Be nice please on Tracy Whitney

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:03 am

Trashy is E.A.Z.Y (suave guy)
started by be nice please 3 yrs ago
You said you are looking for a woman? There is no one easier than our resident bimbo Trashy Whitney. She is a married housewife with kids and no life. A bit uncouth and smelly though. Husband treats her like a door mat (just as she deserves) hence she comes to CH looking for validation. She has often tried to press her, lemme quote. "b00bs against a glass window" just to see how it feels. So far, that has only resulted in the teenage boys standing outside her window to puke in disgust. That is the second reason why she NEEDS to be on CH daily. She hangs out here posting her stupid stories and dumb questions ("bhat? bhy?" etc) all day long from AM to PM. She has a misrable life imprisioned in a crappy marriage with uno hope of ever/u scoring with another man and will sleep with anything that has a peniss. So if fat chicks is your thing, go for her Bnp PS: I would offer myself, but I am actaully a man, Shhh dont tell anyone

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-is-e-a-z-y-suave-guy-936376.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:06 am

Tracy Whitney posted Re: Who is John Galt? Errr Jatadhari? on 3 yrs ago
Who the hell is Jatadhari?

Propagandhi711 posted Re: Who is John Galt? Errr Jatadhari? on 3 yrs ago
jatadhari? he's a legend. a gujju among mere gults. one that knew the combination to queerbee's ironbox. you dont want to know the trouble he got chubby psychotic into.

Tracy Whitney posted Re: Who is John Galt? Errr Jatadhari? on 3 yrs ago
I do want to know if it's not too much of a trouble. I am always up for a 'true' story.

be nice please posted Re: Who is John Galt? Errr Jatadhari? on 3 yrs ago
Sure you are. Let your snotty kids run around boisterouly in your basement grocery store while you sit your fat ass on the rickety chair and exchange 'true' stories with men on CH who you hope one day will bed you

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-is-e-a-z-y-suave-guy-936376.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:08 am

be nice please posted Re: Who is John Galt? Errr Jatadhari? on 3 yrs ago
* Ass Licking alert* * Ass Licking alert* Trashy you never fail to lick boot.

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-is-e-a-z-y-suave-guy-936376.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:09 am

be nice please posted Re:Trashy is E.A.Z.Y (suave guy) on 3 yrs ago
Trashy Bai, where do you disappear after reading my posts?

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-is-e-a-z-y-suave-guy-936376.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:11 am

How is the weight loss going Trashy aunty?
started by be nice please 3 yrs ago
I sincerely hope that you someday win this constant battle with being overweight. Finally when you shed those pounds and get back to 200Lbs, may be you too can dance like Beyonce on a cheezy number.

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/how-is-the-weight-loss-going-trashy-aunty-936273.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:19 am

Propa the rockstar
started by Tracy Whitney 3 yrs ago
*looks at ya through the coke glasses* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCZHQBN3AEw

be nice please posted Re:Propa the rockstar on 3 yrs ago
Trashy I know that you are getting desparate, but will you lick evrybody's arse here to garner supposrt. You already did joblesssfella, petra, bittu among others. And not tho mention that whiny sad song to Team Sulekha. You are pathetic

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/propa-the-rockstar-936321.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:21 am

Trashy- Follow up
started by be nice please 3 yrs ago
Good morning Trashy How are you today? Just wanted to follow up on the whiny-snotty-boo-hoo-complaint that you wrote to Team Sulekha that took you all night to write. Were they impressed by your hard work to resurrect a 2 year old post? Lemme know if you need help writing a more formal letter. My english may not be that good but is slightly better than yours.
Bnp

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-follow-up-936147.htm

by Hellsangel Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:30 am

Looks like it is #1 who rattled you.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:42 am

Trashed Housewife, Why I have no life outside of CH, and other stories...

started by
be nice please 2 yrs ago

Good morning Trashy ,

I urge you not to leave. If you leave this avatar, who will post 1
cheezy Jitinder song a day? Who will bat her eyelids and ask dumb
question like what is a vagina and how are babies made? Who will post
delicious stories of how it felt when you pressed your cup A sized boobs
against a glass window (with your clothes on of course). If you hair
were blond and not oily brown, you would be a quintessential dumb blond
(albeit ugly).

I am disturbed by your psychoticness to switch handles just to take
revenge on a CH "handle". I am 100% sure this is the work of a woman.
And that woman is you. Ah and your timing was impeccable, werent you
secretly hoping that ppl would think that it was Bittu Sharma Boy2girl?
You naught you! :-p. Only woman can be sneaky, men will be vulgar to
your face.

No body loves anybody else on CH 'that' much that they will
invent a handle and go stalker on it all day long.This is definitely the
work of the 'wounded' . Your conversation with yourself when you got
weary in the end was lovely. If you did not speak such bad engliss
and did not show so much anger, frustration and psychotic-stalker
behavior, you would not have given it away so easily, that the other
retard handle was you. That was clearly the work of the 'wounded'
Just because you may have been longer on the board does not necessarily
mean that you are saner or more conscientious. (yeah look it up in the
beeehari to english dikshinary)

I don't know who you are and have seen you on CH recently, from what I
remember of my little interaction with you, you are a harmless boring
person.

I may have even exchanged some normal-pleasant posts with you.I
did not notice you till recently when you started taking pot shots at
me. Woman, this is going to be my 1 and only serious interaction with
you. Even though you are vacouus in the brains department, I do this
only because (to my surprise:) you are still crying like a snotty kid
with a runny nose and throwing a tantrum on CH. Jesus Christ, why do
people take handles so seriously. There are *so many* people who need
to get a life outside of CH Ok here you go, internalize this: If you
take jabs at me, I will ignore you. But, if you decide to continue and
are asking for it - I WILL put you in your place. And that would involve
you having to suck a lottta dog poop. Ok? ok.

Anyway coming back to the main topic, I know you have had a lifelong
struggle with being overweight that’s why you look for constant
gratification on CH, but thats ok, fat chicks can be sexy too. Though
you will need to moderate your cheeziness and dubmness in general. Or
else there is a high possibility that you will end up dying fat, just
like I might end up dying single and a virgin.

Love,
Bnp

Next Story, Why I do have no life outside of CH?

Because I don't uwant to/u have a life outside of CH. I am 46, single,
never been laid. No friends (TW, i meant frAnds), family, acquaintances.
I am 6.4inches tall, Chest=flat, waist=48 inches, ass=non-existant.
Having dark scaly skin doesn't help either.

I thought my life is coming
to an end and was about to jump from the same building as JBF was.

But then something amazing happened. I discovered Sulekha Coffehouse.
The elixir for miserable lost souls like me. What a revelation it was.
It restored my faith in humanity. I mean the kind of love, affection
and amusemetn I have received from people here, I have NEVER receive
before.....and I am sure I will NEVER receive anywhere else. Enamel,
Team Suleka, Priya are now friends for life. When I wake up in the AM,
there is nothing more I look forward to than CH forums. I wish there
were 30 hours in a day. Then, I would be on CH 30-7.

Pardon the, typos, spelling mistakes, bad grammar, bold, the italics
and the underline. I am not capable of writing better engliss. I can
write like this only.Trashed Housewife, Why I have no life outside of CH, and other stories...

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashed-housewife-why-i-have-no-life-outside-of-ch-and-other-stories-934919.htm

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:06 am

Trashy Whitney is missing...
started by be nice please 3 yrs ago
And I am missing Trashy Whitney

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/trashy-whitney-is-missing-936258.htm

by Impedimenta Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:08 am

are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:13 am

Impedimenta wrote:are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then that one poster has the right to fight back in all possible ways. I did not start this fight; Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Tracy had a choice: get involved in the fight or stay out of the fight. She chose the former. Every single time she jumps to pick sides, she always ends up attacking me directly or indirectly. So i have the right to hit back at her in whatever way i choose.

May i suggest that you stay out of this?

by doofus_maximus Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:45 am

Rashmun wrote:
Impedimenta wrote:are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then that one poster has the right to fight back in all possible ways. I did not start this fight; Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Tracy had a choice: get involved in the fight or stay out of the fight. She chose the former. Every single time she jumps to pick sides, she always ends up attacking me directly or indirectly. So i have the right to hit back at her in whatever way i choose.

May i suggest that you stay out of this?

dude..seriously. are you that attached to your handle on an anonymous forum. You have been on this stupid crusade over something so trivial.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:45 am

Aww rashu, tujhe to bura lag gaya. Sorry yaar. Main to sirf time pass kar rahi thee. With the polls and all.

Chalo, ab gussa thook do. Ok?

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:51 am

Rashmun wrote:Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.

Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Rashmun wrote:May i suggest that you stay out of this?

Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:06 am

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason our fight kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:May i suggest that you stay out of this?
Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:12 am

Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason it kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:May i suggest that you stay out of this?
Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.

You seem to think the amount of sense in a post is directly proportional to its length. So to rattle you more, I will keep this brief. If I am discredited and you are ok, why are you running around dredging up mud about others? Why are you becoming a KV-like spectacle here? Take a pause from posting for at least 2 hours and think about that.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:13 am

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason it kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:May i suggest that you stay out of this?
Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.
You seem to think the amount of sense in a post is directly proportional to its length. So to rattle you more, I will keep this brief. If I am discredited and you are ok, why are you running around dredging up mud about others? Why are you becoming a KV-like spectacle here? Take a pause from posting for at least 2 hours and think about that.

i wanted to tell Tracy not to behave like your surrogate.

by Propagandhi711 Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:33 am

doofus_maximus wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Impedimenta wrote:are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then that one poster has the right to fight back in all possible ways. I did not start this fight; Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Tracy had a choice: get involved in the fight or stay out of the fight. She chose the former. Every single time she jumps to pick sides, she always ends up attacking me directly or indirectly. So i have the right to hit back at her in whatever way i choose.

May i suggest that you stay out of this?

dude..seriously. are you that attached to your handle on an anonymous forum. You have been on this stupid crusade over something so trivial.

dont call him seriously. his name is not seriously. it's trashamun, middle name craptacular..

by doofus_maximus Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:36 am

Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason it kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:May i suggest that you stay out of this?
Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.
You seem to think the amount of sense in a post is directly proportional to its length. So to rattle you more, I will keep this brief. If I am discredited and you are ok, why are you running around dredging up mud about others? Why are you becoming a KV-like spectacle here? Take a pause from posting for at least 2 hours and think about that.

i wanted to tell Tracy not to behave like your surrogate.

Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:37 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:
doofus_maximus wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Impedimenta wrote:are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then that one poster has the right to fight back in all possible ways. I did not start this fight; Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Tracy had a choice: get involved in the fight or stay out of the fight. She chose the former. Every single time she jumps to pick sides, she always ends up attacking me directly or indirectly. So i have the right to hit back at her in whatever way i choose.

May i suggest that you stay out of this?

dude..seriously. are you that attached to your handle on an anonymous forum. You have been on this stupid crusade over something so trivial.

dont call him seriously. his name is not seriously. it's trashamun, middle name craptacular..

Poopa jumps into the fray on behalf of his Gult Brother Charvaka.

by doofus_maximus Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:38 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:
doofus_maximus wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Impedimenta wrote:are you that jobless? seriously, most here have been trashed in the old forum. what is the point on bringing trash posts into this new forum?

absolutely not in good taste. even my web sense is flagging such nonsense R.

if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then that one poster has the right to fight back in all possible ways. I did not start this fight; Charvaka did when he coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and then kept using it again and again in post after post.
Tracy had a choice: get involved in the fight or stay out of the fight. She chose the former. Every single time she jumps to pick sides, she always ends up attacking me directly or indirectly. So i have the right to hit back at her in whatever way i choose.

May i suggest that you stay out of this?

dude..seriously. are you that attached to your handle on an anonymous forum. You have been on this stupid crusade over something so trivial.

dont call him seriously. his name is not seriously. it's trashamun, middle name craptacular..

I should call him Shirley..

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:42 am

doofus_maximus wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:Yes, I knew it! Awesome, I win the "who rattled Rashmun" contest. If someone criticizes your method of argumentation, your response is to make that method much worse!

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason it kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Charvaka wrote:Is that a threat? If she doesn't "stay out of this" are you going to dredge up nonsense about her and post it here?

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.
You seem to think the amount of sense in a post is directly proportional to its length. So to rattle you more, I will keep this brief. If I am discredited and you are ok, why are you running around dredging up mud about others? Why are you becoming a KV-like spectacle here? Take a pause from posting for at least 2 hours and think about that.

i wanted to tell Tracy not to behave like your surrogate.

Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:50 am

Rashmun wrote:
DM wrote:Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:58 am

Rashmun wrote:
doofus_maximus wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:

Your criticism is biased and prejudiced because you never coined this phrase for the several years when you kept on praising my history and philosophy posts. you only coined it, disparaged it, and kept referring to it again and again in your posts after my posts on Diggy Raja. As i have mentioned earlier, this tactic of yours only ended up discrediting you.

Furthermore, the reason it kept going on and on was because you kept sniping at me and whenever that happened, i kept hitting back. Every time i have counter attacked, i have invariably found you running away from the thread with egg on your face. A good example is here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have intermittently tried putting you on ignore to see how you would react. In other words, I allowed you to snipe at me a few times without reacting. You took this to be a sign of weakness and only increased the intensity of your sniping. And so i had to step in and put you in your place.

Since you are essentially a coward, you love getting surrogates to fight your battles. Unfortunately, it won't work in the case of Impy because i have known her on CH for at least as long as you have. She is like Max in this respect. She and Max will not take sides in any fight. And hence they deserve the respect of other posters here.
You seem to think the amount of sense in a post is directly proportional to its length. So to rattle you more, I will keep this brief. If I am discredited and you are ok, why are you running around dredging up mud about others? Why are you becoming a KV-like spectacle here? Take a pause from posting for at least 2 hours and think about that.

i wanted to tell Tracy not to behave like your surrogate.

Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

No, she is listening to you now. She is totally convinced by your argument, whatever that happens to be.

by chameli Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:59 am

rashmun,

old posts raked up i see . You must be mighty offended

who is this "be nice please " ? is he /she here now ?

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:00 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
DM wrote:Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:02 pm

chameli wrote:rashmun,

old posts raked up i see . You must be mighty offended

who is this "be nice please " ? is he /she here now ?

be nice please is not around to the best of my knowledge. She and Tracy had a bitter relationship on CH.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:09 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
DM wrote:Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

The akka dig up old posts to prove your point wrong. To tell you on your face, many times how you are lying. How is that akin to you posting 8-9-10 posts out of random, just so that I 'listen' to you?

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:11 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
DM wrote:Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

The akka dig up old posts to prove your point wrong. To tell you on your face, many times how you are lying. How is that akin to you posting 8-9-10 posts out of random, just so that I 'listen' to you?

You are angry. You are upset. You are whining.

by Impedimenta Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:13 pm

aiyoo R, leave al this. not worth your time. here read this first

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/android-photos/?ref=technology

then, read about romney and santorum and then submit a thesis on why the santorum joker is trying to split delegate votes instead of letting the only electable[closest] candidate romney to win the nomination. I expect a report on my desk by the end of the day. no? fine.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:16 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

The akka dig up old posts to prove your point wrong. To tell you on your face, many times how you are lying. How is that akin to you posting 8-9-10 posts out of random, just so that I 'listen' to you?

You are angry. You are upset. You are whining.

Actually, as of now, this is me ---> Shocked

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:26 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
DM wrote:Kanna *imagine Rajini spouting a Punch Dialog*...

You could have told her directly instead of dredging up sordid post from the past.

u think she would have listened to me if i would have told this to her directly?

Among pre-schoolers, this term is called 'negative attention seeking'. Bang you head on the wall, yeah. That will make them adults look at you.

Among adults, maybe this is what goes into the heads of people who open fire in schools or building. Or even terrorists. 'you not listening to me? wait till I hijack a plane and smash it into a building. Then for sure you will listen'.

this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

The akka dig up old posts to prove your point wrong. To tell you on your face, many times how you are lying. How is that akin to you posting 8-9-10 posts out of random, just so that I 'listen' to you?

What Charvaka started doing was digging up past posts of mine in which i had used uncouth language in the midst of heated debates. Charvaka's claim was that my real character shines through in these heated discussions. He quickly shut up though, and stopped this line of attack, when it was pointed out to him--with specific examples-- that the language i have used in the past is no worse than what his Gult Brothers have used.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:02 pm

Rashmun wrote:if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then..

then you cannot do anything. rashu, your name is rashmun, not sunny deol, ok? control bhai. b+ (be positive). eat healthy, do a bit of yoga/exercise. read books. and get into heated discussions without taking anything personally. only stupid fools like salman rushdie take arguments personally.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:07 pm

Huzefa Kapasi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then..

then you cannot do anything. rashu, your name is rashmun, not sunny deol, ok? control bhai. b+ (be positive). eat healthy, do a bit of yoga/exercise. read books. and get into heated discussions without taking anything personally. only stupid fools like salman rushdie take arguments personally.

in my opinion, multiple posters ganging up against one single poster will just create a lot of muck flying in all directions if that single poster happens to be an experienced, battle hardened poster. this is something Charvaka should have known since he has not only been a regular poster on Sulekha but has also participated in numerous heated discussions on the chowk site according to what he disclosed once.

by Propagandhi711 Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:27 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Huzefa Kapasi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then..

then you cannot do anything. rashu, your name is rashmun, not sunny deol, ok? control bhai. b+ (be positive). eat healthy, do a bit of yoga/exercise. read books. and get into heated discussions without taking anything personally. only stupid fools like salman rushdie take arguments personally.

in my opinion, multiple posters ganging up against one single poster will just create a lot of muck flying in all directions if that single poster happens to be an experienced, battle hardened poster. this is something Charvaka should have known since he has not only been a regular poster on Sulekha but has also participated in numerous heated discussions on the chowk site according to what he disclosed once.

@battle hardened poster with his unmanned (shemaled) drone.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:37 pm

Rashmun wrote:also participated in numerous heated discussions on the chowk site according to what he disclosed once.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:38 pm

Rashmun wrote:Charvaka's claim was that my real character shines through in these heated discussions.

It does.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:40 pm

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka's claim was that my real character shines through in these heated discussions.
It does.

You ran away from the thread when i pointed out that your Gult Brothers Propagandhi and Truthbetold have used similar language but we have never seen you questioning their character. Is it because they are fellow Gults, and i am not?

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:48 pm

Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:Charvaka's claim was that my real character shines through in these heated discussions.
It does.

You ran away from the thread when i pointed out that your Gult Brothers Propagandhi and Truthbetold have used similar language but we have never seen you questioning their character. Is it because they are fellow Gults, and i am not?

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

I have said the same things about their use of that kind of language that I have said to you. They didn't whine about it. You do. I made all the points I needed to make on that thread.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:50 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Huzefa Kapasi wrote:
Rashmun wrote:if multiple posters are ganging up against one poster then..

then you cannot do anything. rashu, your name is rashmun, not sunny deol, ok? control bhai. b+ (be positive). eat healthy, do a bit of yoga/exercise. read books. and get into heated discussions without taking anything personally. only stupid fools like salman rushdie take arguments personally.

in my opinion, multiple posters ganging up against one single poster will just create a lot of muck flying in all directions if that single poster happens to be an experienced, battle hardened poster. this is something Charvaka should have known since he has not only been a regular poster on Sulekha but has also participated in numerous heated discussions on the chowk site according to what he disclosed once.

i will say one more thing. i would have had no issues with Charvaka if he would have criticized me about anything i said. i did have a problem when he tried to paint me in a black and white fashion by coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and using it again and again in his posts to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed. By doing so he dented his own credibility because for years and years he had been showering praise on my history and philosophy posts on sulekha.

And all this because he did not like my posts on Diggy Raja.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:52 pm

Rashmun wrote:this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954

Whenever you lie about the past -- as you have taken to doing rather often -- I will be happy to prove it to you with your own past posts. If your past posts discredit you, that's your problem not mine.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:53 pm

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954
Whenever you lie about the past -- as you have taken to doing rather often -- I will be happy to prove it to you with your own past posts. If your past posts discredit you, that's your problem not mine.

the question was not about lying but about your claim that my real character is revealed in heated discussions. When i pointed out--with examples-- that your fellow Gults have used language as worse as i have you ran away from the thread.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:55 pm

Rashmun wrote:i will say one more thing. i would have had no issues with Charvaka if he would have criticized me about anything i said. i did have a problem when he tried to paint me in a black and white fashion by coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and using it again and again in his posts to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed.

I apologize sincerely for hurting you so deeply. Had I realized that it was going to do such damage to your psyche, believe me I would not have done that.

Rashmun wrote:And all this because he did not like my posts on Diggy Raja.

No. I did that because I did not like the arguments you used to defend Diggy Raja. I was critiquing your craptacular illogic, and that had little to do with Diggy.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:57 pm

Rashmun wrote:to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed.

Where did I say that? I readily agree with some things you say.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:00 pm

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:i will say one more thing. i would have had no issues with Charvaka if he would have criticized me about anything i said. i did have a problem when he tried to paint me in a black and white fashion by coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and using it again and again in his posts to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed.
I apologize sincerely for hurting you so deeply. Had I realized that it was going to do such damage to your psyche, believe me I would not have done that.

--> Opinions vary. My belief is that i have damaged your psyche by refusing to be bullied by you and your surrogates.

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:And all this because he did not like my posts on Diggy Raja.
No. I did that because I did not like the arguments you used to defend Diggy Raja. I was critiquing your craptacular illogic, and that had little to do with Diggy.

i would have had no problem at all if you would have confined your criticism to my views of Diggy Raja. By coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and then using it again and again in your posts you were propagating that ALL my views should be ridiculed and disbelieved. This undermined your own credibility because you had praised my philosophy and history posts on Sulekha for several years.

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:02 pm

charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed.
Where did I say that? I readily agree with some things you say.

When you coined the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaged it, and kept using it again and again in your posts it is very evident what you were trying to propagate. You had no problem at all with the 'Rashmun Method'--which you disparaged and kept using again and again in your posts--when it was used to analyze history and philosophy on Sulekha for several years.

And all because you did not like my posts on Diggy Raja.

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:04 pm

Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:this tactic of digging up past posts to discredit another poster is something the Akka has eagerly embraced. He has used it on quite a few occasions against me, but then had to stop because of this:

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164p50-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33954
Whenever you lie about the past -- as you have taken to doing rather often -- I will be happy to prove it to you with your own past posts. If your past posts discredit you, that's your problem not mine.

the question was not about lying

I dug up the old post to expose your duplicity on the matter of reservations, speaking from both sides of your mouth.

https://such.forumotion.com/t4164-pandit-nehru-was-against-caste-based-reservations#33861

by Guest Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:09 pm

the two of you, don't even see where you are and get all guththam guththa.

This thread is on me, but looks like it's still about CARU. Rolling Eyes

by charvaka Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:09 pm

Rashmun wrote:
charvaka wrote:
Rashmun wrote:i will say one more thing. i would have had no issues with Charvaka if he would have criticized me about anything i said. i did have a problem when he tried to paint me in a black and white fashion by coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and using it again and again in his posts to propagate that everything i say must be disbelieved and ridiculed.
I apologize sincerely for hurting you so deeply. Had I realized that it was going to do such damage to your psyche, believe me I would not have done that.

--> Opinions vary. My belief is that i have damaged your psyche by refusing to be bullied by you and your surrogates.

Hint: I am not the one whining constantly about what name you coined for me or how you tried to disparage or discredit me.

Rashmun wrote:By coining the phrase 'Rashmun Method', disparaging it, and then using it again and again in your posts you were propagating that ALL my views should be ridiculed and disbelieved.

No. I was critiquing the methods you used in some of your arguments. That does not imply that ALL your views should be ridiculed. I clearly explained what I meant by Rashmun Method; look up those threads if you forgot.

by Sponsored content