Gems we are missing from Sulekha

by Mosquito Mon May 16, 2011 2:44 pm

From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799

From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803

by CroMagnon Mon May 16, 2011 2:56 pm

Sandilya hypothesizes what Hawking will say about sex and romance and Maria pronounces judgement on him based on Sandilya's assumptions.

Morons!

PseudoIntellectual wrote:Gems we are missing from Sulekha

No wonder you find Jerry Springer entertaining too!

by Rekz Mon May 16, 2011 3:21 pm

Gems as in...Ginger eating monkeys????? Question

by Guest Mon May 16, 2011 3:53 pm

PI - are you feeling ok about this? As your well wisher, just making sure you are ok...

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/are-you-serious-of-course-not-1116827.htm#1116827

by CroMagnon Mon May 16, 2011 4:12 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:PI - are you feeling ok about this? As your well wisher, just making sure you are ok...

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/are-you-serious-of-course-not-1116827.htm#1116827

Maria, like any politician, has successfully made many such u-turns. She first panders to all and sundry and when cornered she comes out saying it was all a joke (remember that thread about a 100+ man marrying a 17 yr. old?).

by ashaNirasha Mon May 16, 2011 4:36 pm

We need a sticky for Maria on this forum.

She is the new Muthukumar of old CH. She's taken it over completely.

by CroMagnon Mon May 16, 2011 4:41 pm

ashaNirasha wrote:We need a sticky for Maria on this forum.

There have been more topics about Queer Bee - why this preferential treatment to M?

by ashaNirasha Mon May 16, 2011 4:49 pm

Because I think M is way more popular than the other. And then, there's the issue of guaranteed response, one way or the other.

by CroMagnon Mon May 16, 2011 4:53 pm

ashaNirasha wrote:Because I think M is way more popular than the other. And then, there's the issue of guaranteed response, one way or the other.

I think you are underestimating the notoriety of Queer Bee. But I agree, Maria's sticky will generate more traffic in the long run since nobody on this forum disagrees about the former.

by Guest Mon May 16, 2011 4:58 pm

i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**

oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead Very Happy

by Hellsangel Mon May 16, 2011 5:15 pm

PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.

by Nila Mon May 16, 2011 5:33 pm

Who is hawking?

by Hellsangel Mon May 16, 2011 5:35 pm

Sasthi wrote:Who is hawking?

No one. We posted a sign outside that said "Strictly no soliciting".

by Propagandhi711 Mon May 16, 2011 6:35 pm

PI, your posts are also gems in the same vein.

by Mosquito Mon May 16, 2011 7:17 pm

Hellsangel wrote:PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.

Worth mocking=important.

by Mosquito Mon May 16, 2011 7:18 pm

Propagandhi711 wrote:PI, your posts are also gems in the same vein.

But mine pale in comparison to your posts of sexual fantasies.

by Hellsangel Mon May 16, 2011 8:09 pm

PseudoIntellectual wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:PI, what you are doing is simply accentuating the self-importance of the very people you like to mock.

Worth mocking=important.

Are you saying that the people you mock are important?

by Propagandhi711 Mon May 16, 2011 8:46 pm

yeah well, mine actually say something.

by Guest Mon May 16, 2011 9:50 pm

seven wrote:i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**

oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead

i thought sambarvada was sara boji. no?

by charvaka Mon May 16, 2011 9:57 pm

nutmeg wrote:
seven wrote:i am convinced no more people will be joining us here from old CH. not maria not kripa or sara boji qb ts. this is just not the same without them. i am losing interest fast **sigh**

oh maybe tineka and andrea when they come back to find sulekha CH dead

i thought sambarvada was sara boji. no?

I think so. I don't think Brahma made two of those.

by Guest Mon May 16, 2011 11:57 pm

PseudoIntellectual wrote:From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799

From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803

Seems like they are playing "Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest" game on Sulekha CH. The retraction was hilarious.

Who needs Deepak Chopra when there is Sulekha CH!

by charvaka Tue May 17, 2011 12:10 am

PseudoIntellectual wrote:From Sandilya
He will rationally announce that sex is a mechanical event and all the emotional hype on romance is mental weakness: http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/no-heaven-no-afterlife-says-stephen-hawking-106120

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/hawking-joins-carvakavaka-forum-1116783.htm#1116799

From Maria
Apparently our comments were so fabulous in Sandilya's thread...someone had to erase it! One more time...I would rather listen to 5 (made it 5 this time) mins of Chopra than 2 mins of Hawking...if Deepak ever says sex is just a mechanical event..he would be downgraded to Hawking's 2 mins. M

http://forums.sulekha.com/forums/coffeehouse/chopra-and-hawking-1116803.htm#1116803

This is classic guruvu-gaaru. He imagined the sex comment when Hawking made none. And Maria painstakingly commented twice assuming Hawking had made such a comment and even speculating what she would do if Deepak Chopra makes such a comment -- both times jokingly of course! This is CH comedy gold.

by Guest Tue May 17, 2011 6:54 am

*deleted -- irrelevant content*

by Another Brick Tue May 17, 2011 7:11 am

nothing more frustrating than to see a person replacing his original post with "deleted". you know there was a post made that you could have read, but now you cannot. agony X 10. it is much easier on the readers when one actually deletes a post.

by Guest Tue May 17, 2011 7:23 am

i will avoid "deleting" for i agree with you. in my post i had given options to seven, viz. other sites she could consider if she was looking for a change. seven expresses disenchantment above. later (within ten mins.), i realized that my post could be read as being unnecessarily hostile.

by Sponsored content

Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha

Re: Gems we are missing from Sulekha