Futuristic view of Laws affecting religious practice in another 20-30 Years

Allegedly, these laws could be made, first applicable to
" Assam, West Bengal, Kerala, J&K, UP & Bihar"

In the second wave it could be made applicable to states 
 Bombay, Delhi, Telengana, Seemandhra and possibly TN
 

The article referred to below, discusses laws in Malaysia that favors Muslims. 

But it also possibly portends, the  shape of things to come in India, if Indian Muslims, Media & Political Class do not educate people about the dangers of Political Islam and fight political Islam.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/192853.pdf

Highlights are given below. The deleted/edited words in Green color indicate what could happen if similar rules are applied in India.

a) The government maintains a dual legal system, whereby Sharia courts rule 
on religious, family, and some criminal issues involving Muslims and secular
courts rule on other issues pertaining to both Muslims and the broader population. 
Government policies promoted Islam above other religions.

b) the secular civil and criminal 
court system has gradually ceded jurisdictional control to Sharia courts, 
particularly in areas of family law involving disputes between Muslims and non Muslims.

c) Religious minorities continued to face limitations on religious 
expression, including restrictions on the purchase and use of real property.

d) Civil courts generally ceded authority to Sharia courts in cases concerning conversion from Islam, and the latter remained reluctant to allow such conversions. 

e) several reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious 
affiliation, belief, or practice

f) ” but it also gives state and federal governments the power to “control 
or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons 
professing the religion of Islam

g) The constitution provides that federal law has precedence over 
state law but also provides that issues of Islamic law are state, rather than federal, 
matters.

h) Authorities at the state level administer Sharia laws through Islamic courts and 
have jurisdiction over all Muslims. Sharia laws and the degree of their 
enforcement vary by state.

i) Muslims who deviate from accepted Sunni Islamic principles and subject them to 
mandatory “rehabilitation” in centers that teach and enforce government-approved 
Islamic practices.

j) Nationally, Muslims who seek to convert to another religion must first obtain 
approval from a Sharia court to declare themselves “apostates.” This effectively 
prohibits the conversion of Muslims, since Sharia courts seldom grant such 
requests and can impose penalties (such as enforced “rehabilitation”) on apostates

k) The government provides financial support to Islamic religious institutions, 
including private Muslim schools that teach a government-approved curriculum 
and allow government supervision, and more limited funding to non-Islamic 
communities

l) The government strictly prohibits religious groups from proselytizing Muslims, 
although proselytizing non-Muslims is allowed.

m) Minority(Non-muslim) religions were generally free to practice their beliefs, but 
sometimes faced limits on religious expression, including on the use of real 
property

o) Some non-Muslim places of worship were subject to relocation or 
demolition,

p) National identity cards identify Muslims as such on the card’s surface, but for 
members of other recognized religions, their religious affiliation is encrypted in a 
smart chip within the identity cards and not printed. There have been complaints 
of errors in the designation of religions in the chips. Muslims must also carry a 
special photo identification of themselves and their spouses as proof of marriage. 
The government uses these cards to determine which citizens are subject to Sharia
law

and so on..