Rashmun, what do you think about this?

by MulaiAzhagi Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:23 am

There is, for instance, a statement by an activist immediately after the Sabarmati Express was set on fire, and 59 Hindus, mostly women and children, were burnt alive. This person said: 'While I condemn today's gruesome attack, you cannot pick up an incident in isolation. Let us not forget the provocation. These people were not going for a benign assembly. They were indulging in blatant and unlawful mobilisation to build a temple and deliberately provoke the Muslims in India.'

Now imagine that this person sits on the all-powerful National Advisory Council! Let us now further imagine that this person has relentlessly filed petition after petition against Modi and is yet considered a credible spokesperson.

http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-social-contract-why-modi-scares-the-usual-suspects/20120301.htm

===> Were those women and children who were among the 59 burnt to death provocative?

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:51 am

All the killings need to be condemned. There can be no excuse for killing the 59 people in Sabarmati Express. Having said that, the killings that took place after this incident need to also be condemned.

by chameli Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:06 pm

Once a mob is incited ..and it ran helter skelter after the train was burnt ..it is difficult to control ..

why does the media concentrate only on the killings that followed ?

why not on the unprovoked train burning ?

by Sponsored content

Rashmun, what do you think about this?

Rashmun, what do you think about this?

Re: Rashmun, what do you think about this?

Re: Rashmun, what do you think about this?

Re: Rashmun, what do you think about this?