Hello Republicans of SUCH!

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:38 am

How has your weekend been so far - Silverbell, Hellsu et al? Are you looking forward to the next debate?

Haha this is like shooting fish in a barrel.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:41 am

There is only one q -- when and in what forum will Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnel, and John McCain publicly and affirmatively repudiate the GOP candidate for president.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:05 am

Bill apparently has advised Hillary that poor countries should be kept away from being influenced by India and China. So, Hillary may end up being anti-India in her foreign policy. Obama refused to label PakiSatan as a terror sponsoring state. So, overall, under democrats, the foreign policy will continue along the same line as far as PakiSatan is concerned.

I don't want to vote for Trump but I don't know if I should vote for Hillary. I may end up wasting my vote if I go for the greens or the libertarians. Hmm......

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:05 am

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Bill apparently has advised Hillary that poor countries should be kept away from being influenced by India and China. So, Hillary may end up being anti-India in her foreign policy. Obama refused to label PakiSatan as a terror sponsoring state. So, overall, under democrats, the foreign policy will continue along the same line as far as PakiSatan is concerned.

I don't want to vote for Trump but I don't know if I should vote for Hillary. I may end up wasting my vote if I go for the greens or the libertarians. Hmm......

Same dilemma here. Such horrible candidates we have this time. So frustrating!

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:12 am

Same here. Yes horrible candidates. I just saw a video of HRC saying she just grabs the balls of men she finds attractive. So horrible! No respect! Equally bad, so sad.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:21 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Same here. Yes horrible candidates. I just saw a video of HRC saying she just grabs the balls of men she finds attractive. So horrible! No respect! Equally bad, so sad.

The Clintons are no saints either. Billyboy actually did the acts, not just talk. He grabbed the boobs of women and wanted to get into their vags, but Mrs.Sati Savitri supported him and insulted the women who complained about him. Horrible!!

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:23 am

Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

by silvermani Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:03 am

LATimes did a similar "revelation" about Arnold when he was running for governor of CA. It didn't work. Is anything surprising about what Trump said? Whatever he said is inline with public opinion of him.
More concerning is the revelation that Hitlary is a two tongued paid agent batting on behalf of wall st bankers.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:07 am

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

by silvermani Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:17 am

Hitlary's sick sense of humor - defends a child rapist, and then laughs when talking about the case.

Q: Did Hillary Clinton volunteer in 1975 to defend a rapist, who was found not guilty, and laugh about it in an interview in 1980?
A: Clinton defended an accused rapist, but she did not volunteer. He pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. She laughed when recalling unusual aspects of the case.

Source: http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/

by silvermani Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:19 am

Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.

by Hellsangel Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:30 am

Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:35 am

silvermani wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.

Negatively spectacular! So is her email bungle up, which is pretty serious. She's doing everything she can to deflect the public from those issues by the negative campaigning she's doing against Trump.

by confuzzled dude Sat Oct 08, 2016 11:55 am

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:Bill apparently has advised Hillary that poor countries should be kept away from being influenced by India and China. So, Hillary may end up being anti-India in her foreign policy. Obama refused to label PakiSatan as a terror sponsoring state. So, overall, under democrats, the foreign policy will continue along the same line as far as PakiSatan is concerned.

I don't want to vote for Trump but I don't know if I should vote for Hillary. I may end up wasting my vote if I go for the greens or the libertarians. Hmm......

What about this?

As it turns out, not so much. Throughout 2007 and 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama declared, "we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights." Like President Bush and John McCain, Romney opposed unilateral American action to kill the Al Qaeda chieftain and his henchmen:
"I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours... I don't think those kinds of comments help in this effort to draw more friends to our effort..."There is a war being waged by terrorists of different types and nature across the world," Romney said. "We want, as a civilized world, to participate with other nations in this civilized effort to help those nations reject the extreme with them."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/21/1147216/-Mitt-Romney-s-foreign-policy-follies

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 12:26 pm

It's clear reading this thread that Drumpf knew his supporters very well. "I can stand in the middle of fifth avenue and shoot someone and still wouldn't matter", he said. Looking at his supporters on this forum, he was dead right.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 12:30 pm

Let me repeat. Billy C is not on the ticket. That aside, his dalliances were consensual and he was impeached for lying to congress. Nobody gave him a free ride for screwing up.

I am so glad that you guys are frank about not minding having a person with proclivities of violence towards women and zero impulse control (huge temperament problem for a person wishing to be president) as your leader.

HRC should refuse to share the debate stage with this asshole. She doesn't have to do this. He is doing a good enough job of hanging himself. Why bother saying anything!

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 12:35 pm

At this point, the presidential race doesn't concern me. Here is the vital question of this election -- will the revelation of this video provide the wimpy republican house and senate candidates who have been toeing the party line for fear of reprisals from the goobers supporting Drumpf, new pairs of testicles? Or will they still stand by their man? They have fresh calculations to make -- which is a more damaging and vote losing prospect -- dumping and urinating on him, or standing by him?

ETA: I will be meeting the two women I have mentioned before who are Drumpf supporters at a social gathering today. You can bet your ass I will be asking them the same question.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 12:42 pm

Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.

by Hellsangel Sat Oct 08, 2016 12:46 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.

You've had a hard-on for Shrillery for a while now. Let me not shatter your illusions, Il Professore.

by Vakavaka Pakapaka Sat Oct 08, 2016 1:55 pm

Republicans can still salvage this issue. They can ask someone in the party to contest as an independent candidate and campaign for him/her for the next one month. They can also pop up a name and ask voters to write that name on the ballot. They do count such votes. However, the best the Republicans can achieve through these is to stop Trump. Hillary will still win. At least the Republican party can be saved from further erosion.

I heard on the TV that some Republicans want to quickly nominate the vice-presidential candidate as their presidential candidate to consolidate the conservative vote. Clearly, there is a need to revive the Republican party..........

by confuzzled dude Sat Oct 08, 2016 2:01 pm

Maan Singh Khalsa was stopped at a red light in Richmond, Calif., when, authorities say, a group of white men in a pickup truck began to attack him, completely unprovoked.

One of the men threw a beer can at Khalsa’s car while cursing and yelling at him. At the next red light, Khalsa’s head was pulled out of the window of his car, his turban was forcibly removed and his long hair was cut off, authorities say.

The Sikh Coalition, a national civil rights organization, is urging California law enforcement officials to file hate crime charges in connection with the September attack that left Khalsa with several injuries. The group argues that Khalsa, an information technology specialist and part-time caregiver, was targeted because of his ethnicity and religion.

Khalsa, who is of South Asian descent, wears a turban and keeps his hair long for religious purposes.

“The attackers caused physical injuries and deep harm when they targeted my Sikh faith,” Khalsa said in a statement. “I urge a thorough investigation so we can address the tide of violence and bigotry in this country.”

The organization wrote a letter on Friday to Richmond Police Chief Allwyn Brown and Contra Costa County District Attorney Mark A. Peterson, urging them to investigate the incident as a hate crime.

[‘Terrorist, go back to your country,’ attacker yelled in assault of Sikh man]

The attack happened about 9 p.m. on Sept. 25, when Khalsa was driving home from work. A white Ford F-150 truck, with about five to six men, who yelled at cursed at Khalsa, pulled up next to him at an intersection in Richmond, about 20 miles outside of San Francisco.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/10/08/a-sikh-man-was-brutally-attacked-by-a-group-who-removed-his-turban-cut-off-his-hair/?hpid=hp_no-name_hp-in-the-news%3Apage%2Fin-the-news

Hmmm.. This took place, of all the places, in California.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:26 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.
You've had a hard-on for Shrillery for a while now. Let me not shatter your illusions, Il Professore.

I have no problems voting for her. The only hypothetical candidate I like better than her is Elizabeth Warren. I'm not conflicted about my vote. Let's see you say the same thing about the pussy grabber.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:48 pm

If I were a republican, I would pause on the spirited and vocal support for a moment. The way and the timing with which things are coming out for the past few weeks, seems like there are more bombs waiting to explode for Trump. Things are coming out for Clinton too, but not the kind that will turn off the christian american.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 5:24 pm

Scarlet O'Hara wrote:If I were a republican, I would pause on the spirited and vocal support for a moment. The way and the timing with which things are coming out for the past few weeks, seems like there are more bombs waiting to explode for Trump. Things are coming out for Clinton too, but not the kind that will turn off the christian american.

Christian Americans don't seem particularly Christisn this election cycle.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 5:39 pm

Old man McCain still has a pair. Good for him.

by silvermani Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:07 pm

Scott Adams:

Trump wasn’t running for Pope. He never claimed moral authority. His proposition has been that he’s an asshole (essentially), but we need an asshole to fight ISIS, ignore lobbyists, and beat up Congress. Does it change anything to have confirmation that he is exactly what you thought he was?

by pravalika nanda Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:23 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Scarlet O'Hara wrote:If I were a republican, I would pause on the spirited and vocal support for a moment. The way and the timing with which things are coming out for the past few weeks, seems like there are more bombs waiting to explode for Trump. Things are coming out for Clinton too, but not the kind that will turn off the christian american.

Christian Americans don't seem particularly Christisn this election cycle.

really? this election is about how very christian and bigoted america is.

by pravalika nanda Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:24 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.
You've had a hard-on for Shrillery for a while now. Let me not shatter your illusions, Il Professore.

I have no problems voting for her. The only hypothetical candidate I like better than her is Elizabeth Warren. I'm not conflicted about my vote. Let's see you say the same thing about the pussy grabber.

oh you're using the same language as trump now?

by pravalika nanda Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:31 pm

silvermani wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.

what worries me the most is that hc will naturally under the circs became the president and we don't really know much about her policies cuz there haven't been any real debates: whats going to happen to healthcare - insurance, bundles, compensation/SS benefits/taxes/and of course foreign policy. she's not honest obviously, she'll play along with wallstreet. i'm really worried.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:44 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.
You've had a hard-on for Shrillery for a while now. Let me not shatter your illusions, Il Professore.

I have no problems voting for her. The only hypothetical candidate I like better than her is Elizabeth Warren. I'm not conflicted about my vote. Let's see you say the same thing about the pussy grabber.

That shows who the blind and the deluded one is.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:49 pm

pravalika nanda wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.
what worries me the most is that hc will naturally under the circs became the president and we don't really know much about her policies cuz there haven't been any real debates: whats going to happen to healthcare - insurance, bundles, compensation/SS benefits/taxes/and of course foreign policy. she's not honest obviously, she'll play along with wallstreet. i'm really worried.

That's what Hillary, democrats and her supporters are trying to do. Shift the focus from her dismal track record, her corruption and bungling up charges, her future policies, etc to all the negative canvassing about Trump. It's all been about Trump said this, trump said that, he is this, he is that, his supporters are all of this, etc day in and day out. Absolutely no talk about the policies.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:02 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Let me repeat. Billy C is not on the ticket. That aside, his dalliances were consensual and he was impeached for lying to congress. Nobody gave him a free ride for screwing up.

I am so glad that you guys are frank about not minding having a person with proclivities of violence towards women and zero impulse control (huge temperament problem for a person wishing to be president) as your leader.

HRC should refuse to share the debate stage with this asshole. She doesn't have to do this. He is doing a good enough job of hanging himself. Why bother saying anything!

To say that Billyboy is not on the ticket is not an escape route for you guys. Hillary supports such kind of man and he's going to be the future President's husband, if she wins.
Consensual? Except Lewinsky, no one else's was consensual. Who are you kidding? That guy is a sexual harasser/rapist. And your madam supports that kind of a guy.

Saying Lewinsky's was consensual may be legally right, but not morally. Just imagine this. An immature and low self-esteemed girl student of yours is infatuated to you and flashes her panties in private to you. Do you then go and do an oral on her and say, 'well, she asked for it. It was consensual.'? Sorry, i had to be crude to make you deluded one get the point. No sir, as her teacher, you are not supposed to do that to your student. That reflects on your character. The same applies to Bill Clinton. He was the sitting President of the country. He is not supposed to take advantage of a stupid young girl who was working as an intern at his office and justify it as consensual. He should've had better sense. That's poor character and Hillary supports such kind of a man.

by pravalika nanda Sat Oct 08, 2016 7:56 pm

Kinnera wrote:
pravalika nanda wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Bill Clinton is not on the ticket.

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.
what worries me the most is that hc will naturally under the circs became the president and we don't really know much about her policies cuz there haven't been any real debates: whats going to happen to healthcare - insurance, bundles, compensation/SS benefits/taxes/and of course foreign policy. she's not honest obviously, she'll play along with wallstreet. i'm really worried.
That's what Hillary, democrats and her supporters are trying to do. Shift the focus from her dismal track record, her corruption and bungling up charges, her future policies, etc to all the negative canvassing about Trump. It's all been about Trump said this, trump said that, he is this, he is that, his supporters are all of this, etc day in and day out. Absolutely no talk about the policies.

** well that's the media's fault. they have to stop focusing on this guys antics from 10 years ago and ask hillary where she stands on variuos things. they have to ask her all the thoughtful qs that the opposition failed to ask. HC will be very controlling and it will be easy with all the power she and bill accumulate to do whatever she wants and it will be tougher to question her after she becomes president. now is the only time she will be somehwat friendly and forthcoming.

by pravalika nanda Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:01 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.

** they make for late night comedy but won't change the course of the election. all these boys who're "distancing themselves from trump" and are shattered by these revelations are such losers. it tough coming to terms with the news that trump got 10,000x more action than they ever got.

by Guest Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:30 pm

pravalika nanda wrote:
Kinnera wrote:
pravalika nanda wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Kinnera wrote:

He'll be the first gentleman and will be shoved on to our faces. Don't you see the hypocrisy of the Clintons? Billary supports and stands by the man who is equally or more horrible than Trump while pointing fingers at trump. I am getting so sick of all the negative campaigning. She has nothing spectacular or impressive to talk about her past record nor anything convining and believable about her future plans for the country. She chose the right time about Trump's video now in order to deflect the wikileaks stuff about her. Nobody is a saint in this race. Now that we can't do anything, let's get past that and focus on the issues. As Vakavaka said, Hillary's foreign policy is scary, so is her doling out free stuff. No socialism pls! It doesn't work for the good of the country in the long run.

I disagree. The epic levels of corruption carried out under the guise of the Clinton foundation is nothing short of spectacular.
what worries me the most is that hc will naturally under the circs became the president and we don't really know much about her policies cuz there haven't been any real debates: whats going to happen to healthcare - insurance, bundles, compensation/SS benefits/taxes/and of course foreign policy. she's not honest obviously, she'll play along with wallstreet. i'm really worried.
That's what Hillary, democrats and her supporters are trying to do. Shift the focus from her dismal track record, her corruption and bungling up charges, her future policies, etc to all the negative canvassing about Trump. It's all been about Trump said this, trump said that, he is this, he is that, his supporters are all of this, etc day in and day out. Absolutely no talk about the policies.
** well that's the media's fault. they have to stop focusing on this guys antics from 10 years ago and ask hillary where she stands on variuos things. they have to ask her all the thoughtful qs that the opposition failed to ask. HC will be very controlling and it will be easy with all the power she and bill accumulate to do whatever she wants and it will be tougher to question her after she becomes president. now is the only time she will be somehwat friendly and forthcoming.

.

She's already a law/authority unto herself. The Clintons can do anything and get away from it.

Look at the way she suppressed everyone else in the democratic party and had her nominated as the Presidential candidate. She's going to be pretty autocratic if she becomes the President of this country. Pretty scary!
She wasn't giving any interviews to the press. Isolated herself from the press. Even if she opened up, i don't know how many of them have the guts or willingness to cross examine her left and right. We've seen how biased and soft the moderater was towards her during the first debate.

The next four years are not going to be good.

by truthbetold Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:32 pm

White evangelicals and Catholics are major support blocks of republicans. Those blocks claim to be deeply religious and consider Trump's extra marital affairs, lewd language and his disparaging comments about women (about allowing him the freedom to grope them because he is a star) very offensive.

How can republicans explain these comments?

Most of the office holders are slowly finding exit doors.

Blind trump supporters are repeating Trump words "Bill Clinton said and did worse than what I said."

" Hillary Clinton kills children in the womb. She lies about e mails. She is worse than Trump. " Said an evangelical pastor on Fox.

What more can trump do? May be we will see a tape of Trump or his adviser discussing with Putin on ways to subvert US Presidential election.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:57 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/08/politics/trump-on-howard-stern/index.html

by Guest Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:52 am

Story behind who leaked the tape.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/07/media/access-hollywood-donald-trump-tape/index.html

On Monday, according to an NBC source, one of the entertainment newsmagazine's producers remembered Trump's 2005 taping session with former "Access" co-host Billy Bush.

Trump's offensive comments about Alicia Machado were still making waves. And the Associated Press had just published a detailed story quoting former "Apprentice" employees saying Trump "was lewd and sexist" while taping the reality show.
With that in mind, a producer dug up the tape.
By mid-week, executive producer Rob Silverstein and his producing team had taken a look at its contents, and discovered that among other things it included a moment in which Trump told Bush, "And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."
It also included Trump saying he once tried and failed to have sex with Nancy O'Dell, who was Bush's co-host at the time.
After reviewing the tape, "we were debating what to do" with it, an NBC source explained.
By Friday morning, Silverstein had decided to broadcast it, and a script had been written. The story was not slated to air on Friday night's edition of the show, however.
That means the earliest it would have aired is Monday night -- after Sunday's presidential debate.
Another NBC source confirmed that "Access" was working on a story, and that NBC News knew about it, but said that as of Friday morning the story "wasn't quite finalized."
That's when Silverstein was notified that David Fahrenthold of The Washington Post had come into possession of a copy.

by silvermani Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:38 am

Kinnera wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:Stupid distraction from the leak of Shrillery's speeches.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37595047

If you think the email controversy or these wiki reveals are equal in magnitude to the Drumpf bus video, you know a lot less about politics than I thought you did.
You've had a hard-on for Shrillery for a while now. Let me not shatter your illusions, Il Professore.

I have no problems voting for her. The only hypothetical candidate I like better than her is Elizabeth Warren. I'm not conflicted about my vote. Let's see you say the same thing about the pussy grabber.
That shows who the blind and the deluded one is.

by MaxEntropy_Man Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:18 am

What kind of father would casually discuss his daughter's hypothetical breast implants and voluptuousness on radio and TV? And be ok with calling his daughter a piece of ass?

by Sponsored content