Re: what was it that attracted you to him/her when it did?

by Another Brick Fri Jul 01, 2011 5:42 am

Merlot Daruwala wrote:Sylvia Nanavati comes across across as quite chalu. Here's a gripping, tabloidy account of the saga based on court records:

chalu indeed. wonder why she would be so mad for some sausage when, going by the account of many, her beauty could have easily snared many pigs.

btw, a poster on rediff has asked the right question - how come manu sharma's act was considered a murder when this isn't? he was refused a drink, and he was mad. he shot. culpable homicide not amounting to murder. not at all pre-meditated. case closed.

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:03 am

Another Brick wrote:what attracted me to her when i first met her was her color (i AM a shallow person, all right) and her bubbly nature. we hit it out in our very first meeting and i must say i liked her company very much. then i met with her after a week and liked her even better. i kept meeting her every saturday night and then i not unnaturally fell in love with her. i love beer.

yeah, the moment I read bubbly I knew you are talking about b and not w. It's almost cruel how you forget w in all of your stories.

by Another Brick Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:15 am

well, i forgot to tell you all that i have started seeing w frequently now. it is either whyte and mackay or black dog with soda.

speaking of dog, i just heard someone refer to digvijay singh as dogvijay singh. hahaha. i will use that name regularly on CH now.

by charvaka Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:36 pm

Another Brick wrote:yeah, that verdict is baffling - not amounting to murder! and maria were all smiles for the shutterbugs yesterday. this after the court convicting her of cutting grover's body into pieces to destroy the evidence. if this is not kaliyug then i don't know what is. a full report will follow from sara boji's desk in a few.

I don't know how the guy's actions do not amount to murder. I can understand how destruction of evidence after the murder has already been committed is not quite the same level of crime as killing a man in cold blood... but still this is one of the weirder cases that make their way through our courts.

by charvaka Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:36 pm

Another Brick wrote:speaking of dog, i just heard someone refer to digvijay singh as dogvijay singh. hahaha. i will use that name regularly on CH now.

If we had Nariga on here, he would have used that on day one.

by garam_kuta Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:44 pm

charvaka wrote:
Another Brick wrote:speaking of dog, i just heard someone refer to digvijay singh as dogvijay singh. hahaha. i will use that name regularly on CH now.
If we had Nariga on here, he would have used that on day one.

soon SPCA will call you affraid

by charvaka Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:17 pm

So, the following people have told their stories here... TW, TAZ, HK, DM, Tapori, Charvaka, AB, Seven. How about all the other nallavars?

by Rekz Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:07 pm

Here i go - There was no fireworks at our first meeting...it was just a casual date..he was just another guy who flirts,drinks & smokes...attraction happened haue haule...day by day when i started to know him better...i realized we agreed most of time than we argued...it was rare in my case...so i decided to pay more attention to him...in the few months i dated him..i discovered he was damn good cook & a loving host...and completely in love with the moody,grumpy,egoistic & stupid me...as beloved TS quotes only true love got the potential to kill ego Smile

...im glad that i surrendered to our love.

As dink couples we hardly had any major disagreements...Just when i thought we would happily live holding hands,watching sunsets & sipping coffee...Life took a U turn...now we argue & fight often...Im neglected not only by hubby but also by my mom & dad...entry of this cute girl changed it all...best part is she don't even have teeth...what to say *sigh*she took my beauty sleep & hubby away...i don't remm when was the last time i slept full 8hrs but the second para is totally irrelevant to this topic..so i shall stop here..

Next bakra pls continue....

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:15 pm

Rekz wrote:Here i go - There was no fireworks at our first meeting...it was just a casual date..he was just another guy who flirts,drinks & smokes...attraction happened haue haule...day by day when i started to know him better...i realized we agreed most of time than we argued...it was rare in my case...so i decided to pay more attention to him...in the few months i dated him..i discovered he was damn good cook & a loving host...and completely in love with the moody,grumpy,egoistic & stupid me...as beloved TS quotes only true love got the potential to kill ego ...im glad that i surrendered to our love.

As dink couples we hardly had any major disagreements...Just when i thought we would happily live holding hands,watching sunsets & sipping coffee...Life took a U turn...now we argue & fight often...Im neglected not only by hubby but also by my mom & dad...entry of this cute girl changed it all...best part is she don't even have teeth...what to say *sigh*she took my beauty sleep & hubby away...i don't remm when was the last time i slept full 8hrs but the second para is totally irrelevant to this topic..so i shall stop here..

Next bakra pls continue....

cute... does he still flirt, drink and smoke?

by Rekz Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:21 pm

Thanks tracy

Flirt-occationally
drink-ditto
smoke-just 2 sticks per day Smile

by Rekz Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:28 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
Another Brick wrote:what attracted me to her when i first met her was her color (i AM a shallow person, all right) and her bubbly nature. we hit it out in our very first meeting and i must say i liked her company very much. then i met with her after a week and liked her even better. i kept meeting her every saturday night and then i not unnaturally fell in love with her. i love beer.

yeah, the moment I read bubbly I knew you are talking about b and not w. It's almost cruel how you forget w in all of your stories.

This is one thing i really like about men...ask them about one night stands..they can write couple of blogs on it...but even on anonymous forum...they underplay their true love stories..or wife stories...Men too are sentimental fools Cool

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:18 pm

One-night-stand stories has been missing on this forum actually. guess none since bittu left. Not sure if I am missing them or am just plain relieved.

by Hellsangel Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:20 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:One-night-stand stories has been missing on this forum actually. guess none since bittu left. Not sure if I am missing them or am just plain relieved.

Someone mentioned gentlemen on another thread. Gentlemen do not kiss and tell.

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:23 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:One-night-stand stories has been missing on this forum actually. guess none since bittu left. Not sure if I am missing them or am just plain relieved.
Someone mentioned gentlemen on another thread. Gentlemen do not kiss and tell.

but they do kiss, that's the whole point. Evil or Very Mad

by Hellsangel Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:24 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:One-night-stand stories has been missing on this forum actually. guess none since bittu left. Not sure if I am missing them or am just plain relieved.
Someone mentioned gentlemen on another thread. Gentlemen do not kiss and tell.

but they do kiss, that's the whole point.

No. You are missing the point. They do NOT tell.

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:29 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:
Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:One-night-stand stories has been missing on this forum actually. guess none since bittu left. Not sure if I am missing them or am just plain relieved.
Someone mentioned gentlemen on another thread. Gentlemen do not kiss and tell.

but they do kiss, that's the whole point.
No. You are missing the point. They do NOT tell.

But they KISS when they are not supposed to... (talking about one night stands here, not legit affairs).

by Hellsangel Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:31 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:

But they KISS when they are not supposed to... (talking about one night stands here, not legit affairs).

So it is ok to kiss in legit affairs but not otherwise?

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:35 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:

But they KISS when they are not supposed to... (talking about one night stands here, not legit affairs).
So it is ok to kiss in legit affairs but not otherwise?

ya.. marriage, engagement, affair, dating when single but with the purpose of finding someone (ok this is the only gray area here), professional help.

by Hellsangel Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:38 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:

ya.. marriage, engagement, affair, dating when single but with the purpose of finding someone (ok this is the only gray area here), professional help.

??

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 4:46 pm

Hellsangel wrote:
Tracy Whitney wrote:

ya.. marriage, engagement, affair, dating when single but with the purpose of finding someone (ok this is the only gray area here), professional help.

??

like escort services. edit: wait this was to be in my NOT list... i was preparing two lists before... jeez.. I need to get out of here.

by Guest Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:24 pm

Another Brick wrote:

btw, a poster on rediff has asked the right question - how come manu sharma's act was considered a murder when this isn't? he was refused a drink, and he was mad. he shot. culpable homicide not amounting to murder. not at all pre-meditated. case closed.

How is killing an innocent woman who refused to give a drink equate to killing a betraying friend who lured the lonely wife and slept with her?

Nanavati is da man! Don't compare him with the crook manu sharma.

by Hellsangel Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:14 am

kinnera wrote:
How is killing an innocent woman who refused to give a drink equate to killing a betraying friend who lured the lonely wife and slept with her?

Nanavati is da man! Don't compare him with the crook manu sharma.

And the wife is innocent in all this? Couldn't Nanavati be da man and simply divorce his wife?

by Merlot Daruwala Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:17 am

kinnera wrote:
Another Brick wrote:

btw, a poster on rediff has asked the right question - how come manu sharma's act was considered a murder when this isn't? he was refused a drink, and he was mad. he shot. culpable homicide not amounting to murder. not at all pre-meditated. case closed.

How is killing an innocent woman who refused to give a drink equate to killing a betraying friend who lured the lonely wife and slept with her?

The difference between murder and culpable homicide is the existence of motive. Killing someone with a motive and pre-meditation is considered a viler crime under law than doing so on the spur of the moment under a momentary rage. By that standard, I agree with the Rediff poster. Manu Sharma may be a spoilt boor who deserved what he got, but viewed objectively, he didn't even know Jessica Lal for the killing to be considered murder. I believe the court was influenced by the public outrage over the prior acquital and therefore swung to the other extreme.

by Another Brick Mon Jul 04, 2011 2:23 am

Merlot Daruwala wrote:Manu Sharma may be a spoilt boor who deserved what he got, but viewed objectively, he didn't even know Jessica Lal for the killing to be considered murder. I believe the court was influenced by the public outrage over the prior acquital and therefore swung to the other extreme.

yes, i read more about what amounts to murder and what does not and I am convinced that manu sharma is plain unlucky. he wasn't there to murder her. he was there for booze. and she refused. he shot because he was angry. it wasn't pre-medidated at all and hence not a murder. no matter whose story you read, it is certain that he did not intend to kill her.

the prosecution failed to prove that maria and jerome wanted to murder grover. but in manu sharma's case, i wonder how prosecution convinced both high and supreme court that it was a murder. yes, public pressure got to both the courts and he was hard done. had he not been a minister's son, he would have got 10. i think all the courts erred in his case - sessions court, high court and supreme court.

by pravalika Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:15 am

Another Brick wrote:
Merlot Daruwala wrote:Manu Sharma may be a spoilt boor who deserved what he got, but viewed objectively, he didn't even know Jessica Lal for the killing to be considered murder. I believe the court was influenced by the public outrage over the prior acquital and therefore swung to the other extreme.

yes, i read more about what amounts to murder and what does not and I am convinced that manu sharma is plain unlucky. he wasn't there to murder her. he was there for booze. and she refused. he shot because he was angry. it wasn't pre-medidated at all and hence not a murder. no matter whose story you read, it is certain that he did not intend to kill her.

the prosecution failed to prove that maria and jerome wanted to murder grover. but in manu sharma's case, i wonder how prosecution convinced both high and supreme court that it was a murder. yes, public pressure got to both the courts and he was hard done. had he not been a minister's son, he would have got 10. i think all the courts erred in his case - sessions court, high court and supreme court.

wow, that's very sad, if a guy asks me for booze, i'm gonna get it for him. i hope indian women are taking home the right message from this.

by Guest Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:39 pm

pravalika wrote:wow, that's very sad, if a guy asks me for booze, i'm gonna get it for him. i hope indian women are taking home the right message from this.

by pravalika Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:44 pm

Tracy Whitney wrote:
pravalika wrote:wow, that's very sad, if a guy asks me for booze, i'm gonna get it for him. i hope indian women are taking home the right message from this.

i hope the indian women realize that the court ruling in favor of the now-dead lal woman is an exception.

by Guest Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:50 pm

Jessica lal was a guest bartender serving alcohol in a private party. The bar was closed and there was no alcohol left. When she and her friend told this to Manu Sharma, he got mad and shot her.

yes, it was a homicide, not murder. And had he not been acquited earlier, maybe the final judgement would not have been so harsh on him.

What does Indian women gotta learn from this? And what do you mean by 'if a guy asks me for booze, i'm gonna get it for him'? Makes me think you have no idea what happened in jessica lal case.....

by pravalika Mon Jul 04, 2011 12:53 pm

i know more about the jessica lal case that she does.

please go shopping for yourself.

by Sponsored content