The SENILE ONE repeatedly disclosed CHARVAKA's name and employer name on this forum

[Guest]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

[Guest]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

have you been clicking on your thread repeatedly to increase the number of views?

[swapna]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

[Propagandhi711]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

[swapna]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

[garam_kuta]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

mbwahahaha... சாத்தான் வேதம் ஓதுகிறது!

[MaxEntropy_Man]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

[garam_kuta]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

"..which to park"  - next time onward, try using auto correction

tut..tut..tut..always failing in propositions

[Guest]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

Having trouble understanding you. So answer again.

1) was swapna right in posting charvaka' name and employer name?

2) was he right in doing that repeatedly?

3) and after that can he still claim to be ethical and of high morals?

[MaxEntropy_Man]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

Having trouble understanding you. So answer again.

1) was swapna right in posting charvaka' name and employer name?

2) was he right in doing that repeatedly?

3) and after that can he still claim to be ethical and of high morals?  

I wasn't replying to you but to Swapna.

[Marathadi-Saamiyaar]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

Really ? Who appointed you agents of the employers ?

Ethics is not dependent on convenience. YOu are preaching convenience of Ethics that you declined personal info of HA and hence you are osme kind of Ethics Raja. maintaining ethics when you are not in agreement and not convenient is more important.

[Guest]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

Really ?  Who appointed you agents of the employers ?

Ethics is not dependent on convenience.  YOu are preaching convenience of Ethics that you declined personal info of HA and hence you are osme kind of Ethics Raja. maintaining ethics when you are not in agreement and not convenient is more important.

minor correction. he didn't decline anything. you can only decline things that are offered to you. that whole claim is a lie. I talked to him about HA. I didn't offer any details regarding his identity.

besides, his real character shows in they way he told his false story. added a part of my showing pics before offering that info. pics that i clicked and shared months later, that too coz he happened to log in when i was done showing to others and shared with him too on an impulse.

[Guest]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

he had made it very clear that he will not moderate this forum. and he had made it very clear, that he will delete any post if the person making it, or the person affected, sent him a note to delete it. what did you do? you posted his name and employer info because someone else had posted yours. after a point in time, if i remember correctly, you began doing it routinely, whether someone posted your info or not.

[swapna]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

Having trouble understanding you. So answer again.

1) was swapna right in posting charvaka' name and employer name?

** YES, because charvakan's employer was his accomplice in slander, and his privacy-violating behaviour, inadvertent though their participation may have been. it was the employer's time and equipment that were being used as resourcs to perform those deeds; it was their job to stop him, and they did.

2) was he right in doing that repeatedly?

** YES, so long as charvakan did it repeatedly. it was more than fair to charvakan, because, as the admin, he had the advantage of owning the keys and passwords to the site, and the unearned freedom to make up rules to suit him and his tribal bros.

3) and after that can he still claim to be ethical and of high morals?

** YES, because it was a response to charvakan's unethical behaviour. 

** see my responses above.

[Marathadi-Saamiyaar]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

Having trouble understanding you. So answer again.

1) was swapna right in posting charvaka' name and employer name?

** YES, because charvakan's employer was his accomplice in slander, and his privacy-violating behaviour, inadvertent though their participation may have been. it was the employer's time and equipment that were being used as resourcs to perform those deeds; it was their job to stop him, and they did.

2) was he right in doing that repeatedly?

** YES, so long as charvakan did it repeatedly. it was more than fair to charvakan, because, as the admin, he had the advantage of owning the keys and passwords to the site, and the unearned freedom to make up rules to suit him and his tribal bros.

3) and after that can he still claim to be ethical and of high morals?

** YES, because it was a response to charvakan's unethical behaviour. 

** see my responses above.

ok...GestapO Chief of SuCH:

Tell us who are all the ones NOT using the "so-called" employer's time?

[swapna]

while charvaka repeatedly asked him not to do so.

so much for the INTEGRITY of the SENILE one.

charvakan fully deserved that treatment; he stole large amounts of his company's time and used its equipment to slander and harass members of this forum, which he himself had set up, reserving to himself the ability to erase slanderous posts; and enabling telega peepals, women, and his friends to engage in unethical behaviour towards those he disliked.

he seems to have believed that women are goddesses, and that he was their sole protector.

where is he now? did his company put a stop to his unethical behaviour? if so, they did the right thing.

don't you also harass, stalk, and slander people here, stealing hours of your company's time each day?

that's the only thing you can hang onto when you call someone ethical? that you arent employed and rest are? pretty flimsy and self serving. he and I had several disagreements and I find his naive liberalism irritating but he's the most ethical person I've seen so far.

anyway, hope you jump into a grease fire soon

routinely stealing large chunks of time from one's employer to slander others, threatening or attempting to reveal the private information of members, and not deleting posts that the administrator saw and knew were intended to expose private information are indeed important reasons to believe that charvakan, Our Darlin' Meghu, and "tyre-level" seetharamayya are/ were pathologically unethical creatures.

where are charvakan and huzefa "lotawallah" chaprasi now? are they living their lives "on their own terms?"

the hope you express in your last sentence above is as futile as your finding a warm, moist, and hairless place in which park your multiple foot-longs.

he had made it very clear that he will not moderate this forum.

## so bloody what? making his own, arbitrary rule clear or even, omg, very clear doesn't make it reasonable. if one starts a forum, one should moderate it fairly, or appoint a committe to do so.

and he had made it very clear, that he will delete any post if the person making it, or the person affected, sent him a note to delete it. what did you do?

## I tightened the vise around his testicles, because he had seen the enormously offensive posts, and referred to them in conversations with his cronies, yet done nothing about them. some people who have done nothing unfair will not "request" an offender in triplicate to remedy the offence.

you posted his name and employer info because someone else had posted yours.

## they were his friends. I first posted only the three initials of his employer, as a warning shot. I was fair, indeed patient and generous. he didn't take the hint. it was fair because charvakan had made his employer an accomplice. he was using their resources to abuse the members of this forum.

after a point in time, if i remember correctly, you began doing it routinely, whether someone posted your info or not.

## I don't think I ever did it except as a response. but there were posts mentioning the names of people who were supposedly close to me, who are/ were unconnected in any way with this forum.

## and where's a rule that requires me to wait until his friends violate my privacy? charvakan was given numerous chances to reform his administration of the forum.

## something to remember: arbitrary rules and arbitrary application of such rules may elicit responses in kind.

## mrs mathur, please see ## above for my response.

[garam_kuta]

repetition doesn't make something inherently false, true. there are and have been lots of unsavory characters here. charvaka is NOT one of them. he never harassed anyone. we all engage in sarcastic mocking of each other. he did nothing more than that. and those who were at the receiving end of that gave back as good as they got including swapna, seva, rashmun and others.

Having trouble understanding you. So answer again.

1) was swapna right in posting charvaka' name and employer name?

** YES, because charvakan's employer was his accomplice in slander, and his privacy-violating behaviour, inadvertent though their participation may have been. it was the employer's time and equipment that were being used as resourcs to perform those deeds; it was their job to stop him, and they did.

2) was he right in doing that repeatedly?

** YES, so long as charvakan did it repeatedly. it was more than fair to charvakan, because, as the admin, he had the advantage of owning the keys and passwords to the site, and the unearned freedom to make up rules to suit him and his tribal bros.

3) and after that can he still claim to be ethical and of high morals?

** YES, because it was a response to charvakan's unethical behaviour. 

** see my responses above.

that's all history and, now, a more relevant question to the present situation: do you think it's morally right and ethically correct if some of the SUCH folks apprise of your vulgarity, hatred, veiled threats etc., to the charvaka episode's equivalent and relevant people that are connected to you? - just to expedite help, shall we say.

[goodcitizn]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

[southindian]

LOL! Nice

Well... Thomas NEVER had balls... and can only pull others down from behind random handles. Shows his lack of confidence.

[garam_kuta]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

[smArtha]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

[garam_kuta]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

in this case, butt is what FF has as an excuse for a head, and hence it is a tautology alright

but, for us, butt means butt, and there's no question - yes, with us, butthead would be an oxymoron, sir.

[smArtha]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

in this case, butt is what FF has as an excuse for a head, and hence it is a tautology alright

but, for us, butt means butt, and there's no question - yes, with us, butthead would be an oxymoron, sir.

LOL .

[southindian]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

in this case, butt is what FF has as an excuse for a head, and hence it is a tautology alright

but, for us, butt means butt, and there's no question - yes, with us, butthead would be an oxymoron, sir.

LOL

[goodcitizn]

A SUCH man of the thesaurus
Tried to screw a rhinoceros
The beast, alas,
Horned his ass
An episode sad and disastrous

[goodcitizn]

When asked if it was indeed true
Of the sexual prowess of Mburuburu
Replied Nurse Raniammai
Releasing a heavy sigh
"A Peeping Tom would heckle and boo"

[Propagandhi711]

When asked if it was indeed true
Of the sexual prowess of Mburuburu
Replied Nurse Raniammai
Releasing a heavy sigh
"A Peeping Tom would heckle and boo"

haha...you mean he's like an egg, two minutes of weak pounding with his 2 incher and he's done?

[goodcitizn]

When asked if it was indeed true
Of the sexual prowess of Mburuburu
Replied Nurse Raniammai
Releasing a heavy sigh
"A Peeping Tom would heckle and boo"

haha...you mean he's like an egg, two minutes of weak pounding with his 2 incher and he's done?

The Masai warrior goes by the atlas scale: 1 inch = 1 mile

[goodcitizn]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

in this case, butt is what FF has as an excuse for a head, and hence it is a tautology alright

but, for us, butt means butt, and there's no question - yes, with us, butthead would be an oxymoron, sir.

Butthead is an oxymoron; a dumb blonde, a foxymoron.

[garam_kuta]

There once was a man Flimflam
Who butted heads with a ram
His wiener in the collision
Went out of commission
Thus he became Swapna Ma'm

ah..that's some tautology there

butthead is a tautology or oxymoron?!

in this case, butt is what FF has as an excuse for a head, and hence it is a tautology alright

but, for us, butt means butt, and there's no question - yes, with us, butthead would be an oxymoron, sir.

Butthead is an oxymoron; a dumb blonde, a foxymoron.

is foxymoron an oxymoron?

[Sponsored content]