Modi's popularity on the wane

“Urban population is one that has higher and unrealistic expectations from the government. It is a volatile population that changes its stand. Initiatives taken by the Prime Minister like mann ki baat have given him an image of a talker more than doer and that is what may not be working in his favour,” Mrug said.

confuzzled dude wrote:

“Urban population is one that has higher and unrealistic expectations from the government. It is a volatile population that changes its stand. Initiatives taken by the Prime Minister like mann ki baat have given him an image of a talker more than doer and that is what may not be working in his favour,” Mrug said.

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

“Urban population is one that has higher and unrealistic expectations from the government. It is a volatile population that changes its stand. Initiatives taken by the Prime Minister like mann ki baat have given him an image of a talker more than doer and that is what may not be working in his favour,” Mrug said.

It is very easy to manufacture swings in these kind of ratings. All livemint has to do, is to get more monomaniacs (Political islamists) in their survey population. Livemint has many moles who are pathologically opposed to the BJP, so a skewed survey is quite possible. Mann is baat is a great initiative that he needs to keep up.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

“Urban population is one that has higher and unrealistic expectations from the government. It is a volatile population that changes its stand. Initiatives taken by the Prime Minister like mann ki baat have given him an image of a talker more than doer and that is what may not be working in his favour,” Mrug said.

It is very easy to manufacture swings in these kind of ratings. All livemint has to do, is to get more monomaniacs (Political islamists) in their survey population. Livemint has many moles who are pathologically opposed to the BJP, so a skewed survey is quite possible. Mann is baat is a great initiative that he needs to keep up.

When would blabbermouth Modi talks about his parties religious priorities, he seems to be more of a doer than talker when it comes to implementing religious initiatives.

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

“Urban population is one that has higher and unrealistic expectations from the government. It is a volatile population that changes its stand. Initiatives taken by the Prime Minister like mann ki baat have given him an image of a talker more than doer and that is what may not be working in his favour,” Mrug said.

It is very easy to manufacture swings in these kind of ratings. All livemint has to do, is to get more monomaniacs (Political islamists) in their survey population. Livemint has many moles who are pathologically opposed to the BJP, so a skewed survey is quite possible. Mann is baat is a great initiative that he needs to keep up.

When would blabbermouth Modi talks about his parties religious priorities, he seems to be more of a doer than talker when it comes to implementing religious initiatives.

His job is to provide development, governance and he is singularly focused on that. Just because fringe groups talk about something doesn't mean that he has to answer for every moron with idiotic views. 

Anyway, Congress PM's were even worse. They did not take any action against provocateurs even for teh acts they did. Satyadarshini (an openly anti-hindu and blasphemous literature was printed by Evangelists in AP). I do  not recollect Congress PM's answering for that. Even when Congress party president Sonia Gandhi led NAC came up with anti-constitutional anti-Hindu and anti-Sikh, communal violence bill, MMS did  not talk about that. '

Congress party does not have anything to oppose NDA to stall the bills, so they create issue out of nothing. 

Now look at Congress, which is now carrying on with Monomaniac appeasement to the extreme.
Congress CM like Siddaramaiah who instead of fixing Bangalore's ills is buys celebrating mass murderers birthday (Tipu), who forcibly converted Hindus, in South Karnataka, North Western Tamilnadu and Kerala.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

It is very easy to manufacture swings in these kind of ratings. All livemint has to do, is to get more monomaniacs (Political islamists) in their survey population. Livemint has many moles who are pathologically opposed to the BJP, so a skewed survey is quite possible. Mann is baat is a great initiative that he needs to keep up.

When would blabbermouth Modi talks about his parties religious priorities, he seems to be more of a doer than talker when it comes to implementing religious initiatives.

His job is to provide development, governance and he is singularly focused on that. Just because fringe groups talk about something doesn't mean that he has to answer for every moron with idiotic views. 

Anyway, Congress PM's were even worse. They did not take any action against provocateurs even for teh acts they did. Satyadarshini (an openly anti-hindu and blasphemous literature was printed by Evangelists in AP). I do  not recollect Congress PM's answering for that. Even when Congress party president Sonia Gandhi led NAC came up with anti-constitutional anti-Hindu and anti-Sikh, communal violence bill, MMS did  not talk about that. '

Congress party does not have anything to oppose NDA to stall the bills, so they create issue out of nothing. 

Now look at Congress, which is now carrying on with Monomaniac appeasement to the extreme.
Congress CM like Siddaramaiah who instead of fixing Bangalore's ills is buys celebrating mass murderers birthday (Tipu), who forcibly converted Hindus, in South Karnataka, North Western Tamilnadu and Kerala.

Who are you calling fringe groups, elected MPs representing BJP?

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

It is very easy to manufacture swings in these kind of ratings. All livemint has to do, is to get more monomaniacs (Political islamists) in their survey population. Livemint has many moles who are pathologically opposed to the BJP, so a skewed survey is quite possible. Mann is baat is a great initiative that he needs to keep up.

When would blabbermouth Modi talks about his parties religious priorities, he seems to be more of a doer than talker when it comes to implementing religious initiatives.

His job is to provide development, governance and he is singularly focused on that. Just because fringe groups talk about something doesn't mean that he has to answer for every moron with idiotic views. 

Anyway, Congress PM's were even worse. They did not take any action against provocateurs even for teh acts they did. Satyadarshini (an openly anti-hindu and blasphemous literature was printed by Evangelists in AP). I do  not recollect Congress PM's answering for that. Even when Congress party president Sonia Gandhi led NAC came up with anti-constitutional anti-Hindu and anti-Sikh, communal violence bill, MMS did  not talk about that. '

Congress party does not have anything to oppose NDA to stall the bills, so they create issue out of nothing. 

Now look at Congress, which is now carrying on with Monomaniac appeasement to the extreme.
Congress CM like Siddaramaiah who instead of fixing Bangalore's ills is buys celebrating mass murderers birthday (Tipu), who forcibly converted Hindus, in South Karnataka, North Western Tamilnadu and Kerala.

Who are you calling fringe groups, elected MPs representing BJP?

When an elected MP sadhvi Niranjan said something. Modi apologized and resolved it, although it was Amit Shah's who should have responded for it, not the PM. Modi heads the government and council of ministers. He is answerable and should intervene if any of  them say something unpalatable.
 
Sonia Gandhi was not just an elected MP but the president of a party. What did MMS do about it ?

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:
When would blabbermouth Modi talks about his parties religious priorities, he seems to be more of a doer than talker when it comes to implementing religious initiatives.

His job is to provide development, governance and he is singularly focused on that. Just because fringe groups talk about something doesn't mean that he has to answer for every moron with idiotic views. 

Anyway, Congress PM's were even worse. They did not take any action against provocateurs even for teh acts they did. Satyadarshini (an openly anti-hindu and blasphemous literature was printed by Evangelists in AP). I do  not recollect Congress PM's answering for that. Even when Congress party president Sonia Gandhi led NAC came up with anti-constitutional anti-Hindu and anti-Sikh, communal violence bill, MMS did  not talk about that. '

Congress party does not have anything to oppose NDA to stall the bills, so they create issue out of nothing. 

Now look at Congress, which is now carrying on with Monomaniac appeasement to the extreme.
Congress CM like Siddaramaiah who instead of fixing Bangalore's ills is buys celebrating mass murderers birthday (Tipu), who forcibly converted Hindus, in South Karnataka, North Western Tamilnadu and Kerala.

Who are you calling fringe groups, elected MPs representing BJP?

When an elected MP sadhvi Niranjan said something. Modi apologized and resolved it, although it was Amit Shah's who should have responded for it, not the PM. Modi heads the government and council of ministers. He is answerable and should intervene if any of  them say something unpalatable.
 
Sonia Gandhi was not just an elected MP but the president of a party. What did MMS do about it ?

Are u suggesting that Modi would have been nominated as a PM even if BJP had zero representation in  Loksabha? Btw, PM's role entails more than country's development, how can he assure development when he is hell bent on creating divisions among the citizens and treating certain sections as second class citizens

confuzzled dude wrote:Getting mad RE? There are several examples of him not treating all equally. He showed it when he meted out different treatment for Sikhs and Muslims ; honoring ones request to wear turban and denying others

rawemotions wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Getting mad RE? There are several examples of him not treating all equally. He showed it when he meted out different treatment for Sikhs and Muslims ; honoring ones request to wear turban and denying others

So wearing turban and not wearing skull cap is a sign of discrimination in laws ? 
I am sorry I am unable to answer when questions are being asked by such a "brilliant" mind!


The incompetence is on full display, when questions related to congress party's discriminatory laws is not being answered.  It is a colossal waste of time to argue further. This is the end of discussion as far as I am concerned.

truthbetold wrote:Cd
so when do you start celebrating? Did you announce a place of celebration?

Propagandhi711 wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Cd
so when do you start celebrating? Did you announce a place of celebration?

lotus pond residence, rd#86

confuzzled dude wrote:

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/hhl6D8qkLd1VjcAYda3Q1J/Modi-NDA-still-popular-with-India.html#nav=also_read

southindian wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/hhl6D8qkLd1VjcAYda3Q1J/Modi-NDA-still-popular-with-India.html#nav=also_read

You mean J&K and Chattisgarh wins happened 5 years ago?

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Cd
so when do you start celebrating? Did you announce a place of celebration?

lotus pond residence, rd#86

May be, Chanchalguda in Hyd or Dopidipuram near AP's new capital.

confuzzled dude wrote:

southindian wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

http://www.livemint.com/Politics/hhl6D8qkLd1VjcAYda3Q1J/Modi-NDA-still-popular-with-India.html#nav=also_read

You mean J&K and Chattisgarh wins happened 5 years ago?

Wins?! they ain't won nothing on their own strength.

NEW DELHI: Six months after Modi Sarkar assumed power amidst great expectations, many industrialists are concerned about what they see as a lack of boldness in reforms and an absence of radical ideas. As a result, they are largely unwilling to commit fresh investments in the country at a time the infrastructure sector is in a virtual logjam because of high debt.

"This government has moved us from despair to hope... but now I think that hope is waning," said GVK Power & Infrastructure Vice-Chairman Sanjay Reddy, according to people present at the meeting. "The government actually needs to take a bold line and has to say we are going to move away from the past. But we are not seeing that happening at the moment," added SRF Chairman Arun Bharat Ram, referring to labour reforms and the role of the public sector. "One of the biggest opponents to labour reforms is BJP's own trade union and if what we are going to see is every move being weighed politically, we are in the same boat as before," he added. 

southindian wrote:
LOL! Ignorance is bliss.

Oh you mean a weak opposition gave them the win?  When was the last time BJP got 25 seats in J&K?

Don't worry you will have a field day when BJP is down in future... but today is not that day, so your enthusiasm today is misplaced.

Live and Learn.

In substance, there is no denying Modi's BJP another moment of electoral success. Their political Ashwamedha Yagna is looking as unchallengeable in the Kaliyug as Bhagwan Shri Ram's in his enormously more virtuous Treta Yug. It has duly added one more state to its bag. More importantly, the state is chronically troubled but phenomenally promising-Jharkhand, which never voted for a majority in its 14 years of existence. But BJP's tally shows a loss of nearly 20 segments of the 56 it won in the Lok Sabha elections. The party hasn't quite conquered Kashmir either, failing to live up to its boast of 'Mission 44'. But it has succeeded in replacing the Congress as the leading national party there, thereby also confirming that the party's decline is pan-national as well as secular. Why are we still complaining?

While winds are still blowing BJP's way, Maharashtra and Jharkhand are the first indications of a weakening (though far from a shifting) momentum. The party fell way short of majority in Maharashtra, thereby failing in its gambit of dumping the Shiv Sena. The Jharkhand majority is marginal. Both tallies were way below the promise of its inhouse Kautilyas or pollster Chanakya. Even in the Kashmir valley, its 3 per cent vote share and forfeiture of deposit by all candidates but one is a good reality check. If you read these results along with the debacle in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan bypolls, you get the picture. The period when Modi's name was good enough to sweep an election, as exemplified notably by Haryana, is now passing.