Coffeehouse for desis
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

2 posters

Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Guest Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:44 am

Uttar Pradesh continues to amaze the world.

https://thewire.in/116500/fossils-oldest-plant/

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Seva Lamberdar Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:38 pm

Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).
Seva Lamberdar
Seva Lamberdar

Posts : 6594
Join date : 2012-11-29

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bYp0igbxHcmg1G1J-qw0VUBSn7Fu

Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Guest Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:54 pm

Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Seva Lamberdar Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:09 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.
Chitrakoot originally (with the Ramayana connection / narration) referred to the mountainous / forest region where Valmiki's hermitage was located (in forest / mountain area), corresponding to the Vindhya (Vindhyachal) mountain range which lies mostly in the direction / side of MP.
Seva Lamberdar
Seva Lamberdar

Posts : 6594
Join date : 2012-11-29

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bYp0igbxHcmg1G1J-qw0VUBSn7Fu

Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Guest Fri Mar 17, 2017 3:13 pm

Seva Lamberdar wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.
Chitrakoot originally (with the Ramayana connection / narration) referred to the mountainous / forest region where Valmiki's hermitage was located (in forest / mountain area), corresponding to the Vindhya (Vindhyachal) mountain range which lies mostly in the direction / side of MP.

The town of Vindhyachal is in UP. Kamadgiri Hill is also in UP. Sita ki Rasoi and Hanuman Dhara are also in UP. And Tulsidas was also from UP (the plaque commemorating Tulsidas is in the UP side of Chitrakoot). It is clear that UP has a more direct association with Ramayana than MP.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Vakavaka Pakapaka Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:32 pm

Seva Lamberdar wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.
Chitrakoot originally (with the Ramayana connection / narration) referred to the mountainous / forest region where Valmiki's hermitage was located (in forest / mountain area), corresponding to the Vindhya (Vindhyachal) mountain range which lies mostly in the direction / side of MP.
It is possible that they lived on the MP side of Chitrakoot and relieved themselves on the UP side of Chitrakoot. That explains why bhaiyyas are still bimaru. Vindhyachal on the UP side is now called Mirzapur because of monomaniac infestation.

Vakavaka Pakapaka

Posts : 7611
Join date : 2012-08-24

Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Guest Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:10 pm

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.
Chitrakoot originally (with the Ramayana connection / narration) referred to the mountainous / forest region where Valmiki's hermitage was located (in forest / mountain area), corresponding to the Vindhya (Vindhyachal) mountain range which lies mostly in the direction / side of MP.
It is possible that they lived on the MP side of Chitrakoot and relieved themselves on the UP side of Chitrakoot. That explains why bhaiyyas are still bimaru. Vindhyachal on the UP side is now called Mirzapur because of monomaniac infestation.

Mirzapur is a district; Vindhyachal is a town within this district: a fine example of H-M synthesis. they are believed to have lived on the Kamadgiri hill which is on the UP side of Chitrakoot. (When you go to Chitrakoot you are supposed to do a parikrama--circumambulation--of this Kamadgiri hill since it is believed to be especially sacred, just like Govardhan hill is especially sacred in the Krishna mythology.)

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Seva Lamberdar Sat Mar 18, 2017 12:59 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Seva Lamberdar wrote:Chitrakoot (in Sanskrit meaning "picturesque abode") is mentioned in the Valmiki Ramayana, referring to the mountainous region where Valmiki's hermitage was located. The original Chitrakoot (with Ramayana connection and having the religious significance) lies mostly in Madhya Pradesh near the  MP / UP border. Extension of Chitrakoot into UP is of a later origin (like a city expanding over time into the suburbia). It's interesting that they found the fossils of earliest-known plants in that area (Chitrakoot).

not true. it is true that Chitrakoot spans both UP and MP, but the Kamadgiri hill where Lord Rama is believed to have resided while in Chitrakoot is in UP.
Chitrakoot originally (with the Ramayana connection / narration) referred to the mountainous / forest region where Valmiki's hermitage was located (in forest / mountain area), corresponding to the Vindhya (Vindhyachal) mountain range which lies mostly in the direction / side of MP.
It is possible that they lived on the MP side of Chitrakoot and relieved themselves on the UP side of Chitrakoot. That explains why bhaiyyas are still bimaru. Vindhyachal on the UP side is now called Mirzapur because of monomaniac infestation.

Mirzapur is a district; Vindhyachal is a town within this district: a fine example of H-M synthesis. they are believed to have lived on the Kamadgiri hill which is on the UP side of Chitrakoot. (When you go to Chitrakoot you are supposed to do a parikrama--circumambulation--of this Kamadgiri hill since it is believed to be especially sacred, just like Govardhan hill is especially sacred in the Krishna mythology.)
UP connection with Ramayana Chitrakoot seems quite weak / flimsy. Ramayana talks about Chitrakoot in a deep forest (such as deep / vast  Vindhyas in MP), rather than a single or few small hills in UP (about which people can easily circumambulate).
Seva Lamberdar
Seva Lamberdar

Posts : 6594
Join date : 2012-11-29

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bYp0igbxHcmg1G1J-qw0VUBSn7Fu

Back to top Go down

1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants Empty Re: 1.6-Billion-Year-Old Fossils Found in Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh) May Represent Earliest-Known Plants

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum