Wikipedia Wars
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Wikipedia Wars
A behind-the-scenes look at the so-called edit wars on Wikipedia has revealed the topics people argue about the most across the globe. The winners: religion and politics.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
Hellsangel- Posts : 14721
Join date : 2011-04-28
Re: Wikipedia Wars
Hellsangel wrote:A behind-the-scenes look at the so-called edit wars on Wikipedia has revealed the topics people argue about the most across the globe. The winners: religion and politics.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
And I bet most are men - dealing with these worldly matters.
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Wikipedia Wars
read it.Hellsangel wrote:A behind-the-scenes look at the so-called edit wars on Wikipedia has revealed the topics people argue about the most across the globe. The winners: religion and politics.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
HA, i passed you information in trust. i trusted you would not be so blatant. it is neither your fault nor mine. we will be the way we are but i will henceforth be circumspect in passing info to you. never again. we will still be friends though if you still want me as your friend.
Guest- Guest
Re: Wikipedia Wars
Huzefa Kapasi wrote:HA, i passed you information in trust. i trusted you would not be so blatant. it is neither your fault nor mine. we will be the way we are but i will henceforth be circumspect in passing info to you. never again. we will still be friends though if you still want me as your friend.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Wikipedia Wars
hi GC. what's shaking?goodcitizn wrote:Huzefa Kapasi wrote:HA, i passed you information in trust. i trusted you would not be so blatant. it is neither your fault nor mine. we will be the way we are but i will henceforth be circumspect in passing info to you. never again. we will still be friends though if you still want me as your friend.
Guest- Guest
Re: Wikipedia Wars
*corrected* but henceforth i will be circumspect in passing info to you.Huzefa Kapasi wrote:but i will henceforth be circumspect in passing info to you.
Guest- Guest
Re: Wikipedia Wars
Huzefa Kapasi wrote:hi GC. what's shaking?goodcitizn wrote:Huzefa Kapasi wrote:HA, i passed you information in trust. i trusted you would not be so blatant. it is neither your fault nor mine. we will be the way we are but i will henceforth be circumspect in passing info to you. never again. we will still be friends though if you still want me as your friend.
Saw the mango post of yours that made me pine for some juicy pulp. My fav is malgova. Miss India during this season.
goodcitizn- Posts : 3263
Join date : 2011-05-03
Re: Wikipedia Wars
\Hellsangel wrote:A behind-the-scenes look at the so-called edit wars on Wikipedia has revealed the topics people argue about the most across the globe. The winners: religion and politics.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
I'm sure Rashmun is flagged and banned on Wikipedia's Akbar page for the number edits he may have made to the page. Same for Nawab of Arcot and Mughals pages.
southindian- Posts : 4643
Join date : 2012-10-08
Re: Wikipedia Wars
southindian wrote:\Hellsangel wrote:A behind-the-scenes look at the so-called edit wars on Wikipedia has revealed the topics people argue about the most across the globe. The winners: religion and politics.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/06/03/wikipedia-edit-wars-most-hotly-contested/#ixzz2VLwRLQU8
I wonder how Akbar, Katju, etc. do on Wikipedia.
I'm sure Rashmun is flagged and banned on Wikipedia's Akbar page for the number edits he may have made to the page. Same for Nawab of Arcot and Mughals pages.
I dont trust the information.
What about Naarth-South; Tamil-Hindian; Tambrahmism - backward caste; Syrian Christians - Naboodiris; Tamil-Gult?
Marathadi-Saamiyaar- Posts : 17675
Join date : 2011-04-30
Age : 110
Re: Wikipedia Wars
Grandpa Jeremiah may be most active on this site and appears to be working hard on the site.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Thomas_Christians
Saint Thomas Christians derive status within the caste system from the tradition that they were elites, who were evangelized by St. Thomas.[129][134]
Internal division of Saint Thomas Christians into Northists and Southists and also into a number of sects based on the ecclesiastical orientation makes the pattern of segmentation an exceedingly complex one.[132] Fuller believes that the caste hierarchy among these Christian groupings in Kerala is more polarized than the Hindu system of gradation and ascribes this relatively high polar nature to the limited number of castes among Christians while innumerable castes and sub castes are arranged in the Hindu hierarchical order.[129] Forrester suggests that the Northist-Southist division forms two groups within the Saint Thomas Christian community which are closely analogous to sub-castes.[132] At the same time, different Saint Thomas Christian denominations like Catholic, Jacobite, Mar Thomite, etc. are better regarded as sects, rather than sub-castes, since the recruitment to these sects cannot be strictly ascribed to birth.[129][132] Also, internal mobility is allowed among these Saint Thomas Christian sects and the caste status is kept even if the sect allegiance is switched (for example, from Syrian Orthodox to Syrian Catholic).[135] That is, despite the sectarian differences, Saint Thomas Christians share a common social status within the Caste system of Kerala and is considered as Forward Caste.[132
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Thomas_Christians
Saint Thomas Christians derive status within the caste system from the tradition that they were elites, who were evangelized by St. Thomas.[129][134]
Internal division of Saint Thomas Christians into Northists and Southists and also into a number of sects based on the ecclesiastical orientation makes the pattern of segmentation an exceedingly complex one.[132] Fuller believes that the caste hierarchy among these Christian groupings in Kerala is more polarized than the Hindu system of gradation and ascribes this relatively high polar nature to the limited number of castes among Christians while innumerable castes and sub castes are arranged in the Hindu hierarchical order.[129] Forrester suggests that the Northist-Southist division forms two groups within the Saint Thomas Christian community which are closely analogous to sub-castes.[132] At the same time, different Saint Thomas Christian denominations like Catholic, Jacobite, Mar Thomite, etc. are better regarded as sects, rather than sub-castes, since the recruitment to these sects cannot be strictly ascribed to birth.[129][132] Also, internal mobility is allowed among these Saint Thomas Christian sects and the caste status is kept even if the sect allegiance is switched (for example, from Syrian Orthodox to Syrian Catholic).[135] That is, despite the sectarian differences, Saint Thomas Christians share a common social status within the Caste system of Kerala and is considered as Forward Caste.[132
southindian- Posts : 4643
Join date : 2012-10-08
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum