Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

by Hellsangel Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:43 pm

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

by goodcitizn Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:38 am

I didn't read the content. Anything explosive here?

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:45 am

They are interesting. Check this out:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=Pakistan+%7C+India&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

And here is an example from Huma Abedin:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3561

More info here:

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-06-12/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to-release-more-private-emails-sent-by-hillary-clinton/ wrote:Mr Assange said Wikileaks has accumulated a large cache of information about the Democratic presidential nominee that could be used to bring an indictment against her.
"Loretta Lynch [the attorney general]...is not going to indict Hillary Clinton," he conceded.
"It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:55 am

Wow that's classified and explosive as hell!!! Especially because it says Reuters in big bold letters at the top. Abedin passed on a Reuters news story to Hillary on a private email network. That's it! This is the big reveal we were all waiting for. Thanks for posting. I'm going to drown my sorrows at Hillary's bad judgment in drink. Sniff :-(

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:58 am

And I knew Il Professore with a hard on for Shrilley would react Smile

Huma Abedin seems to have an enormous amount of influence on her. There is a story about how she was in tears when Shrillery lugged her own bags and she couldn't do it for her. Seems like Shrillery has some very devoted servants.

by goodcitizn Wed Jun 15, 2016 12:07 pm

Hellsangel wrote:They are interesting. Check this out:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=Pakistan+%7C+India&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

And here is an example from Huma Abedin:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3561

More info here:

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-06-12/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to-release-more-private-emails-sent-by-hillary-clinton/ wrote:Mr Assange said Wikileaks has accumulated a large cache of information about the Democratic presidential nominee that could be used to bring an indictment against her.
"Loretta Lynch [the attorney general]...is not going to indict Hillary Clinton," he conceded.
"It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."

I went through about ten of the emails; very yawn-inducing. Hillary spelled Namiste. Other stuff, boring. Too laborious to identify anything suggesting breach of national security.

I'd rather listen to Sadhguru's inanity for twenty minutes.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Jun 15, 2016 12:27 pm

goodcitizn wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:They are interesting. Check this out:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=Pakistan+%7C+India&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

And here is an example from Huma Abedin:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3561

More info here:

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-06-12/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to-release-more-private-emails-sent-by-hillary-clinton/ wrote:Mr Assange said Wikileaks has accumulated a large cache of information about the Democratic presidential nominee that could be used to bring an indictment against her.
"Loretta Lynch [the attorney general]...is not going to indict Hillary Clinton," he conceded.
"It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."
I went through about ten of the emails; very yawn-inducing. Hillary spelled Namiste. Other stuff, boring. Too laborious to identify anything suggesting breach of national security.

I'd rather listen to Sadhguru's inanity for twenty minutes.

you can be sure if there was anything "explosive" there, the newspapers and the breitbarters would have got to it well before our bob woodward here. should thank him for posting a link here. very soporific for those days when i've had too much coffee and can't get to sleep.

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 12:43 pm

Of course these are innocuous. The State Department cleared these for release.

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:00 pm

But watching Il Professore react is priceless.

by Seva Lamberdar Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:03 pm

Hellsangel wrote:They are interesting. Check this out:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=Pakistan+%7C+India&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

And here is an example from Huma Abedin:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3561

More info here:

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-06-12/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to-release-more-private-emails-sent-by-hillary-clinton/ wrote:Mr Assange said Wikileaks has accumulated a large cache of information about the Democratic presidential nominee that could be used to bring an indictment against her.
"Loretta Lynch [the attorney general]...is not going to indict Hillary Clinton," he conceded.
"It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."

these emails look like the news forwards (from newspapers and magazines) between colleagues and bosses -- is that the recent debate / controversy about missing emails?

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:07 pm

Seva Lamberdar wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:They are interesting. Check this out:
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=Pakistan+%7C+India&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult

And here is an example from Huma Abedin:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3561

More info here:

http://www.itv.com/news/2016-06-12/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to-release-more-private-emails-sent-by-hillary-clinton/ wrote:Mr Assange said Wikileaks has accumulated a large cache of information about the Democratic presidential nominee that could be used to bring an indictment against her.
"Loretta Lynch [the attorney general]...is not going to indict Hillary Clinton," he conceded.
"It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."
these emails look like the news forwards (from newspapers and magazines) between colleagues and bosses -- is that the recent debate / controversy about missing emails?

Sevaji, these are the emails that the State Department has approved for release to the public.

by Hellsangel Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:15 pm

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/russia-reportedly-set-release-clintons-193700629.html

by silvermani Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:56 pm

Hellsangel wrote:http://finance.yahoo.com/news/russia-reportedly-set-release-clintons-193700629.html

Why release them now when they can hold on to them and blackmail her after she becomes President?

by Sponsored content

Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world

Re: Shrillery's emails from her private server exposed to the world