What the Liberal media ignores

confuzzled dude wrote:How many of them claimed SYG and have gotten away.

goodcitizn wrote:Thanks for posting this link. I seldom watch Fox News because if they get any farther right they'd be swimming in the Atlantic ocean. Let me give you my take on this.
 
1. Why talk about a majority of gun-related deaths last year being from blacks on blacks when they are primarily due to gang wars and drug deals in major metros like Chicago, LA etc? The Zimmerman case has zero to do with gangs or drugs.

They did talk of the fact that no one talks about gang violence as much as they talk about gun violence.
 
2. Why bring up OJ Simpson's verdict of not guilty to compare against this verdict? The cases are completely different. Besides two wrongs don't cancel each other off.
 They were talking about the justice system. They were pointing out that in one case the same people who said the system worked are now saying the system failed.


3. They are accusing blacks alone for rallying behind the Martin family. There are whites and others, including me, who think that Zimmerman got off scot free. Some legal loopholes have to fixed on what self-defense really is because I, for one, don't believe Trayon's death can be justified on that defense.
 They are not.

If Fox News wants to accuse anyone they should accuse the media, of which they are very much a part, for polarizing this into a race rally, not the White House, Obama or the liberals. Of course, they are far too right in politics for any sensible introspection.

They are accusing the liberal media, you know, the MSNBC types.

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:
1. Why talk about a majority of gun-related deaths last year being from blacks on blacks when they are primarily due to gang wars and drug deals in major metros like Chicago, LA etc? The Zimmerman case has zero to do with gangs or drugs.

They did talk of the fact that no one talks about gang violence as much as they talk about gun violence.
 

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:
1. Why talk about a majority of gun-related deaths last year being from blacks on blacks when they are primarily due to gang wars and drug deals in major metros like Chicago, LA etc? The Zimmerman case has zero to do with gangs or drugs.

They did talk of the fact that no one talks about gang violence as much as they talk about gun violence.
 

Diversion tactics. What's their choice of weapon? knife, sword or nunchaku?

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:
1. Why talk about a majority of gun-related deaths last year being from blacks on blacks when they are primarily due to gang wars and drug deals in major metros like Chicago, LA etc? The Zimmerman case has zero to do with gangs or drugs.

They did talk of the fact that no one talks about gang violence as much as they talk about gun violence.
 

Diversion tactics. What's their choice of weapon? knife, sword or nunchaku?

You are not going to believe that there is so much more to gang violence including knifings and beatings coz WaPo does not report on them.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

goodcitizn wrote:
1. Why talk about a majority of gun-related deaths last year being from blacks on blacks when they are primarily due to gang wars and drug deals in major metros like Chicago, LA etc? The Zimmerman case has zero to do with gangs or drugs.

They did talk of the fact that no one talks about gang violence as much as they talk about gun violence.
 

Diversion tactics. What's their choice of weapon? knife, sword or nunchaku?

You are not going to believe that there is so much more to gang violence including knifings and beatings coz WaPo does not report on them.

Yeah Yeah! I must be missing a lot of valuable & sane information disseminated by Limbaughs & Hannitys of the world. Did you ever venture to L.A Downtown or South East DC?