Priyanka Gandhi defends her husband Vadra ji

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Surjewala said that there was BJP sponsored public interest litigation before the Allahabad high court in this regard and it was rejected in March 2013 by the court which said that the PIL was filed with a motive.  "Not satisfied with the verdict of the division bench of the High Court, members of Sangh Parivar and friends of Modi sponsored another litigation in the guise of a PIL in the Supreme Court. It was in fact a private interest litigation to help BJP."

hahaha...hohoho..... But the CONcrass (islam) forgets how it harps on Modi and 2002 riots despite Supreme Court giving a clean chit.  Why shouldn't the BJP go after Vadra?

I suggest that BJP restart allegations of Sonia Gi's illegal voting in 1982 and her dual passport issue - who cares which court says what.  Just give the CONcress (islam) in its own coin.

Suspect Modi ji must have read my post 2 days back and he has refocused on attacking CONmen corruption. If CONcress (islam) and secular-islamic friends can continue to openly seek votes from muslims, why cant BJP openly seek votes from the hindus.

The MP candidates should not ask votes in the name of religion so as to protect their seats. But all non-candidates should throw charges - again and again - against the Nehru clan and their corruption.

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Surjewala said that there was BJP sponsored public interest litigation before the Allahabad high court in this regard and it was rejected in March 2013 by the court which said that the PIL was filed with a motive.  "Not satisfied with the verdict of the division bench of the High Court, members of Sangh Parivar and friends of Modi sponsored another litigation in the guise of a PIL in the Supreme Court. It was in fact a private interest litigation to help BJP."

hahaha...hohoho..... But the CONcrass (islam) forgets how it harps on Modi and 2002 riots despite Supreme Court giving a clean chit.  Why shouldn't the BJP go after Vadra?

I suggest that BJP restart allegations of Sonia Gi's illegal voting in 1982 and her dual passport issue - who cares which court says what.  Just give the CONcress (islam) in its own coin.

Suspect Modi ji must have read my post 2 days back and he has refocused on attacking CONmen corruption. If CONcress (islam) and secular-islamic friends can continue to openly seek votes from muslims, why cant BJP openly seek votes from the hindus.

The MP candidates should not ask votes in the name of religion so as to protect their seats. But all non-candidates should throw charges - again and again - against the Nehru clan and their corruption.

Supreme Court has not given any clean chit to Modi; only a lower court (not even the High Court) has given a clean chit. The case has been appealed by Zakia Jaffery and is currently being heard by Gujarat High Court.