President Trump deserves Americans' gratitude

by silvermani Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:45 pm

He prevented the career criminal Hitlary from becoming President. Sure, he has his flaws but he is way better than Hitlary. I still don't regret not voting for her despite being a registered democrat.

by FluteHolder Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:59 pm

http://lawflog.com/?p=1832

As if we needed any more evidence that the FBI was politicized under James Comey, we get this in a Friday evening document dump: The top attorney for the FBI and an attorney representing Hillary Clinton loyalists worked together to keep politically-damaging computer contents from being subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.

Beth Wilkinson, wife of former NBC host and current CNN commentator David Gregory, represented Clinton aides Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, and Jake Sullivan during the FBI’s investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s secret email server, and Ms. Wilkinson apparently convinced an all-too-cooperative FBI to protect the contents of Ms. Mills’s and Ms. Samuelson’s laptop computers from public scrutiny.

“The Government explicitly agreed that the FBI would not assert custody and control of the devices in the face of Freedom of Information Act requests,” Ms. Wilkinson wrote in an August 11, 2016 email from Ms. Wilkinson to James A. Baker, who was then the general counsel of the FBI. Here’s an excerpt from the agreement that Ms. Wilkinson cut-and-pasted into her email.

The Device is being provided to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) solely for the purposes of the Department of Justice Investigation, and for the Department’s use in connection with the investigation. In voluntarily providing the Device, Cheryl Mills does not relinquish ownership or control over the Device, except for the FBI’s limited investigative use as specified by this agreement. The FBI does not assert custody and control over the Device or its contents for any other purposes, including any requests made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552.

by Idéfix Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:04 pm

The party of personal responsibility blames Obama and Clinton for the horrible person they put in office. Then they double down and blame the Democrats for shutting down a government while they control all branches of it.

by Idéfix Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:06 pm

silvermani wrote:Sure, he has his flaws

What flaws? I don't remember seeing you talk about any of his flaws.

by SomeProfile Tue Jan 30, 2018 6:36 pm

It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too! Sad

President Trump deserves Americans' gratitude 161109045042-election2016-wellesley-4-exlarge-169

by MaxEntropy_Man Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:00 pm

So glad you have as brown an arse as the Mexican and Muslim that the average Dump supporter hates so much SomeP. To him it matters not a jot you're a conservative and a Hillary hater.

Very Happy

Maybe you'll try using Fair and Lovely.

by silvermani Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:05 pm

Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:Sure, he has his flaws
What flaws? I don't remember seeing you talk about any of his flaws.

Some time ago I had posted a link to a news article about his hotel importing workers on work visa.

by Idéfix Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:29 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:So glad you have as brown an arse as the Mexican and Muslim that the average Dump supporter hates so much SomeP. To him it matters not a jot you're a conservative and a Hillary hater.

Maybe you'll try using Fair and Lovely.

Trumptards will gladly let Drumpf take a dump in their mouths if they think their liberal neighbors will find that stench unbearable.

by Idéfix Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:35 pm

silvermani wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:Sure, he has his flaws
What flaws? I don't remember seeing you talk about any of his flaws.
Some time ago I had posted a link to a news article about his hotel importing workers on work visa.

As they ask in the tech industry, was that a feature or a bug?

It is interesting to note how far you will go in supporting this despicable person... supporting a pedophile for senate and paying hush money to a pornstar with whom he had an affair months after his third wife didn't seem like flaws to you.

by silvermani Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:16 am

- One more reason

by southindian Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:18 am

silvermani wrote:He prevented the career criminal Hitlary from becoming President. Sure, he has his flaws but he is way better than Hitlary. I still don't regret not voting for her despite being a registered democrat.

Just like you killed your parents 7 years ago and dumped their bodies?

I found proof of your crime at same source where Hillary's criminal charges are documented.

by southindian Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:53 am

silvermani wrote:- One more reason

Thanks President Obama for the ground work.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:55 am

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:03 pm

SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

by silvermani Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:02 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:17 pm

silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too! :(

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.

Maybe move to Canada/France like some claimed during GWB's time.

by Idéfix Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:23 pm

silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.

I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:14 pm

Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.

And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:32 pm

Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

by SomeProfile Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:33 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .

Exactly! LOL!

by SomeProfile Wed Jan 31, 2018 10:45 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

It is hard for snow flakes and rice flakes to understand 2-3 things:

1. People can support something or someone purely based on principles without getting any like-backs in return for the support.

2. It is possible for people to live without being liked back by everyone.

3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

by MaxEntropy_Man Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:00 pm

SomeProfile wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

It is hard for snow flakes and rice flakes to understand 2-3 things:

1. People can support something or someone purely based on principles without getting any like-backs in return for the support.

2. It is possible for people to live without being liked back by everyone.

3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

Just the kind of moron Trump and others of his ilk like. They'll kick you in your gonads and you guys still lick his orange arse. What better voter does a politician like who'll give his vote without expecting anything in return and will in fact willingly take disdain! You're not a snowflake. You're a cabbage.

by Hellsangel Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:12 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

It is hard for snow flakes and rice flakes to understand 2-3 things:

1. People can support something or someone purely based on principles without getting any like-backs in return for the support.

2. It is possible for people to live without being liked back by everyone.

3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

Just the kind of moron Trump and others of his ilk like. They'll kick you in your gonads and you guys still lick his orange arse. What better voter does a politician like who'll give his vote without expecting anything in return and will in fact willingly take disdain! You're not a snowflake. You're a cabbage.

Il Professore seems to have been watching a lot of kinky porn, considering his descriptions. Plus he seems to have taken lessons in race baiting from Al Sharpton.

by Idéfix Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:08 am

Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:It's not a flaw to make the libtards cry daily. Libtards have feelings too!

They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .

As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.

by Idéfix Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:16 am

SomeProfile wrote:3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

I have no quarrel with your first two points. But this one is just false. Paul Ryan, no supporter of Hillary Clinton nor opponent of Trump, said one of Trump's statements was sort of like "the textbook definition" of a racist statement. He called for more immigrants from countries like Norway and fewer from African countries and Haiti; that is another textbook definition of racism. When you judge -- and advocate policies for the government to judge -- people based on their race or national origin, that is the very definition of racism. It is possible that you do not see this because you are a racist yourself.

by Hellsangel Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:22 am

Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
They've been especially vocal with their impotent rage here especially after that Tuesday in November 2016 when only a day before, they were gloating.

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .
As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.

And continue on your binary thinking, seeking validation.

"Oh please tell me. Are you for Trump or against Trump?"

by Idéfix Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:23 am

Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
silvermani wrote:

I wonder what they will do if he wins a second term.
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .
As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.
And continue on your binary thinking, seeking validation.

"Oh please tell me. Are you for Trump or against Trump?"

I get no validation from knowing that you support Trump. Or from knowing you don't support him.

by Hellsangel Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:24 am

Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
I will do everything I can to prevent him from winning a second time. If he wins a second time, I will congratulate you and his other supporters. Not very different from what I did the first time he won, come to think of it.
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .
As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.
And continue on your binary thinking, seeking validation.

"Oh please tell me. Are you for Trump or against Trump?"
I get no validation from knowing that you support Trump. Or from knowing you don't support him.

Sure.

by Idéfix Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:31 am

Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
And continue to rant on a virtual soapbox which won't be very different from the first time either .
As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.
And continue on your binary thinking, seeking validation.

"Oh please tell me. Are you for Trump or against Trump?"
I get no validation from knowing that you support Trump. Or from knowing you don't support him.
Sure.

For a guy who has no opinion to express, you have a lot to say. Go ahead, have the last word.

by Hellsangel Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:33 am

Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
As opposed to what you are doing, I presume... be scared of saying whether, or not, you support the president.
And continue on your binary thinking, seeking validation.

"Oh please tell me. Are you for Trump or against Trump?"
I get no validation from knowing that you support Trump. Or from knowing you don't support him.
Sure.
For a guy who has no opinion to express, you have a lot to say. Go ahead, have the last word.

Thank you, Mr Kaan.

by SomeProfile Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:27 pm

Idéfix wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.
I have no quarrel with your first two points. But this one is just false. Paul Ryan, no supporter of Hillary Clinton nor opponent of Trump, said one of Trump's statements was sort of like "the textbook definition" of a racist statement. He called for more immigrants from countries like Norway and fewer from African countries and Haiti; that is another textbook definition of racism. When you judge -- and advocate policies for the government to judge -- people based on their race or national origin, that is the very definition of racism. It is possible that you do not see this because you are a racist yourself.

Today I learned two things:

The ONLY difference between Haiti and Norway is the color of the skin of the respective citizens.
When someone says they prefer immigration from countries like Norway and not from countries like Haiti, the ONLY thing they could mean is they want immigration from white countries and not from black countries because of # 1 above. They absolutely cannot mean that they prefer immigration from developed countries with better skilled citizens than from under developed countries with under skilled citizens.

Oh, here's a bonus learning:

When I support Diversity Visa lottery and oppose the guy who is saying that Diversity Visa lottery should be scrapped in favor of merit-based immigration, I am not being racist at all, because the Diversity Visa totally does not consider race and nationality as the primary criteria!

Liberalism truly is a mental illness!

by Hellsangel Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:28 pm

SomeProfile wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.
I have no quarrel with your first two points. But this one is just false. Paul Ryan, no supporter of Hillary Clinton nor opponent of Trump, said one of Trump's statements was sort of like "the textbook definition" of a racist statement. He called for more immigrants from countries like Norway and fewer from African countries and Haiti; that is another textbook definition of racism. When you judge -- and advocate policies for the government to judge -- people based on their race or national origin, that is the very definition of racism. It is possible that you do not see this because you are a racist yourself.

Today I learned two things:

The ONLY difference between Haiti and Norway is the color of the skin of the respective citizens.
When someone says they prefer immigration from countries like Norway and not from countries like Haiti, the ONLY thing they could mean is they want immigration from white countries and not from black countries because of # 1 above. They absolutely cannot mean that they prefer immigration from developed countries with better skilled citizens than from under developed countries with under skilled citizens.

Oh, here's a bonus learning:

3. When I support Diversity Visa lottery and oppose the guy who is saying that Diversity Visa lottery should be scrapped in favor of merit-based immigration, I am not being racist at all, because the Diversity Visa totally does not consider race and nationality as the primary criteria!

Liberalism truly is a mental illness!

I wonder how Il Professore feels about affirmative action.

by SomeProfile Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:30 pm

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

It is hard for snow flakes and rice flakes to understand 2-3 things:

1. People can support something or someone purely based on principles without getting any like-backs in return for the support.

2. It is possible for people to live without being liked back by everyone.

3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

Just the kind of moron Trump and others of his ilk like. They'll kick you in your gonads and you guys still lick his orange arse. What better voter does a politician like who'll give his vote without expecting anything in return and will in fact willingly take disdain! You're not a snowflake. You're a cabbage.

LOL! We will believe you cuz you have been so spot-on with all your other predictions about Trump, starting from his not getting Republican nomination to not winning the Presidential election to...

by Idéfix Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:43 pm

SomeProfile wrote:
Idéfix wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.
I have no quarrel with your first two points. But this one is just false. Paul Ryan, no supporter of Hillary Clinton nor opponent of Trump, said one of Trump's statements was sort of like "the textbook definition" of a racist statement. He called for more immigrants from countries like Norway and fewer from African countries and Haiti; that is another textbook definition of racism. When you judge -- and advocate policies for the government to judge -- people based on their race or national origin, that is the very definition of racism. It is possible that you do not see this because you are a racist yourself.

Today I learned two things:

The ONLY difference between Haiti and Norway is the color of the skin of the respective citizens.
When someone says they prefer immigration from countries like Norway and not from countries like Haiti, the ONLY thing they could mean is they want immigration from white countries and not from black countries because of # 1 above. They absolutely cannot mean that they prefer immigration from developed countries with better skilled citizens than from under developed countries with under skilled citizens.

The problem is with using national origin to decide what to do with individual people. That is what makes it racist. There are educated people in Haiti, and uneducated people in Norway. If the goal of the policy is to bring in more educated people, that is what should be stated; not that you want more Norwegians and fewer Haitians.

SomeProfile wrote:Oh, here's a bonus learning:

When I support Diversity Visa lottery and oppose the guy who is saying that Diversity Visa lottery should be scrapped in favor of merit-based immigration, I am not being racist at all, because the Diversity Visa totally does not consider race and nationality as the primary criteria!

Scrapping the diversity visa lottery is not racist. Making an argument to scrap it using "I want more Norwegians and fewer Haitians" as the logic is definitely racist.

Your contention was that Trump is no more racist than Hillary. That is just plain false. His own party's House Speaker called his words "the textbook definition" of racism. That would be like Pelosi calling something Hillary said "the textbook definition" of racism.

SomeProfile wrote:Liberalism truly is a mental illness!

Racism is a lot more like a mental illness than liberalism is, but people suffering from it rarely know that they are suffering from it.

by silvermani Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:55 pm

Even as the wrist slitting and sulking by illiberals continues, more good news is pouring in.

UPS today announced more than $12 billion in investments to expand the company's Smart Logistics Network, significantly increase pension funding, and position the company to further enhance shareowner value. "This $12 billion investment program is an outgrowth of the opportunity for tax savings created by the Tax and Jobs Act," said David Abney, UPS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "We will increase network investments and accelerate pension funding to strengthen the company for the long term, so that we maximize the benefit to our global customers, employees and shareowners."

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:26 pm

SomeProfile wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:
SomeProfile wrote:
MaxEntropy_Man wrote:Lots of brown arse idiots who don't realize the game has changed fundamentally. Nobody cares you're a Hillary hater and don't like dems on some principled basis. Your behind is as brown and as scary to them as those Mozlems and Messicans they hate so much.

It is hard for snow flakes and rice flakes to understand 2-3 things:

1. People can support something or someone purely based on principles without getting any like-backs in return for the support.

2. It is possible for people to live without being liked back by everyone.

3. Trump and most of his supporters are not any more or any less racist than Hillary or her supporters.

Just the kind of moron Trump and others of his ilk like. They'll kick you in your gonads and you guys still lick his orange arse. What better voter does a politician like who'll give his vote without expecting anything in return and will in fact willingly take disdain! You're not a snowflake. You're a cabbage.

LOL! We will believe you cuz you have been so spot-on with all your other predictions about Trump, starting from his not getting Republican nomination to not winning the Presidential election to...

That you're a brown arsed cabbage is not a prediction. It's a statement of fact.

by TruthSeeker Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:35 pm

A month late, but a Happy New Year to U Max.

by MaxEntropy_Man Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:44 pm

TruthSeeker wrote:A month late, but a Happy New Year to U Max.

Likewise.

by TruthSeeker Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:46 pm

(-:

Best wishes to U n Urs always,
TS.

by Sponsored content