finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
http://www.salemnews.com/news/local_news/moulton-moments-of-silence-not-enough-to-stop-gun-violence/article_84bd50bb-4c5f-532b-ba1b-ef6c351f4c41.html
yeah he is a libby and a marine who served in iraq and received a commendation medal from the military for valor.
yeah he is a libby and a marine who served in iraq and received a commendation medal from the military for valor.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
a comment from elsewhere:
The only thing that stops a bad man with a gun is a legislator with a spine. Too bad they are in such short supply.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
If the Democrats want, they could man up and try to amend or repeal the 2nd amendment, but oh wait....
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Hellsangel wrote:If the Democrats want, they could man up and try to amend or repeal the 2nd amendment, but oh wait....
this is a canard. find me one credible democrat who even wants to amend or repeal the second. which democrat has said that? you know that's not what i am talking about here, and yet you and your ilk continue to spread misinformation and lies.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Hellsangel wrote:Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it. Hey they went to war for the 13th Amendment. What is stopping them with the 2nd?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
Last edited by Hellsangel on Wed Jun 15, 2016 10:37 am; edited 1 time in total
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Hellsangel wrote:Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
nope. nada. not a one. so you and the NRA can stop raising the bogeyman of a repeal or amendment and stop scaring the already terrified rethuglican masses.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Then they have no spine I guess, considering that people were willing to go to war for the 13th.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
nope. nada. not a one. so you and the NRA can stop raising the bogeyman of a repeal or amendment and stop scaring the already terrified rethuglican masses.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
Hellsangel wrote:Then they have no spine I guess, considering that people were willing to go to war for the 13th.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:
Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
nope. nada. not a one. so you and the NRA can stop raising the bogeyman of a repeal or amendment and stop scaring the already terrified rethuglican masses.
or they truly don't want to. despite my own opinions, i recognized long ago that support for guns spans political divides. it is too culturally deep-seated. i accept i am a relative newcomer to this society and can't possibly understand what drives this at a gut level for the majority of americans. what we are arguing about here is bringing some sanity about reasonable restrictions, not amendment or repeal. the bogeyman of the dems wanting to repeal the second is a rethuglican/NRA canard. nothing more.
MaxEntropy_Man- Posts : 14702
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?MaxEntropy_Man wrote:by the way, let's discuss the second -- what is the meaning of the word "regulate" in the second?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
nope. nada. not a one. so you and the NRA can stop raising the bogeyman of a repeal or amendment and stop scaring the already terrified rethuglican masses.
Actually...whats wrong in repealing the 2nd ? It is so outdated and obsolete and the country was afraid of the Bristish Govt and its soldiers. The US did not even have a regular army or law enforcement mechanism. It was basically each person unto himself and hence the need for such an amendment.
No need now.
Repeal it.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: finally a congressman from MA who's angered by empty rhetoric and moments of silence
The main worry is about the presidential system. Dubya ruled the country under a quasi perpetual emergency. Regan used a lot of executive orders......Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:Sure. Look for one. I'm sure you'll find many chomping at the bit to do it.MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Hellsangel wrote:
Nice try. Here is a question for you, Il Professore. What did well-regulated mean in 1776?
we'll get to that but first, how about answering my earlier question of finding me a democrat who wants to amend or repeal the second.
nope. nada. not a one. so you and the NRA can stop raising the bogeyman of a repeal or amendment and stop scaring the already terrified rethuglican masses.
Actually...whats wrong in repealing the 2nd ? It is so outdated and obsolete and the country was afraid of the Bristish Govt and its soldiers. The US did not even have a regular army or law enforcement mechanism. It was basically each person unto himself and hence the need for such an amendment.
No need now.
Repeal it.
So, when times are rough and the president wants to get his way, he can run the country through presidential orders. Even Lincoln used them! So, the ultra right-wing guys want some protection from presidential abuses.
That said, with some tweaking of the presidential executive orders through some amendments, they can now repeal the 2nd and make people feel safe. Trudeau declared "emergency" when some French-speaking Canadians murdered a diplomat so that the security forces could get extraordinary powers. But he could not continue with it beyond a specified time. Indira Gandui also couldn't continue with her CONish dickTatership. Perhaps, the US can learn a thing or two from the British parliamentary system.
Vakavaka Pakapaka- Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24
Similar topics
» Mr. Modi’s declaration of change and a new future for India an empty rhetoric and pretence?
» Modi gets an award for his rhetoric.....
» Stupid Cricket rhetoric
» Irresponsible rhetoric kills
» contrast this with the rhetoric on this board after the delhi rape
» Modi gets an award for his rhetoric.....
» Stupid Cricket rhetoric
» Irresponsible rhetoric kills
» contrast this with the rhetoric on this board after the delhi rape
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum