Why media hates Modi

by seven Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:17 am

Pronoy Roy (head of NDTV) is married to Radhika Roy. Radhika Roy is the sister of Brinda Karat of CPI(M). Brinda Karat is the wife of Prakash Karat , ex-head of CPI(M)
Barkha Dutt of NDTV is currently married to Haseeb Ahmed Drabu, who is a PDP politician from J&K
Nidhi Razdan of NDTV is live-in partner of Omar Abdullah, former CM of J&K
Sonia Singh of NDTV is married to RPN Singh of Cong and a former minister in UPA govt
Rajdeep Sardesai of India Today (formerly CNN-IBN and NDTV before that) is married to Sagarika Ghose who is currently with ToI and ET Now (formerly CNN-IBN). Sagarika Ghose is the daughter of Bhaskar Ghose, who was appointed as Director General of Doordarshan by Cong govt. Bhaskar Ghose has been accused of doing financial favours to NDTV, his son in law's employer.
Vishnu Som of NDTV is the son of Himachal Som. Himachal Som was then made Indian ambassador to 'Italy' by Cong govt. Reba Som is the mother of Vishnu Som. She is an 'eminent intellectual'. She has written books about Nehru and Congress.
Vikram Chandra is an anchor and the CEO of NDTV. He has been accused of money laundering to the tune of 5500 Cr for P Chidambaram from the 2G scam loot.
Sitaram Yechuri is the current head of CPI(M). He is married to Seema Chishti. Seema Chishti is the resident editor of Indian Express , Delhi.
Sanjay Jha is the spokesperson of Cong and a frequent face on TV. Rajkamal Jha is his cousin. Rajkamal is the Managing Editor of Indian Express.
I hope now you realise why English language media paints Modi/BJP/RSS as a monster. Our media is wolf in sheep's clothes.

Paging Tracy to help understand the relationship web.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:33 am

seven wrote:Pronoy Roy (head of NDTV) is married to Radhika Roy. Radhika Roy is the sister of Brinda Karat of CPI(M). Brinda Karat is the wife of Prakash Karat , ex-head of CPI(M)
Barkha Dutt of NDTV is currently married to Haseeb Ahmed Drabu, who is a PDP politician from J&K
Nidhi Razdan of NDTV is live-in partner of Omar Abdullah, former CM of J&K
Sonia Singh of NDTV is married to RPN Singh of Cong and a former minister in UPA govt
Rajdeep Sardesai of India Today (formerly CNN-IBN and NDTV before that) is married to Sagarika Ghose who is currently with ToI and ET Now (formerly CNN-IBN). Sagarika Ghose is the daughter of Bhaskar Ghose, who was appointed as Director General of Doordarshan by Cong govt. Bhaskar Ghose has been accused of doing financial favours to NDTV, his son in law's employer.
Vishnu Som of NDTV is the son of Himachal Som. Himachal Som was then made Indian ambassador to 'Italy' by Cong govt. Reba Som is the mother of Vishnu Som. She is an 'eminent intellectual'. She has written books about Nehru and Congress.
Vikram Chandra is an anchor and the CEO of NDTV. He has been accused of money laundering to the tune of 5500 Cr for P Chidambaram from the 2G scam loot.
Sitaram Yechuri is the current head of CPI(M). He is married to Seema Chishti. Seema Chishti is the resident editor of Indian Express , Delhi.
Sanjay Jha is the spokesperson of Cong and a frequent face on TV. Rajkamal Jha is his cousin. Rajkamal is the Managing Editor of Indian Express.
I hope now you realise why English language media paints Modi/BJP/RSS as a monster. Our media is wolf in sheep's clothes.

Paging Tracy to help understand the relationship web.

The 1 billion non-English-media masses will believe what the media says and they dont have the intelligence to such relationship maze. The English media knows this very well - being eminent intellectuals.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Sun Feb 28, 2016 12:51 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
seven wrote:Pronoy Roy (head of NDTV) is married to Radhika Roy. Radhika Roy is the sister of Brinda Karat of CPI(M). Brinda Karat is the wife of Prakash Karat , ex-head of CPI(M)
Barkha Dutt of NDTV is currently married to Haseeb Ahmed Drabu, who is a PDP politician from J&K
Nidhi Razdan of NDTV is live-in partner of Omar Abdullah, former CM of J&K
Sonia Singh of NDTV is married to RPN Singh of Cong and a former minister in UPA govt
Rajdeep Sardesai of India Today (formerly CNN-IBN and NDTV before that) is married to Sagarika Ghose who is currently with ToI and ET Now (formerly CNN-IBN). Sagarika Ghose is the daughter of Bhaskar Ghose, who was appointed as Director General of Doordarshan by Cong govt. Bhaskar Ghose has been accused of doing financial favours to NDTV, his son in law's employer.
Vishnu Som of NDTV is the son of Himachal Som. Himachal Som was then made Indian ambassador to 'Italy' by Cong govt. Reba Som is the mother of Vishnu Som. She is an 'eminent intellectual'. She has written books about Nehru and Congress.
Vikram Chandra is an anchor and the CEO of NDTV. He has been accused of money laundering to the tune of 5500 Cr for P Chidambaram from the 2G scam loot.
Sitaram Yechuri is the current head of CPI(M). He is married to Seema Chishti. Seema Chishti is the resident editor of Indian Express , Delhi.
Sanjay Jha is the spokesperson of Cong and a frequent face on TV. Rajkamal Jha is his cousin. Rajkamal is the Managing Editor of Indian Express.
I hope now you realise why English language media paints Modi/BJP/RSS as a monster. Our media is wolf in sheep's clothes.

Paging Tracy to help understand the relationship web.

The 1 billion non-English-media masses will believe what the media says and they dont have the intelligence to such relationship maze. The English media knows this very well - being eminent intellectuals.

You can't generalize. CD is not one among the sheep. He is extremely close to YSR and Jagan. :-).

Burkha was very close to CONmen. This info came out during the Radia tape scandal. Burkha and Vir Singhvi were discredited at that time. She is now trying VERY hard to get Modi to talk to her. He won't oblige.

by Guest Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:08 pm

A better explanation:

An Eye opener B. Jeyamohan is one of the most influential contemporary, Tamil and Malayalam writer and literary critic from Nagercoil
This is the translation of his article: "Intolerance"
I learnt the meaning of “Power” when I visited Delhi in 1994 to receive my Sanskriti Samman award and stayed for two days in India International Centre. I did have some familiarities with Information and culture ministries. However, IIC is the place where “Power” is served on a gold plate.
IIC is located in a peaceful and luxurious bungalow with lawns, high class food and drinks, quietly moving waiters, the butter English spoken without the upper lip moving, lipsticked women gracefully adjusting their hair, the elegant welcome given to the inner circle members with signs and hugs without making any noise!
I have stayed in many star hotels later. But I have never seen anywhere the luxury and comfort of IIC.
IIC was established and funded by the Indian government as an independent body to promote arts and free thinking. If my memory serves me right, Dr. Karan Singh was also its head. I saw him in that evening.
I saw every intellectual that I had known through my reading of English language magazines. U R Ananthamurthy was staying there for almost four years almost as a permanent fixture. Girish Karnad was staying for a few days. Writers, journalists and thinkers such as Pritish Nandi, Makarant Parajpe, Shobha De were seen everywhere in the Centre.
It was true that I was overwhelmed that day. Arunmozhi (my wife) ran to Girish Karnad on spotting him and was thrilled to introduce herself to him. I was told that Nayantara Sehgal used to come there on daily basis to have a drink. I saw her that day too. I realized that the two other individuals who were given the award along with me, Rajdeep Sardesai and Anamika Haksar were regulars there.
They wear rough Kolkata kurtas and Kolhapuri chappals. Wear small glasses. Women in pure white hair and khadi saris. One of them, they said, was Kapila Vatsyayan. They said, Pupul Jayakar will also come. Wherever you turn, there were literary talks and art discussions.
That pomp kind of unnerved me. The ultra high intellectualism seen there somewhat alienated me. Venkat Swaminathan, who saw me the next day, immediately recognised my sense of discomfort. He said, "Hey, three fourth of this crowd is just a perfect horde of crows (the Tamil equivalent of psychophants). The snobs that make their living are draw their power by licking the boots of power centres. Most of them are mere power brokers. At best you may find one or two artists who you will really respect. And they can't bear this atmosphere for too long and will just run away.
But these are the people who decide what is culture for this country. They can talk about every thing in the world for one hour in colourful English with the right number of jargons. But on the 61st minute, the colour will start fading. Actually they don't know any thing in the real sense. Almost all are like the little boxes we find in attics which held hing a long time back", said Venkat Swaminathan.
Everyone will have four or five trusts in the name of Service Organizations or Cultural Organizations. They will be flying from one conference to the other. Once given accommodation in a government bungalow, they can never be removed from there. In Delhi alone this crowd has illegally occupied about 5,000 bungalows. There is another Power Centre similar to this in Delhi which is called the JNU. It is the same story there too.
Can't the government get rid of them?", I asked. He said, "normally governments do not think in that line. Because this crowd has stuck itself from the time of Nehru. They support each other. Even if some IAS officials try, they will fall at the right feet and escape".
"There is one more thing added to it" said Venkat Swaminathan. "Not only were these people just parasites, they also derive great power by showing themselves as progressive leftists. Did you notice it?". I said "Yes" with an amazement.
They are known throughout the world through the numerous seminars they attend. They are highly networked. Journalists around the world seek their opinion on whatever happens in India. They are the people who gave a leftist mask to the Congress Government. If you look at it that way, the amount spent on them is quite low”, he said. They are the trolls sitting on the head of India and nobody can do anything to them. They decide what is art or culture or thought of India.
I have often been to IIC with my Malayalam journalist friends. For them, this is the place to pick rumours and convert them in to news. They know there are no secrets as the day wears out and the spirits rise higher and higher in the head.
But I can only pity those people who engage in to political debates based on the supposedly rare gems of wisdoms dished out by these “intellectuals” through the middle pages of English newspapers. These intellectuals never actually know the real politics. They just shout on the basis of the superfluous knowledge and stand points, with the prime space enable by the network. That’s all.
Long time back when I wrote about this Circle, I had mentioned that Barkha Dutt is none but a power broker, my own friends fought with me for degrading a “progressive fighter”. Fortunately for me, within a few days, the brokering she did with Tata leaked out through the Nira Radia tapes. (Incidentally, what happened to that case, does any body know?). But even those stark revelations could not bring down Barkha Dutt from her exalted pedestal even for a month. That is the kind of power they have.
But now, for the first time in the history of independent India someone has dared to touch this power circle. Warnings were circulated at the lower level for the last about 6 months. Last week the Culture Ministry decided to send a notice to them. This, perhaps, is the reason for these intellectuals to suddenly flare up against “intolerance”.
For example, painter Jatin Das, father of actress Nandita Das is occupying a large government bungalow at one of the premium locations in Delhi free of cost for many years. Government has sent an eviction notice to him. This is the real reason for Nandita Das strongly speaking about intolerance in television channels and writing in English newspapers (all diligently carried by the network).
Even for a man as strong Modi, I think he has touched a wrong nerve. These elements are too powerful. They can destroy India through the media worldwide. They can create a picture that rivers of blood are flowing in India. They can make businessmen around the world to halt. They can wreck the tourism industry. The truth is there is no other power centre like this in India. Tolerating them is unavoidable for India. And Modi’s intolerance of them is extremely dangerous – not only for him but for the country itself.

by Guest Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:27 pm

I posted it from my iphone. I hope the font isn't messed up.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:40 pm

Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:50 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So, is he saying, Sikularism zindabad?

by Guest Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:52 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

Understandable. At that age, it's tough to get out of years of brainwashing. Thanks to the multimedia and the internet, people are better informed now and better exposed, unlike the time prior to mid 90s, when there was no internet or the social media.

At the time, whatever was written in The Hindu or India Today was the truth and whatever DD blurted out was the gospel

by Hellsangel Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:53 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

Tambrahms in India in general, are big Modi supporters.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:55 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.
So, is he saying, Sikularism zindabad?

no he is saying modi's promises are worthless and nothing is happening. this person who retired a few years ago as the president of a prominent TN industrial business house and knows the pulse of indian business leaders intimately thinks modi is full of bovine excremence.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:56 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.
Tambrahms in India in general, are big Modi supporters.

I am well aware of that.

by Hellsangel Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:08 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.
Tambrahms in India in general, are big Modi supporters.

I am well aware of that.

Perhaps they're harboring pipe dreams of a non DK party in power in TN.

by southindian Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:09 pm

A retired man who doesn't go out cannot see any change. Does he uses internet in India.

Max, you are almost there or are in that same age group.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:24 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman

by Guest Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:08 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman

You are not a libby if you are not anti-majority religion (anti-hindu, anti-christian, but pro-islam, to the extent of supporting the terrorists) everywhere in the world, except in muslim majority countries (they won't dare to even whimper there). So yeah, they'd support Sonia even if she's anti-national. If anything, they'd change the meaning of anti-national, but still would support the anti-majority religion ones.

by confuzzled dude Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:30 pm

Kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman
You are not a libby if you are not anti-majority religion (anti-hindu, anti-christian, but pro-islam, to the extent of supporting the terrorists) everywhere in the world, except in muslim majority countries (they won't dare to even whimper there). So yeah, they'd support Sonia even if she's anti-national. If anything, they'd change the meaning of anti-national, but still would support the anti-majority religion ones.

What about the ones that live very comfortably in a majority christian country enjoying all the minority rights and constitutional protections offered to them & at the same time fervently support killings of minority christians perpetrated by an anti-christian party, what are they called?

by Guest Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:15 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman
You are not a libby if you are not anti-majority religion (anti-hindu, anti-christian, but pro-islam, to the extent of supporting the terrorists) everywhere in the world, except in muslim majority countries (they won't dare to even whimper there). So yeah, they'd support Sonia even if she's anti-national. If anything, they'd change the meaning of anti-national, but still would support the anti-majority religion ones.
What about the ones that live very comfortably in a majority christian country enjoying all the minority rights and constitutional protections offered to them & at the same time fervently support killings of minority christians perpetrated by an anti-christian party, what are they called?

Yeah, all the brutal executions of the christian minorities by the muslims in the African countries. I commented to one post in FB on how the media in the west gives so much coverage to the terror attacks in France, Australia and elsewhere in the western world, but is callous to the brutality that happens in Africa and because of the minimal coverage, it doesn't hit us as much either. We talked about it a bit at work. I don't remember participating in any threads relating to that here. But, that doesn't mean I 'fervently support' (hello? hello?) the killings of the christians. How much did you condemn that?

by MaxEntropy_Man Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:35 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.
Tambrahms in India in general, are big Modi supporters.

I am well aware of that.
Perhaps they're harboring pipe dreams of a non DK party in power in TN.

Lol! Yeah that'll happen.

by Marathadi-Saamiyaar Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:02 pm

confuzzled dude wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman
You are not a libby if you are not anti-majority religion (anti-hindu, anti-christian, but pro-islam, to the extent of supporting the terrorists) everywhere in the world, except in muslim majority countries (they won't dare to even whimper there). So yeah, they'd support Sonia even if she's anti-national. If anything, they'd change the meaning of anti-national, but still would support the anti-majority religion ones.
What about the ones that live very comfortably in a majority christian country enjoying all the minority rights and constitutional protections offered to them & at the same time fervently support killings of minority christians perpetrated by an anti-christian party, what are they called?

Exactly.... be bold and state the group - M U S L I M S. They live in US, practice their brand of Burqa iSlam and dont think twice about shooting people (San Bernardino) or bomb everywhere - even when they are given refuge.

Well said - CD finally...

by Hellsangel Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:08 pm

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
confuzzled dude wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Finally found that one elusive elderly relative on this India trip who shares my view of Modi as a communal conman.

So you have TWO people:

Modi - a a pro-hindu, communal conman.

Sonia - an anti-national, anti hindu CONwoman

who do we chose?

you chose CONwoman and i chose the conman
You are not a libby if you are not anti-majority religion (anti-hindu, anti-christian, but pro-islam, to the extent of supporting the terrorists) everywhere in the world, except in muslim majority countries (they won't dare to even whimper there). So yeah, they'd support Sonia even if she's anti-national. If anything, they'd change the meaning of anti-national, but still would support the anti-majority religion ones.
What about the ones that live very comfortably in a majority christian country enjoying all the minority rights and constitutional protections offered to them & at the same time fervently support killings of minority christians perpetrated by an anti-christian party, what are they called?

Exactly.... be bold and state the group - M U S L I M S. They live in US, practice their brand of Burqa iSlam and dont think twice about shooting people (San Bernardino) or bomb everywhere - even when they are given refuge.

Well said - CD finally...

93 WTC terrorists - lived in the US

9/11 terrorists - lived in the US.

Fort Hood terrorist - lived in the US

San Bernardino terrorist couple - lived in the US.

....

by Sponsored content

Why media hates Modi

Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi

Re: Why media hates Modi