Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inThere is nothing quite like Charlie Hebdo in America
Page 1 of 1
There is nothing quite like Charlie Hebdo in America
by Guest Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:56 pm
“It’s an old tradition of French satire to be particularly obscene and vulgar,” says Arthur Goldhammer, a French translator based at Harvard’s Center for European Studies. It “goes back to the days before the French revolution,” he says, “when the monarchy was mocked” in demeaning, even pornographic cartoons. Historians have argued that cartoonists’ undignified depictions of French royals in the eighteenth century lessened the prestige of the monarchy, helping pave the way for revolution.
There’s nothing quite like Charlie Hebdo in America. For better or worse, American humorists are more tightly constrained by the boundaries of political correctness; comedians are generally expected to take special precautions when joking about anything potentially sensitive, especially surrounding issues like race, religion or gender. “People have compared it to Jon Stewart, and it is as popular as something like that, but it’s also much more radical,” says Canadian journalist Jeet Heer, co-editor of Arguing Comics: Literary Masters on a Popular Medium.
As if to underline this contrast, American news outlets like CNN and AP have opted not to show Charlie Hebdo’s most controversial cartoons, and even The New York Daily News blurred out parts of the images. Arguably, the most controversial political cartoon of the past few years in the U.S. was a New Yorker cover showing Barack and Michelle Obama plotting a terrorist attack in the Oval Office (an artist’s attempt at satirizing Republicans who questioned Obama’s patriotism.) Compare that to the 2011 Charlie Hebdo cartoon in which God is sodomized by Jesus, and the Obama cover seems mild.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120717/charlie-hebdo-attacks-difference-between-american-and-french-satire
There’s nothing quite like Charlie Hebdo in America. For better or worse, American humorists are more tightly constrained by the boundaries of political correctness; comedians are generally expected to take special precautions when joking about anything potentially sensitive, especially surrounding issues like race, religion or gender. “People have compared it to Jon Stewart, and it is as popular as something like that, but it’s also much more radical,” says Canadian journalist Jeet Heer, co-editor of Arguing Comics: Literary Masters on a Popular Medium.
As if to underline this contrast, American news outlets like CNN and AP have opted not to show Charlie Hebdo’s most controversial cartoons, and even The New York Daily News blurred out parts of the images. Arguably, the most controversial political cartoon of the past few years in the U.S. was a New Yorker cover showing Barack and Michelle Obama plotting a terrorist attack in the Oval Office (an artist’s attempt at satirizing Republicans who questioned Obama’s patriotism.) Compare that to the 2011 Charlie Hebdo cartoon in which God is sodomized by Jesus, and the Obama cover seems mild.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120717/charlie-hebdo-attacks-difference-between-american-and-french-satire
Guest- Guest
Similar topics» An Article on Charlie Hebdo
» charlie hebdo - before the massacre
» Why there can never be a Charlie Hebdo in India
» Charlie Hebdo is done with prophet Muhammad cartoons
» Mani-Talk: The Controversy About My Remarks On Charlie Hebdo Attack
» charlie hebdo - before the massacre
» Why there can never be a Charlie Hebdo in India
» Charlie Hebdo is done with prophet Muhammad cartoons
» Mani-Talk: The Controversy About My Remarks On Charlie Hebdo Attack
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum