Pseudo secular tongues wagging

truthbetold wrote:Rash,

Are you saying it is OK if hundreds of millions of people live in poverty for years and decades and millions of young people never get an opportunity to get a job and you will be happy with pseudo secular talk that failed to change minority lives?

truthbetold wrote:Rash,

Indian growth after 1990 was dramatically different from pre 1990. That was due to change in license raj to liberal capitalism.  Again the failure of Indian from 2010 to 2014 was due to the economic mistakes committed by UPA govt due to sonia's pressure to push Rahul gandhi.  The policy error are not minor and forced by one type of political philosophy.

Good economy reduces poverty significantly as observed during the past 20 to 25 years.  

Improvement of 10 to 20% of people's lives is no simple matter to be brushed away by generic statement of 'neither laloo nor modi will eradicate poverty'.

Policies make a difference.  You are hiding behind a statement that has no practical meaning.

confuzzled dude wrote:Only an idiot with no basic understanding of recent events would wag his tongue. What has Modi done so far? He dodged a golden opportunity presented to India (last year) for his political ambitions. Modi, who vehemently opposed GST over the past decade made a U-turn now, for he delayed the progress of India by about decade, What good is it? And the feku package he offered to Bihar was nothing but a political bait. I wonder what makes you think this govt. is better than the previous one, even one chooses to ignore all the communal noise.

truthbetold wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Only an idiot with no basic understanding of recent events would wag his tongue. What has Modi done so far? He dodged a golden opportunity presented to India (last year) for his political ambitions. Modi, who vehemently opposed GST over the past decade made a U-turn now, for he delayed the progress of India by about decade, What good is it? And the feku package he offered to Bihar was nothing but a political bait. I wonder what makes you think this govt. is better than the previous one, even one chooses to ignore all the communal noise.

Instead of making baseless statements, look at GDP.  It moved from 4 to 5 in last years of UPA to 7% and higher.  Budget deficit came down, inflation in in control, and corruption absent from top levels. All top investing reviewers around the world including OECD, IMF ,  Moody's, and many others recognize india as the one country with real hope of growth in an otherwise bleak world wide economic outlook.  Make in India, FDI in defence,  new investments in Railways, roadways, and ports and many other infrastructure initiatives are creating the base for faster growth.  

You constantly carp about Modi's foreign visits. India is now getting one of the highest FDI in world and is in same league with China and US to attract FDI.

You make up your own numbers and issue bombastic nonsense such as feku and no development.   That makes your argument non credible.  Get facts and numbers. Then we can talk.

truthbetold wrote:
Instead of making baseless statements, look at GDP.  It moved from 4 to 5 in last years of UPA to 7% and higher.  Budget deficit came down, inflation in in control, and corruption absent from top levels. All top investing reviewers around the world including OECD, IMF ,  Moody's, and many others recognize india as the one country with real hope of growth in an otherwise bleak world wide economic outlook.  Make in India, FDI in defence,  new investments in Railways, roadways, and ports and many other infrastructure initiatives are creating the base for faster growth.  

You constantly carp about Modi's foreign visits. India is now getting one of the highest FDI in world and is in same league with China and US to attract FDI.

You make up your own numbers and issue bombastic nonsense such as feku and no development.   That makes your argument non credible.  Get facts and numbers. Then we can talk.

“However, we believe it will be premature to extrapolate the recent upsurge in FDI as concrete proof of a revival in the investment cycle or aiding the objective of ‘Make in India’ campaign. Further, the disaggregated data on FDI inflow and outflow (greenfield and cross border M&A) indicates a much different picture compared to the general perception,” it said.

Emkay further said that in contrast to India’s over indulgence with FDI flows to resuscitate domestic investment cycle, global trends since 2007 show a consistent decline in the relevance of FDI and other external flows in funding investments.

Kris wrote:>>>CD,

If anyone has a single track agenda, I will submit it is you with the preoccupation with the nullification of an election. To wit: Modi did not live with his wife, NRI welcome has worn out for him(!), Modi has not gotten massive investments within his first year- epic fail! (oh, never mind the country's history under the opposition)  etc. etc. 

The previous discussion was about investor psychology in the face of a potentially paralyzed government.  It was about what investors are looking for. Much as you may not want to believe it, they are focused on their ROI and that is pretty much it. If you are under the impression that the world economic conditions and needs will remain static and India will be a perennial investors'  favorite and the 'window of opportunity' is just a bogeyman argument, there is no way of refuting that denial mode.  

Whether you like it or not, people want economic advancement. It is a matter of paramount concern. No, it does not happen overnight and the population is not gullible enough to believe this, especially one that has lived in a leftist "utopia" for  a good portion of its history. Much of that history was presided over by the opposition, to state the obvious.  If Mode doesn't perform,  I am sure he will get the boot. If he does, he will get re-elected. I am not as emotionally vested in this is as you seem to be. Given that context, this subject is getting a tad tiring. I guess I am just an investor too, albeit in a very small manner. Good luck.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Kris wrote:>>>CD,

If anyone has a single track agenda, I will submit it is you with the preoccupation with the nullification of an election. To wit: Modi did not live with his wife, NRI welcome has worn out for him(!), Modi has not gotten massive investments within his first year- epic fail! (oh, never mind the country's history under the opposition)  etc. etc. 

The previous discussion was about investor psychology in the face of a potentially paralyzed government.  It was about what investors are looking for. Much as you may not want to believe it, they are focused on their ROI and that is pretty much it. If you are under the impression that the world economic conditions and needs will remain static and India will be a perennial investors'  favorite and the 'window of opportunity' is just a bogeyman argument, there is no way of refuting that denial mode.  

Whether you like it or not, people want economic advancement. It is a matter of paramount concern. No, it does not happen overnight and the population is not gullible enough to believe this, especially one that has lived in a leftist "utopia" for  a good portion of its history. Much of that history was presided over by the opposition, to state the obvious.  If Mode doesn't perform,  I am sure he will get the boot. If he does, he will get re-elected. I am not as emotionally vested in this is as you seem to be. Given that context, this subject is getting a tad tiring. I guess I am just an investor too, albeit in a very small manner. Good luck.

That ship has sailed last year when Sri Modiji decided to be not so bold with reforms (for his political future) so no point harping on the window of opportunity that has already left us.

truthbetold wrote:So the pseudo seculars are out in full force in India media and here on such forum.

They deserve a moment in sun that is gifted to them by suicidal BJP and stupid no clue brahmacharis of RSS.

But it is time to ask these pseudos some questions?

Who are the gods of  confused , merlot sipping , rash maximum pseudo seculars?

Laloo,  Rahul, Jagan, Maran and Sonia.

But these same pseudos refused to answer questions about their past governance.  

What is their answer to proven failures of past governance in Bihar, at national level, and multitude of corruption scandal?

What about dynastic rule?

Is corruption, dynastic rule and incompetence better than secular infractions?

Is 60 years of hindu growth rate satisfactory? Are the failed policies of 60 a possible alternative to evolving Modi policies?

Let us see if the pseudos have the balls to own up to their gods and tell us why their gods are better than feku 56 inch modi?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Kris wrote:>>>CD,

If anyone has a single track agenda, I will submit it is you with the preoccupation with the nullification of an election. To wit: Modi did not live with his wife, NRI welcome has worn out for him(!), Modi has not gotten massive investments within his first year- epic fail! (oh, never mind the country's history under the opposition)  etc. etc. 

The previous discussion was about investor psychology in the face of a potentially paralyzed government.  It was about what investors are looking for. Much as you may not want to believe it, they are focused on their ROI and that is pretty much it. If you are under the impression that the world economic conditions and needs will remain static and India will be a perennial investors'  favorite and the 'window of opportunity' is just a bogeyman argument, there is no way of refuting that denial mode.  

Whether you like it or not, people want economic advancement. It is a matter of paramount concern. No, it does not happen overnight and the population is not gullible enough to believe this, especially one that has lived in a leftist "utopia" for  a good portion of its history. Much of that history was presided over by the opposition, to state the obvious.  If Mode doesn't perform,  I am sure he will get the boot. If he does, he will get re-elected. I am not as emotionally vested in this is as you seem to be. Given that context, this subject is getting a tad tiring. I guess I am just an investor too, albeit in a very small manner. Good luck.

That ship has sailed last year when Sri Modiji decided not to be bold with reforms (for his political future) so no point harping on the window of opportunity that has already left us. My point was other standard opportunities will come despite communal tensions and the onus is on the leader of the country to break the gridlock/paralyzation, great leaders thrive in these situations let's see how great Modiji will turn into

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

If Modi could not pass GST other bills, it is mainly due to the stalling of the proceedings by Cong(i) - how come no one mentions that "patriotic" action by the Cong (intolerant) ?
 

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Kris wrote:>>>CD,

If anyone has a single track agenda, I will submit it is you with the preoccupation with the nullification of an election. To wit: Modi did not live with his wife, NRI welcome has worn out for him(!), Modi has not gotten massive investments within his first year- epic fail! (oh, never mind the country's history under the opposition)  etc. etc. 

The previous discussion was about investor psychology in the face of a potentially paralyzed government.  It was about what investors are looking for. Much as you may not want to believe it, they are focused on their ROI and that is pretty much it. If you are under the impression that the world economic conditions and needs will remain static and India will be a perennial investors'  favorite and the 'window of opportunity' is just a bogeyman argument, there is no way of refuting that denial mode.  

Whether you like it or not, people want economic advancement. It is a matter of paramount concern. No, it does not happen overnight and the population is not gullible enough to believe this, especially one that has lived in a leftist "utopia" for  a good portion of its history. Much of that history was presided over by the opposition, to state the obvious.  If Mode doesn't perform,  I am sure he will get the boot. If he does, he will get re-elected. I am not as emotionally vested in this is as you seem to be. Given that context, this subject is getting a tad tiring. I guess I am just an investor too, albeit in a very small manner. Good luck.

That ship has sailed last year when Sri Modiji decided not to be bold with reforms (for his political future) so no point harping on the window of opportunity that has already left us. My point was other standard opportunities will come despite communal tensions and the onus is on the leader of the country to break the gridlock/paralyzation, great leaders thrive in these situations let's see how great Modiji will turn into

If Modi could not pass GST other bills, it is mainly due to the stalling of the proceedings by Cong(i) - how come no one mentions that "patriotic" action by the Cong (intolerant) ?

Modi has accomplished much more in 2 years than Intolerant Cong accomplished in 5 years.

So again for the Nth time...who do you propose as an alternative to Modi ?  

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

So again for the Nth time...who do you propose as an alternative to Modi ?  

By virtue of opposing GST bill ( which was architected by UPA) for nearly 10 years, Modi delayed country's progress by a decade. So enough of this opposition blocked bull.

truthbetold wrote:Merlot
Calling cd, rash, Kris, and uppili idiots to respondto this post shows how mature you are. Other than calling people names you never contribute anything useful anyway. The fact is you do not have anything sensible to say beyond describing your melting heart for afzal guru. Run and hide behind your standard boring innanities such as 1000 word essay or Upps aunty or nri patriots.

Kris wrote:
>>> India is still on the radar considering the world's situation right now,  However, that may not suit the narrative of the 'Modi recall' crowd. Party on!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/globalbusiness/11983368/Dont-let-us-miss-the-opportunity-India-offers.html

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

So again for the Nth time...who do you propose as an alternative to Modi ?  

By virtue of opposing GST bill ( which was architected by UPA) for nearly 10 years, Modi delayed country's progress by a decade. So enough of this opposition blocked bull.

WHO DO YOU PROPOSE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO MODI ?...????

truthbetold wrote:Cd
looters like laloo and jagan are ok for you but if jaitly makes an error while trying to do something he is a failure.

You come up with some partisan criticism of modi's numbers and try to establish them as equal to widely accepted statistics. Ex: fdi.

Numbers do not lie as much as partisans do.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Communal goons like Modi, Advani are never an alternative, neither the BJP party with its current ideology

smArtha wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Communal goons like Modi, Advani are never an alternative, neither the BJP party with its current ideology

Yes we need a 'fertile' Dynasty or Family to give us Rulers for each generation. If there is a dead Dad and his Son who can indulge in perpetual 'odArpu' even better qualification. They would sanction the change of demographics via their very 'tolerant' conversion programs. Within 100 years the citizens of the country will become members of the religion of 'Covert Love' or that of 'Overt Peace'.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Merlot
Calling cd, rash, Kris, and uppili idiots to respondto this post shows how mature you are. Other than calling people names you never contribute anything useful anyway. The fact is you do not have anything sensible to say beyond describing your melting heart for afzal guru. Run and hide behind your standard boring innanities such as 1000 word essay or Upps aunty or nri patriots.

Unkil, stop hallucinating. If you want to call Upps Aunty or somebody else an idiot, do it yourself, like a man. Don't put words in my mouth.

truthbetold wrote:CD

You have no qualms calling Advani, modi names. But could not get yourself to say one little negative thing about Jagan.  That is very objective of you. Then you turn around and point fingers about other people's objectivity. Talk about hypocrisy.

truthbetold wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Only an idiot with no basic understanding of recent events would wag his tongue. What has Modi done so far? He dodged a golden opportunity presented to India (last year) for his political ambitions. Modi, who vehemently opposed GST over the past decade made a U-turn now, for he delayed the progress of India by about decade, What good is it? And the feku package he offered to Bihar was nothing but a political bait. I wonder what makes you think this govt. is better than the previous one, even one chooses to ignore all the communal noise.

Instead of making baseless statements, look at GDP.  It moved from 4 to 5 in last years of UPA to 7% and higher.  Budget deficit came down, inflation in in control, and corruption absent from top levels. All top investing reviewers around the world including OECD, IMF ,  Moody's, and many others recognize india as the one country with real hope of growth in an otherwise bleak world wide economic outlook.  Make in India, FDI in defence,  new investments in Railways, roadways, and ports and many other infrastructure initiatives are creating the base for faster growth.  

You constantly carp about Modi's foreign visits. India is now getting one of the highest FDI in world and is in same league with China and US to attract FDI.

You make up your own numbers and issue bombastic nonsense such as feku and no development.   That makes your argument non credible.  Get facts and numbers. Then we can talk.

Weak capital investment has been a hurdle in India's quest to realise its growth potential and with factories running 30 percent below capacity, private companies are in no rush to invest in new projects.

"On the growth front, the central concern is with investments," said Rajan, who was speaking at a business event in Hong Kong on Friday. "Private investment has fallen back quite a bit and so has public investment."

MUMBAI: India's economic growth in FY'17 is expected to be driven by consumption growth due to the impending pay revision of government employees. This would reverse the trend of FY'16 in which growth has been largely investment driven, said a report by British Bank Stanchart.

While higher government spending on salaries will benefit consumption, the diversion of resources is likely to slow India's investment recovery, which has been driven entirely by government capital expenditure. This is going to impact the fiscal numbers according to the writers. "We expect the fiscal burden to be borne mostly by the central government, as it will implement the pay revisions in the first year (FY17), when it also aims to reduce the fiscal deficit by 0.4% of GDP to 3.5% of GDP."