Narendra Modi is splurging tax payer money on PR companies. Good use of Tax Payer Money?

seven wrote:Good PR is important business. If govt is trying to hire good reputed PR firms, what is wrong with that?

Is she suggesting that her firm doesn't do quality work to deserve good money? Why is she suggesting it's not good use of tax payers money?

People should know the facts about how our govt is doing and how our tax money is helping our country grow. And who best to do the job than a good PR firm. They should present us with the facts in the right light. 

When other countries see India in good light, they will invest in India and it will be good for everyone. 

I'm so glad no one is able to find anything on Modi other than mocking his foreign trips. Because that's not even a bad thing.

Rashmun wrote:

seven wrote:Good PR is important business. If govt is trying to hire good reputed PR firms, what is wrong with that?

Is she suggesting that her firm doesn't do quality work to deserve good money? Why is she suggesting it's not good use of tax payers money?

People should know the facts about how our govt is doing and how our tax money is helping our country grow. And who best to do the job than a good PR firm. They should present us with the facts in the right light. 

When other countries see India in good light, they will invest in India and it will be good for everyone. 

I'm so glad no one is able to find anything on Modi other than mocking his foreign trips. Because that's not even a bad thing.

she is a writer with the Washington Post newspaper. she is saying its not a good idea for Modi to splurge tax payer money on PR companies who in turn contact journalists and lobby to get good publicity. she is indicating that it would be better for Modi to spend that money on developmental work in India like providing food clothing and shelter to the poor; and ensuring good health care, sanitation facilities, clean drinking water, etc. for Indian citizens.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

seven wrote:Good PR is important business. If govt is trying to hire good reputed PR firms, what is wrong with that?

Is she suggesting that her firm doesn't do quality work to deserve good money? Why is she suggesting it's not good use of tax payers money?

People should know the facts about how our govt is doing and how our tax money is helping our country grow. And who best to do the job than a good PR firm. They should present us with the facts in the right light. 

When other countries see India in good light, they will invest in India and it will be good for everyone. 

I'm so glad no one is able to find anything on Modi other than mocking his foreign trips. Because that's not even a bad thing.

she is a writer with the Washington Post newspaper. she is saying its not a good idea for Modi to splurge tax payer money on PR companies who in turn contact journalists and lobby to get good publicity. she is indicating that it would be better for Modi to spend that money on developmental work in India like providing food clothing and shelter to the poor; and ensuring good health care, sanitation facilities, clean drinking water, etc. for Indian citizens.

wapo scribes have journalism background from state schools. what kinda fukwitz (other than you) takes their recommendations seriously for governments? on second thoughts she's white so for sikular fukular congress supporters that gives her all the credibility in the world.

Rashmun wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

seven wrote:Good PR is important business. If govt is trying to hire good reputed PR firms, what is wrong with that?

Is she suggesting that her firm doesn't do quality work to deserve good money? Why is she suggesting it's not good use of tax payers money?

People should know the facts about how our govt is doing and how our tax money is helping our country grow. And who best to do the job than a good PR firm. They should present us with the facts in the right light. 

When other countries see India in good light, they will invest in India and it will be good for everyone. 

I'm so glad no one is able to find anything on Modi other than mocking his foreign trips. Because that's not even a bad thing.

she is a writer with the Washington Post newspaper. she is saying its not a good idea for Modi to splurge tax payer money on PR companies who in turn contact journalists and lobby to get good publicity. she is indicating that it would be better for Modi to spend that money on developmental work in India like providing food clothing and shelter to the poor; and ensuring good health care, sanitation facilities, clean drinking water, etc. for Indian citizens.

wapo scribes have journalism background from state schools. what kinda fukwitz (other than you) takes their recommendations seriously for governments? on second thoughts she's white so for sikular fukular congress supporters that gives her all the credibility in the world.

don't forget that PR companies hired by Narendra Modi contacted this reporter. Clearly they take WaPo journalists seriously.

truthbetold wrote:Is govt spending money for the tours of Rahul Gandhi between 2004 and 2014 ok? Why were you not talking about it then?

Rashmun wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Is govt spending money for the tours of Rahul Gandhi between 2004 and 2014 ok? Why were you not talking about it then?

i am not aware of this. I don't recall even the BJP raising this issue. If you can produce evidence of govt. money being used by Rahul Gandhi then i will join you in criticizing Rahul. By the way i have called Rahul a duffer in the past:

https://such.forumotion.com/t33707-the-duffer?highlight=duffer

So it is not that i have refrained from criticizing Rahul.