Nehru, Bose, letter and Congress Criminal Legacy

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:04 pm

...The letter, dated December 27, 1945, is addressed to Britain’s then Prime Minister Clement Attlee and says: “Dear Mr Attlee, I understand from reliable sources that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory by Stalin. This is a clear treachery and betrayal of faith by the Russians as Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, which she should not have done. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit." The letter is signed: "Yours Sincerely, Jawaharlal Nehru".

The letter is believed to be among the 100 files on Bose, popularly known as 'Netaji, declassified by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday.

What a shame...Nehru being a traitor and Congress lying to the country to cover up its criminal antecedents.

by Thanjai Nalankilli Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:25 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

...The letter, dated December 27, 1945, is addressed to Britain’s then Prime Minister Clement Attlee and says: “Dear Mr Attlee, I understand from reliable sources that Subhas Chandra Bose, your war criminal, has been allowed to enter Russian territory by Stalin. This is a clear treachery and betrayal of faith by the Russians as Russia has been an ally of the British-Americans, which she should not have done. Please take note of it and do what you consider proper and fit." The letter is signed: "Yours Sincerely, Jawaharlal Nehru".

The letter is believed to be among the 100 files on Bose, popularly known as 'Netaji, declassified by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday.

What a shame...Nehru being a traitor and Congress lying to the country to cover up its criminal antecedents.

Poopili, did you know that Shashi Tharoor and Ramachandra Guha have dismissed this so called letter of Nehru as a forgery? i bet the letter was concocted by bhaktas like you.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:17 pm

....Congress on the defensive. Congress controlled all commissions and omitted everything, while its successive governments routinely lied about Bose. Now they are caught with their pants and panties down.

by Merlot Daruwala Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:28 pm

Don't get so excited, Upps Aunty. If Nehru wrote the letter, it should be available in the British govt archives of the time. Unlike the Indian govt, their archives are easily accessible and they have nothing to gain by hiding that document.

PS: Very entertaining to watch chaddis try and appropriate every dictatorial figure they can find from the Congress fold, each one known to be staunchly anti-RSS in their lifetime!

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:38 pm

i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:34 pm

Nehru's letter calls Bose a "War Criminal" and expresses displeasure at Britain's ally Russia to give a home to the "War Criminal - Bose"

Question:

Is Bose a Criminal ?

If not is Nehru a Criminal and a traitor?

by Thanjai Nalankilli Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:44 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/jawaharlal-nehru-netaji-letter-england-pm-clement-attlee-fake-ramachandra-guha/1/578210.html

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:55 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.

This news item gives a summary of the story..

Notice that even way back in 1971 a commission noted the deposition by Nehru's Stenographer about his writing a letter to Attlee calling Bose a "war Criminal" The controversial letter - which the congress calls a fake - states exactly what the stenographer deposed 45 years ago.

The old-time stenographer has more credibility than ANY of the Cong(i) members today.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:59 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.

Chaddies are desperate to paint Nehru as anti-national, pro-muslim and a weak PM. They want current generation to believe that Bose would've made a better PM (even though his views are as socialistic as Nehru's, if not more).

by rawemotions Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:37 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.
Chaddies are desperate to paint Nehru as anti-national, pro-muslim and a weak PM. They want current generation to believe that Bose would've made a better PM (even though his views are as socialistic as Nehru's, if not more).

Except Gandhi, not a single PCC actually nominated Nehru for Congress President. But MK Gandhi prevailed over Sardar Patel, and asked him to abdicate his right in favor of Nehru. Nehru was probably more qualified to be FM, rather than PM, a fact conceded by Maulana Azad himself.

http://bharatuntoldstory.tumblr.com/post/32806564503/how-sardar-patel-did-not-become-first-pm-of

Excerpts
Still 12 out of 15 Pradesh Congress Committees, the only legal bodies having power to nominate and elect President of the Party, nominated Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:29 pm

rawemotions wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.
Chaddies are desperate to paint Nehru as anti-national, pro-muslim and a weak PM. They want current generation to believe that Bose would've made a better PM (even though his views are as socialistic as Nehru's, if not more).
Except Gandhi, not a single PCC actually nominated Nehru for Congress President. But MK Gandhi prevailed over Sardar Patel, and asked him to abdicate his right in favor of Nehru. Nehru was probably more qualified to be FM, rather than PM, a fact conceded by Maulana Azad himself.

http://bharatuntoldstory.tumblr.com/post/32806564503/how-sardar-patel-did-not-become-first-pm-of

Excerpts
Still 12 out of 15 Pradesh Congress Committees, the only legal bodies having power to nominate and elect President of the Party, nominated Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

Inconvenient facts regarding Nehru clan don't go well with the anti-national farts.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:19 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
rawemotions wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:i see bose's name buzzing around a lot lately but haven't taken the pains to look into the reasons for the chaddis' recent excitement about bose. a shorty summary explainer will be much appreciated.
Chaddies are desperate to paint Nehru as anti-national, pro-muslim and a weak PM. They want current generation to believe that Bose would've made a better PM (even though his views are as socialistic as Nehru's, if not more).
Except Gandhi, not a single PCC actually nominated Nehru for Congress President. But MK Gandhi prevailed over Sardar Patel, and asked him to abdicate his right in favor of Nehru. Nehru was probably more qualified to be FM, rather than PM, a fact conceded by Maulana Azad himself.

http://bharatuntoldstory.tumblr.com/post/32806564503/how-sardar-patel-did-not-become-first-pm-of

Excerpts
Still 12 out of 15 Pradesh Congress Committees, the only legal bodies having power to nominate and elect President of the Party, nominated Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

Inconvenient facts regarding Nehru clan don't go well with the anti-national farts.

Exactly! looks at any chaddi, they don't hesitate to ditch their principles for their personal safety.

http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1503/15031150.htm
http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/2004/16-30Apr04-Print-Edition/1604200443.htm

And about Bose, given his track record (aligning with Japan & Germany), I'm convinced the he (had he become PM) would've made wrong choices and turned India into a Pakistan way before what Pakistan had become into what it is. IMO, there should an asterisk next to his name given his affiliations with rogue states.

by truthbetold Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:09 pm

CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:22 pm

truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.

I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:59 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.

Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:25 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.

Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:41 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

Confuzzled Comrade with half-baked knowledge, Mullah Omar who headed the Taliban was *NOT* one of the Mujahideen commanders.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:42 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?
Confuzzled Comrade with half-baked knowledge, Mullah Omar who headed the Taliban was *NOT* one of the Mujahideen commanders.

Smartass HA, don't try too hard to teach us revisionist history.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:45 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?
Confuzzled Comrade with half-baked knowledge, Mullah Omar who headed the Taliban was *NOT* one of the Mujahideen commanders.
Smartass HA, don't try too hard to teach us revisionist history.

Confuzzled Comrade, who is 'us'? Are you having delusions of grandeur and referring to yourself in plural? Or you and your former comrades?

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:18 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:36 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

You certainly are an ass. Bose was a nationalist and he aligned with the enemy of enemy of his people. His methods were different from Gandhi and Nehru. But your irrational projection of Bose's future actions are as idiotic as they can get. You have to learn shut the fuck up if you do not know about the topic. Keep your verbal farts limited to Jagan's future.
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.

Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:40 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
I would put a lot of faith in Mahatma Gandhi's actions than some clueless person's words who was born decades after India got independence. Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.
Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!

Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:43 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Comrade, in your confuzzled state you are mixing up the Mujahideen with the Taliban which was formed after your former comrades abandoned Afghanistan.The Taliban waged war against the Mujahideen factions during the civil war.
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.
Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!
Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?

half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:49 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Smartass HA, Who was Mullah Omar?! and are these the same (Mujahideen) freedom fighters whom you seem to LOVE so much that created all the bloodshed in Kashmir?

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.
Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!
Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?
half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?

More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:52 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

How did I miss this Gem from you?

Taleban was NOWHERE on the picture when Reagan stepped down in 1989. I can give you a lesson, but it will be no use. So google or Wiki for info and learn yourself - that will be more effective, if at all.
Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!
Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?
half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?
More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.

More diversion and lying through teeth.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:59 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Looks who is talking, someone that screams everyday that all the muslims in the world are one and the same sayeth Mujahideen and Taliban are not cut from the same the cloth, is there any bigger joke than this!
Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?
half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?
More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
More diversion and lying through teeth.

Ha ha! Can't defend your statement, so you try to go on the offensive. Good luck with your half-baked knowledge, Confuzzled Comrade!

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:06 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Trying obfuscation to cover up your half-baked knowledge proclamations, Confuzzled Comrade? Will you next be saying that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the same?
half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?
More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
More diversion and lying through teeth.
Ha ha! Can't defend your statement, so you try to go on the offensive. Good luck with your half-baked knowledge, Confuzzled Comrade!

Stop acting like an idiot, everyone and their brother knows that seeds of Taliban were sown by Washington.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:08 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
half-baked what? You didn't answer my question, why did your favorite freedom fighters endorsed by your favorite leader created mayhem in J&K?
More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power.
More diversion and lying through teeth.
Ha ha! Can't defend your statement, so you try to go on the offensive. Good luck with your half-baked knowledge, Confuzzled Comrade!
Stop acting like an idiot, everyone and their brother knows that seeds of Taliban were sown by Washington.

Confuzzled Comrade, stop twisting yourself like a pretzel in trying to defend your half-baked statements.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:18 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
More obfuscation to cover up your half-baked proclamation, Confuzzled Comrade?

More diversion and lying through teeth.
Ha ha! Can't defend your statement, so you try to go on the offensive. Good luck with your half-baked knowledge, Confuzzled Comrade!
Stop acting like an idiot, everyone and their brother knows that seeds of Taliban were sown by Washington.
Confuzzled Comrade, stop twisting yourself like a pretzel in trying to defend your half-baked statements.

You never had anything substantial to contribute on any of the discussions other than picking on inane stuff. What you're contending is semantics in my statement which doesn't make my statement a fallacy.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:22 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
More diversion and lying through teeth.
Ha ha! Can't defend your statement, so you try to go on the offensive. Good luck with your half-baked knowledge, Confuzzled Comrade!
Stop acting like an idiot, everyone and their brother knows that seeds of Taliban were sown by Washington.
Confuzzled Comrade, stop twisting yourself like a pretzel in trying to defend your half-baked statements.
You never had anything substantial to contribute on any of the discussions other than picking on inane stuff. What you're contending is semantics in my statement which doesn't make my statement a fallacy.

Comrade you are as fanatic as you say are the people you criticize with your constant negative Nellie mantra of Modi bad, BJP bad, Islamic terrorists are justified blah blah.

No one can say anything to a fanatic like you except watch you with amusement.

by truthbetold Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:27 pm

CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.

by confuzzled dude Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:35 pm

truthbetold wrote:CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.

You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.

by Hellsangel Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:38 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.
You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.

Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:00 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.
You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.
Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.

Says who?

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:30 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.
You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.
Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.
Says who?

Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:41 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
truthbetold wrote:CD,

It takes guts to admit when you are wrong.
You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.
Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.
Says who?
Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?

Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:45 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
You should check the facts before making grandiose statements. One of the Mujahideen leaders formed Taliban.
Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.
Says who?
Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?
Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?

Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:50 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Wrong. Mullah Omar was never a Mujahideen commander.
Says who?
Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?
Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?
Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.

Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:56 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Says who?
Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?
Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?
Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.
Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.

That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:03 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Why don't you look it up, Confuzzled Comrade?
Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?
Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.
Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.
That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.

So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:12 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Why don't you, the-dishonest-member-of-SuCH?
Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.
Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.
That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.
So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?

A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:17 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Oh I have , Confuzzled Comrade who cannot admit you are making half-baked statements.

Mullah Omar only rose to prominence as a leader, against all the former Mujahideen that the Taliban ultimately defeated during the Afghan civil war much after Reagan's term. But continue patting yourself on the back for making half-baked statements.
Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.
That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.
So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?
A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?

How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.

Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:21 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Are you saying that he did not participate in Afghan-Soviet war? Keep repeating the phrase half-baked only makes you look insecure.
That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.
So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?
A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?
How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.
Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power

The fact that Taliban did not even exist during Reagan's term, Confuzzled Comrade. I wasn't the only one to point that out.

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:26 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
That doesn't make him a Mujahideen commander, Confuzzled Comrade.
So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?
A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?
How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.
Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power
The fact that Taliban did not even exist during Reagan's term, Confuzzled Comrade. I wasn't the only one to point that out.

Now, instead of acting like a 4-year old brat, go back with your tail between your legs to save face

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:29 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
So, that doesn't qualify him as a freedom fighter? and, all those tens of thousands that fought against Soviet and lost lives aren't freedom fighters, was Reagan lying through his teeth, then?
A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?
How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.
Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power
The fact that Taliban did not even exist during Reagan's term, Confuzzled Comrade. I wasn't the only one to point that out.
Now, instead of acting like a 4-year old brat, go back with your tail between your legs to save face

Ha ha! Can't admit you are wrong, so you play the indignant, self-righteous know-it-all, Confuzzled Comrade?

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:32 am

Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
A-ha,moving the goal post now, Confuzzled Comrade?
How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.
Taliban were called freedom fighters by Reagan, look how things turned out after they got into power
The fact that Taliban did not even exist during Reagan's term, Confuzzled Comrade. I wasn't the only one to point that out.
Now, instead of acting like a 4-year old brat, go back with your tail between your legs to save face
Ha ha! Can't admit you are wrong, so you play the indignant, self-righteous know-it-all, Confuzzled Comrade?

At least, I know a bit, unlike you, who is picking on semantics not the message (clear sign of a loser)

https://such.forumotion.com/t26117-operation-cyclone-a-militant-production-factory

by Hellsangel Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:35 am

confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
How so? This was my original comment, which you're nitpicking on since yesterday.

The fact that Taliban did not even exist during Reagan's term, Confuzzled Comrade. I wasn't the only one to point that out.
Now, instead of acting like a 4-year old brat, go back with your tail between your legs to save face
Ha ha! Can't admit you are wrong, so you play the indignant, self-righteous know-it-all, Confuzzled Comrade?
At least, I know a bit, unlike you, who is picking on semantics not the message (clear sign of a loser)

https://such.forumotion.com/t26117-operation-cyclone-a-militant-production-factory

Ha ha! Now emulating Trump with your delusions of grandeur and self-referential posts, Comrade?

Yes. You know a bit. Only a bit. Some honesty at last.

by confuzzled dude Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:41 am

Hmmm. Honesty & HA in a same sentence?!

by southindian Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:50 am

confuzzled dude wrote:Hmmm. Honesty & HA in a same sentence?!

Hmmm. Does Honesty go together with CD?

Dammit... even the alphabets don't go together.

by Sponsored content