about birth certificates, there is a cultural necessity to make sure the father's name gets on that paper with the right spelling and all.

by Propagandhi711 Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:37 pm

legal action? let me see, this is the same congress that wanted the foreign born sonia maata to be PM?

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:48 pm

They say he's been married for almost 50 yrs. The guy is 63 yrs old. So, did he get married at 13? If so, is it even a legally valid marriage?

by confuzzled dude Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:39 pm

"Ms. Modi living in a one-room apartment with no toilet or bath and a monthly rent of 100 rupees, now equivalent to about $1.66."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/11/world/asia/top-indian-candidate-believed-a-bachelor-admits-to-being-married.html

-> No wonder Rahul was harping about women empowerment, may be he had Ms. Modi in his mind.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:03 pm

He got married in 1968. NaMo was just 17 when he got married. In India, the legal age for the man to get married is 21. Technically, he's not married. What do you say to that, Confu?

by confuzzled dude Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:12 pm

H

Kinnera wrote:He got married in 1968. NaMo was just 17 when he got married. In India, the legal age for the man to get married is 21. Technically, he's not married. What do you say to that, Confu?

He is 63 now and put it on the paper that she is his wife. You should pose this Q to Mr. Modi, not me

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:17 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:H
Kinnera wrote:He got married in 1968. NaMo was just 17 when he got married. In India, the legal age for the man to get married is 21. Technically, he's not married. What do you say to that, Confu?
He is 63 now and put it on the paper that she is his wife. You should pose this Q to Mr. Modi, not me

Whether he considers her his wife or not is up to him. Legally, she is not his wife. Congi ppl can't do anything abt it in the courts of law.

by southindian Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:19 pm

Funny enough, all "educated amricans" here are talking of marriage legality in today's India. They can always call their home in India and check with parents how many of their family members were illegally marred.

I can definitely say, my parents were illegally married. My mother was 17 at her marriage.

by confuzzled dude Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:24 pm

Kinnera wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:H
Kinnera wrote:He got married in 1968. NaMo was just 17 when he got married. In India, the legal age for the man to get married is 21. Technically, he's not married. What do you say to that, Confu?
He is 63 now and put it on the paper that she is his wife. You should pose this Q to Mr. Modi, not me
Whether he considers her his wife or not is up to him. Legally, she is not his wife. Congi ppl can't do anything abt it in the courts of law.

Sure and he didn't need to put it on the affidavit, who was he trying to please, his right wing brothers & sisters?

by b_A Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:39 pm

Forget the legality , "social formality" and all that , he has at least a moral obligation to her for ruining her life. It was worse than a widow's life. He should've at least paid some alimony or monetary compensation or taken care of her.

by truthbetold Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:16 pm

The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:23 pm

truthbetold wrote:The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

Modi was forced to confess the truth about his wife because when filing his nomination as Lok Sabha candidate he was legally obliged to divulge whether and to whom he is married. The more relevant question is why was Modi not mentioning this when filing his nomination in the Guj assembly elections. And all that useless talk of "realizing his mistake of abandoning his wife" is total rubbish.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:37 pm

Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

Modi was forced to confess the truth about his wife because when filing his nomination as Lok Sabha candidate he was legally obliged to divulge whether and to whom he is married. The more relevant question is why was Modi not mentioning this when filing his nomination in the Guj assembly elections. And all that useless talk of "realizing his mistake of abandoning his wife" is total rubbish.

What is your CONview on Lakshman's wife, in Ramayana?

In your CONview, when Lakshman was away, should Urmila do what she did in Ramayana or do what lover boy Abhishek Manu Singhvi or pervert N D Tiwari did?

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:41 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

Modi was forced to confess the truth about his wife because when filing his nomination as Lok Sabha candidate he was legally obliged to divulge whether and to whom he is married. The more relevant question is why was Modi not mentioning this when filing his nomination in the Guj assembly elections. And all that useless talk of "realizing his mistake of abandoning his wife" is total rubbish.
What is your CONview on Lakshman's wife, in Ramayana?

In your CONview, when Lakshman was away, should Urmila do what she did in Ramayana or do what lover boy Abhishek Manu Singhvi or pervert N D Tiwari did?

Lakshman was not hiding the fact of being married and pretending to be bachelor by leaving the spouse name blank when filing nomination for Gujarat assembly seat on three occasions.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:42 pm

Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

Modi was forced to confess the truth about his wife because when filing his nomination as Lok Sabha candidate he was legally obliged to divulge whether and to whom he is married. The more relevant question is why was Modi not mentioning this when filing his nomination in the Guj assembly elections. And all that useless talk of "realizing his mistake of abandoning his wife" is total rubbish.

That is correct. As to why it wasn't mentioned in the guj assembly elections is because it wasn't mandatory for that.

by truthbetold Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:53 pm

Rashmun,

I can answer at many levels.

First I do not give a damn about leader's personal shannanigans.

I do not approve of his actions.

But this is a strange situation. Modi left his wife before he knew how to make a living. It has nothing to do with his greed or political aspirations. He seems to have run away from this part of his life. Then he built his life and came into public life. This case is odd and strange but it is not a political case. Congress has no role in this. It is for modi to sort out his life.

He should have reached out for his wife to support her as she desired. But that is still in the personal domain. Congress just wants to find some dirt to hurt modi. It is not likely to help them by talking too much. They should learn from Bill clinton _Monica L. case. Where republicans, by pushing for impeachment, made clinton popular. If congress stays out, ordinary people will judge modi harshly for abandoning his wife atleast in the later part of his life.

The unknown is his wife's opinion on this relationship. She may not have wanted to have anything to do with him after a certain time.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:55 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:The funny part is congress threat to take action. What are they going ask the court? Make modi sleep with his wife? Sonia and Rahul will sit outside the room to ensure the marriage is consummated.

What a bunch of baloney.

It is one thing to for modi to realize his mistake of abandoning his wife and providing for her as necessary. But all this public hangama about a strange personal relationship is big bakwas and political foolishness.

If congress shuts the f'up, ordinary people will pass the judgement. Most likely people will say he did not act wisely in this case.

Modi was forced to confess the truth about his wife because when filing his nomination as Lok Sabha candidate he was legally obliged to divulge whether and to whom he is married. The more relevant question is why was Modi not mentioning this when filing his nomination in the Guj assembly elections. And all that useless talk of "realizing his mistake of abandoning his wife" is total rubbish.
What is your CONview on Lakshman's wife, in Ramayana?

In your CONview, when Lakshman was away, should Urmila do what she did in Ramayana or do what lover boy Abhishek Manu Singhvi or pervert N D Tiwari did?

Lakshman was not hiding the fact of being married and pretending to be bachelor by leaving the spouse name blank when filing nomination for Gujarat assembly seat on three occasions.

MOdi wasn't either. He just left the space blank and it was ok with the EC. He was trying not to create a controversy. In fact, his wife wasn't either. The people of her village chased CONmedia people away who were trying to harass her. Everyone that knew her spoke highly of her. Her family has nothing negative to say about Modi and Modi's family has only nice things to say about his wife.

The ND Tiwaris of CONartistry should scratch their own filthy balls and stop trying to get political milage out of someone else's personal life. Just as they received a jolt in Gujrat elections with their CONbehavior, they will be trashed this time at the national level.

The average Indian who reads how Jasodaben conducted herself all through the years will admire her and place her in the same league as Jhansi Lakshmibai, Rudramadevi, etc. Compare that with the lives of pathetic anti-national and corrupt CONmen and CONwomen.

by confuzzled dude Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:04 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
MOdi wasn't either. He just left the space blank and it was ok with the EC. He was trying not to create a controversy. In fact, his wife wasn't either. The people of her village chased CONmedia people away who were trying to harass her. Everyone that knew her spoke highly of her. Her family has nothing negative to say about Modi and Modi's family has only nice things to say about his wife.

The ND Tiwaris of CONartistry should scratch their own filthy balls and stop trying to get political milage out of someone else's personal life. Just as they received a jolt in Gujrat elections with their CONbehavior, they will be trashed this time at the national level.

The average Indian who reads how Jasodaben conducted herself all through the years will admire her and place her in the same league as Jhansi Lakshmibai, Rudramadevi, etc. Compare that with the lives of pathetic anti-national and corrupt CONmen and CONwomen.

Going by this yardstick Shah Bano & Muslim women get royal treatment.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:16 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
MOdi wasn't either. He just left the space blank and it was ok with the EC. He was trying not to create a controversy. In fact, his wife wasn't either. The people of her village chased CONmedia people away who were trying to harass her. Everyone that knew her spoke highly of her. Her family has nothing negative to say about Modi and Modi's family has only nice things to say about his wife.

The ND Tiwaris of CONartistry should scratch their own filthy balls and stop trying to get political milage out of someone else's personal life. Just as they received a jolt in Gujrat elections with their CONbehavior, they will be trashed this time at the national level.

The average Indian who reads how Jasodaben conducted herself all through the years will admire her and place her in the same league as Jhansi Lakshmibai, Rudramadevi, etc. Compare that with the lives of pathetic anti-national and corrupt CONmen and CONwomen.
Going by this yardstick Shah Bano & Muslim women get royal treatment.

There is a difference - Jasodaben lives an independent and dignified life. She didn't ask for any money from her husband and she always wished him well. Incidentally, Modi (unlike filthy CONmen) also lives a very modest life.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:20 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
MOdi wasn't either. He just left the space blank and it was ok with the EC. He was trying not to create a controversy. In fact, his wife wasn't either. The people of her village chased CONmedia people away who were trying to harass her. Everyone that knew her spoke highly of her. Her family has nothing negative to say about Modi and Modi's family has only nice things to say about his wife.

The ND Tiwaris of CONartistry should scratch their own filthy balls and stop trying to get political milage out of someone else's personal life. Just as they received a jolt in Gujrat elections with their CONbehavior, they will be trashed this time at the national level.

The average Indian who reads how Jasodaben conducted herself all through the years will admire her and place her in the same league as Jhansi Lakshmibai, Rudramadevi, etc. Compare that with the lives of pathetic anti-national and corrupt CONmen and CONwomen.
Going by this yardstick Shah Bano & Muslim women get royal treatment.
There is a difference - Jasodaben lives an independent and dignified life. She didn't ask for any money from her husband and she always wished him well. Incidentally, Modi (unlike filthy CONmen) also lives a very modest life.

Where did the Rs 1.5 crore come from?

http://www.ndtv.com/elections/article/election-2014/narendra-modi-declares-assets-worth-rs-1-51-crore-does-not-own-vehicle-506944

by truthbetold Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:23 pm

1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:25 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
MOdi wasn't either. He just left the space blank and it was ok with the EC. He was trying not to create a controversy. In fact, his wife wasn't either. The people of her village chased CONmedia people away who were trying to harass her. Everyone that knew her spoke highly of her. Her family has nothing negative to say about Modi and Modi's family has only nice things to say about his wife.

The ND Tiwaris of CONartistry should scratch their own filthy balls and stop trying to get political milage out of someone else's personal life. Just as they received a jolt in Gujrat elections with their CONbehavior, they will be trashed this time at the national level.

The average Indian who reads how Jasodaben conducted herself all through the years will admire her and place her in the same league as Jhansi Lakshmibai, Rudramadevi, etc. Compare that with the lives of pathetic anti-national and corrupt CONmen and CONwomen.
Going by this yardstick Shah Bano & Muslim women get royal treatment.
There is a difference - Jasodaben lives an independent and dignified life. She didn't ask for any money from her husband and she always wished him well. Incidentally, Modi (unlike filthy CONmen) also lives a very modest life.

Where did the Rs 1.5 crore come from?

http://www.ndtv.com/elections/article/election-2014/narendra-modi-declares-assets-worth-rs-1-51-crore-does-not-own-vehicle-506944

That is value of his flat (plus a small fixed deposit in the post office, I think). He has no other assets of value. He also doesn't have much money in his bank account.

You will be very disappointed if you try to find self-serving corruption in this man.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:27 pm

truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

how do we know he has no black money stashed away?

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:32 pm

Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

So where did he get the money to buy a Rs 1 crore house and how do we know he has no black money stashed away?

Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

by Guest Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:35 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

So where did he get the money to buy a Rs 1 crore house and how do we know he has no black money stashed away?
Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

Modi seems to be on the defensive on the wife issue. Now his older brother has issued an appeal to voters to continue to support him. Do you think Modi is getting desperate?

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:42 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

So where did he get the money to buy a Rs 1 crore house and how do we know he has no black money stashed away?
Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

Modi seems to be on the defensive on the wife issue. Now his older brother has issued an appeal to voters to continue to support him. Do you think Modi is getting desperate?

CONmen are the ones who are desperate now. That is why they (and you) are looking for anything and everything to find something wrong with him. The voters will punish you guys this time. They will be really pissed off if you go after Modi's wife because they have only admiration for her.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:03 pm

Seva Lamberdar wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Modis-marriage-a-social-formality-brother-says-Congress-threatens-legal-action/articleshow/33568895.cms

A man marries a woman at 17 and does not consummate the marriage. he leaves her for good after 3 months. No register marriage, no documentation, and n kids. Per hindu tradition, a husband who has disappeared for 7 years is considered dead and marriage ended. So technically Modi has been in a limbo - if he had claimed he was married, then he had no proof of marriage and had to explain his personal estrangment. So he never acknowledged or denied until now. Now that Jashodaben publicly claimed to be his wife, he came forward and acknowledged it.

This sure is a 1000 times more honest than MK who has 3 wives and visited prostitute all the time, Indira whose post-feroze stories are legendary. Now, how old was the western Italian wife of Rajiv when he was killed? hmmm....?...

And here is a synopsis of the dalliances of the Nehru family...

Sonia Gandhi had intense friendship with Madhavrao Scindia in the UK, which continued even after her marriage. One night at 2 AM in 1982, Madhavrao Scindia and Sonia Gandhi were caught alone together when their car met an accident near IIT Delhi main gate.

Will MT Sonia Mata ji come forward with her truths?

by Guest Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:21 am

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

So where did he get the money to buy a Rs 1 crore house and how do we know he has no black money stashed away?
Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

Modi seems to be on the defensive on the wife issue. Now his older brother has issued an appeal to voters to continue to support him. Do you think Modi is getting desperate?
CONmen are the ones who are desperate now. That is why they (and you) are looking for anything and everything to find something wrong with him. The voters will punish you guys this time. They will be really pissed off if you go after Modi's wife because they have only admiration for her.

Nobody is going after Modi's wife; they are going after Modi. Meanwhile, Rahul is now targeting Modi on this issue:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:43 am

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:

Irrelevant. His salary as CM of Gujarat is Rs 12,553 per month as per this news report:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

So where did he get the money to buy a Rs 1 crore house and how do we know he has no black money stashed away?
Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

Modi seems to be on the defensive on the wife issue. Now his older brother has issued an appeal to voters to continue to support him. Do you think Modi is getting desperate?
CONmen are the ones who are desperate now. That is why they (and you) are looking for anything and everything to find something wrong with him. The voters will punish you guys this time. They will be really pissed off if you go after Modi's wife because they have only admiration for her.

Nobody is going after Modi's wife; they are going after Modi. Meanwhile, Rahul is now targeting Modi on this issue:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms

Pappu is a fool. By harping about this issue he may be turning his own vote banks away. Instead, he should patao Titsa Sheethalwad, Javed Anand, some feminist activists, the UN and the US Human Rights groups to do the dirty work. Then, perhaps, some women voters may turn against Modi (but their fingers may still not be willing to press the CON-SP-BSP-RJD buttons on the EVMs).

by Guest Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:48 am

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Looks like you didn't read the article you posted.

Learn from MT and Pappu. They burnt their fingers trying to malign Modi in Gujrat elections.

Modi seems to be on the defensive on the wife issue. Now his older brother has issued an appeal to voters to continue to support him. Do you think Modi is getting desperate?
CONmen are the ones who are desperate now. That is why they (and you) are looking for anything and everything to find something wrong with him. The voters will punish you guys this time. They will be really pissed off if you go after Modi's wife because they have only admiration for her.

Nobody is going after Modi's wife; they are going after Modi. Meanwhile, Rahul is now targeting Modi on this issue:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/specials/gujarat-assembly-elections/Narendra-Modis-salary-less-than-govt-peons/articleshow/17434441.cms
Pappu is a fool. By harping about this issue he may be turning his own vote banks away. Instead, he should patao Titsa Sheethalwad, Javed Anand, some feminist activists, the UN and the US Human Rights groups to do the dirty work. Then, perhaps, some women voters may turn against Modi (but their fingers may still not be willing to press the CON-SP-BSP-RJD buttons on the EVMs).

Sorry I had given the wrong link earlier. This is the correct one:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/elections2014/state-of-the-states/rahul-rakes-up-modi-marriage-issue-to-attack-him/article1-1206917.aspx

"Don't know how many elections he (Modi) has contested till now, but he has revealed for the first time that he is married. In Delhi, he talks about honour of women, but his own wife's name doesn't reach the affidavit," Gandhi said at his first rally in Jammu and Kashmir this year.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:08 am

Seva Lamberdar wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Modis-marriage-a-social-formality-brother-says-Congress-threatens-legal-action/articleshow/33568895.cms

A man marries a woman at 17 and does not consummate the marriage. he leaves her for good after 3 months. No register marriage, no documentation, and n kids. Per hindu tradition, a husband who has disappeared for 7 years is considered dead and marriage ended. So technically Modi has been in a limbo - if he had claimed he was married, then he had no proof of marriage and had to explain his personal estrangment. So he never acknowledged or denied until now. Now that Jashodaben publicly claimed to be his wife, he came forward and acknowledged it.

This sure is a 1000 times more honest than MK who has 3 wives and visited prostitute all the time, Indira whose post-feroze stories are legendary. Now, how old was the western Italian wife of Rajiv when he was killed? hmmm....?...

And here is a synopsis of the dalliances of the Nehru family...

Sonia Gandhi had intense friendship with Madhavrao Scindia in the UK, which continued even after her marriage. One night at 2 AM in 1982, Madhavrao Scindia and Sonia Gandhi were caught alone together when their car met an accident near IIT Delhi main gate.

Will MT Sonia Mata ji come forward with her truths?

by nevada Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:38 am

Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

by confuzzled dude Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:46 am

truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.

TBT, Should I pat my own back for getting under your skin or feel sad? You're so disgusted with my anti-CBN stand that you're attributing any talk of crores to me. Don't fall into our resident spinmaster's trap believeing whatever balderdash he writes about my personal affliations Smile

by confuzzled dude Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:51 am

nevada wrote:Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

by smArtha Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:23 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
nevada wrote:Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.

by confuzzled dude Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:47 pm

smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
nevada wrote:Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.

I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:51 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
nevada wrote:Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.
I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.

I can see why T fellows are upset with settlers. You are blaming him for your own views on Varna Ashrama Dharma.

(RSS has a wider presence in T than MIM.)

by confuzzled dude Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:05 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
nevada wrote:Poor woman - she lived the life of an abandoned wife practically her whole life.

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.
I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.
I can see why T fellows are upset with settlers. You are blaming him for your own views on Varna Ashrama Dharma.

(RSS has a wider presence in T than MIM.)

Are we saying that Modiji is not bound by the principles of Grihasta Ashram, he was/is free to neglect his duties/responsibilities of a Grihast?

by smArtha Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:32 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:Are we saying that Modiji is not bound by the principles of Grihasta Ashram, he was/is free to neglect his duties/responsibilities of a Grihast?

Nope. Even by religion, you are only bound by the principle of the Ashrama that you are in. If you moved on to Sannyasa no dharma you are not bound by any dharma of the prior Grihasta stage. Buddha left wife, child and kingdom with no successor violating Grihastha Dharma, Putra Dharma and even Kshtra Dharma. But all that is forgiven for a higher cause and even looked up to.

by nevada Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:33 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:

Shhh.. If you're a genuine Hindu you wouldn't critic Ashrama Dharma. Modiji fast-tracked from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa stage.

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.
I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.
I can see why T fellows are upset with settlers. You are blaming him for your own views on Varna Ashrama Dharma.

(RSS has a wider presence in T than MIM.)
Are we saying that Modiji is not bound by the principles of Grihasta Ashram, he was/is free to neglect his duties/responsibilities of a Grihast?

Budha is revered as God even though he abandoned his wife and infant son. When he came back to the palace as a monk his wife begged him to stay back but he refused her request. BTW, T folks have the same understanding of Ashrama Dharma as anyone else. These concepts are ancient and transcend the T vs A divide. Muslim rulers may have subjugated the Hindus in Telangana but organizations such as Arya Samaj stood up to him and preserved Hindu culture.

by confuzzled dude Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:24 pm

nevada wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
smArtha wrote:

And it is very much valid to move from Brahmacharya to Sanyasa in Hinduism and in fact the culture places higher value on such life.
I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.
I can see why T fellows are upset with settlers. You are blaming him for your own views on Varna Ashrama Dharma.

(RSS has a wider presence in T than MIM.)
Are we saying that Modiji is not bound by the principles of Grihasta Ashram, he was/is free to neglect his duties/responsibilities of a Grihast?
Budha is revered as God even though he abandoned his wife and infant son. When he came back to the palace as a monk his wife begged him to stay back but he refused her request. BTW, T folks have the same understanding of Ashrama Dharma as anyone else. These concepts are ancient and transcend the T vs A divide. Muslim rulers may have subjugated the Hindus in Telangana but organizations such as Arya Samaj stood up to him and preserved Hindu culture.

C'mon man I was only pulling someones leg.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:56 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
nevada wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
I know but 'T' folks with all that Islam influence have hard time digesting Hindu Dharma concepts.
I can see why T fellows are upset with settlers. You are blaming him for your own views on Varna Ashrama Dharma.

(RSS has a wider presence in T than MIM.)
Are we saying that Modiji is not bound by the principles of Grihasta Ashram, he was/is free to neglect his duties/responsibilities of a Grihast?
Budha is revered as God even though he abandoned his wife and infant son. When he came back to the palace as a monk his wife begged him to stay back but he refused her request. BTW, T folks have the same understanding of Ashrama Dharma as anyone else. These concepts are ancient and transcend the T vs A divide. Muslim rulers may have subjugated the Hindus in Telangana but organizations such as Arya Samaj stood up to him and preserved Hindu culture.
C'mon man I was only pulling someones leg.

Try pulling MT's or Priyanka's leg in front of Vadra ji and CONguards and see what happens.

by Propagandhi711 Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:14 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:1.5 crores. CD that is less than a garage in Jagan reddy 's empire.
TBT, Should I pat my own back for getting under your skin or feel sad? You're so disgusted with my anti-CBN stand that you're attributing any talk of crores to me. Don't fall into our resident spinmaster's trap believeing whatever balderdash he writes about my personal affliations

spinmeister...that's you in a nutshell. admin is the ultimate, you do rank up there tho

by Sponsored content