Has Panini Press started abusing his Admin powers again?

Rashmun wrote:I notice that Panini Press has now edited JM's post once again and given what he claims is a second warning to JM. My claim is that Hellsangel has violated privacy policies of other posters on numerous occasions and after repeated protests PP only gave him one warning, only because he happens to be a buddy of PP.

HA was shameless enough to use JM's name in his signature today, and yet PP did not see it fit to give HA a warning.

In all fairness PP should have removed JM's purported name from JM's post when PP removed his own name from JM's post. The reason is that JM was only quoting what HA had been using as a signature in his (HA's) post.

I am saddened to see the borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:I notice that Panini Press has now edited JM's post once again and given what he claims is a second warning to JM. My claim is that Hellsangel has violated privacy policies of other posters on numerous occasions and after repeated protests PP only gave him one warning, only because he happens to be a buddy of PP.

HA was shameless enough to use JM's name in his signature today, and yet PP did not see it fit to give HA a warning.

In all fairness PP should have removed JM's purported name from JM's post when PP removed his own name from JM's post. The reason is that JM was only quoting what HA had been using as a signature in his (HA's) post.

I am saddened to see the borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP.

...here is what I have to say...

Rashmun wrote:

I am afraid whenever HA will provoke JM by using JM's name, JM will retaliate by using PP's name, and then PP will step in and invoke his Admin powers and indirectly do all he can to undermine JM while slyly winking at HA's antics. (He may even try to ban JM and get everyone to accept this based on the fact that JM had been using his name.) In my opinion, this unscrupulous borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP needs to be exposed. I approve of JM's method of fighting with HA: whenever HA uses JM's name, JM has the right to use PP's name to hit back at HA. The whole world knows by now that HA and PP are joined at the hip.

Uppili wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

I am afraid whenever HA will provoke JM by using JM's name, JM will retaliate by using PP's name, and then PP will step in and invoke his Admin powers and indirectly do all he can to undermine JM while slyly winking at HA's antics. (He may even try to ban JM and get everyone to accept this based on the fact that JM had been using his name.) In my opinion, this unscrupulous borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP needs to be exposed. I approve of JM's method of fighting with HA: whenever HA uses JM's name, JM has the right to use PP's name to hit back at HA. The whole world knows by now that HA and PP are joined at the hip.

You can always post on http://Sulekha.forumotion.com

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:I notice that Panini Press has now edited JM's post once again and given what he claims is a second warning to JM. My claim is that Hellsangel has violated privacy policies of other posters on numerous occasions and after repeated protests PP only gave him one warning, only because he happens to be a buddy of PP.

HA was shameless enough to use JM's name in his signature today, and yet PP did not see it fit to give HA a warning.

In all fairness PP should have removed JM's purported name from JM's post when PP removed his own name from JM's post. The reason is that JM was only quoting what HA had been using as a signature in his (HA's) post.

I am saddened to see the borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP.

...here is what I have to say...

I am afraid whenever HA will provoke JM by using JM's name, JM will retaliate by using PP's name, and then PP will step in and invoke his Admin powers and indirectly do all he can to undermine JM while slyly winking at HA's antics. (He may even try to ban JM and get everyone to accept this based on the fact that JM had been using his name.) In my opinion, this unscrupulous borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP needs to be exposed. I approve of JM's method of fighting with HA: whenever HA uses JM's name, JM has the right to use PP's name to hit back at HA. The whole world knows by now that HA and PP are joined at the hip.

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Rashmun wrote:I notice that Panini Press has now edited JM's post once again and given what he claims is a second warning to JM. My claim is that Hellsangel has violated privacy policies of other posters on numerous occasions and after repeated protests PP only gave him one warning, only because he happens to be a buddy of PP.

HA was shameless enough to use JM's name in his signature today, and yet PP did not see it fit to give HA a warning.

In all fairness PP should have removed JM's purported name from JM's post when PP removed his own name from JM's post. The reason is that JM was only quoting what HA had been using as a signature in his (HA's) post.

I am saddened to see the borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP.

...here is what I have to say...

I am afraid whenever HA will provoke JM by using JM's name, JM will retaliate by using PP's name, and then PP will step in and invoke his Admin powers and indirectly do all he can to undermine JM while slyly winking at HA's antics. (He may even try to ban JM and get everyone to accept this based on the fact that JM had been using his name.) In my opinion, this unscrupulous borderline criminal behavior of HA and PP needs to be exposed. I approve of JM's method of fighting with HA: whenever HA uses JM's name, JM has the right to use PP's name to hit back at HA. The whole world knows by now that HA and PP are joined at the hip.

As predicted by me, the whole game played out once again. HA provokes JM by using his purported name, JM hits back by using PP's purported name, PP puts on his Admin hat and deletes his name in the thread, but not JM's name. As always, another warning was given to JM, while no warning whatsoever was given to HA--who started this whole game-- presumably because HA and PP, as the whole world knows by now, are joined at the hip.

Rashmun wrote:I am afraid whenever HA will provoke JM by using JM's name, JM will retaliate by using PP's name