Paging Rashmun

by b_A Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:43 pm

Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

by garam_kuta Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:50 pm

as long as you stick to GK as me, I suppose! Wink

by garam_kuta Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:15 pm

before christmas, please Basketball

by bw Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:23 pm

b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

by b_A Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:34 pm

garam_kuta wrote:as long as you stick to GK as me, I suppose!

Still forgetting to change handles , I see.

by b_A Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:37 pm

bw wrote:
b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

by bw Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:41 pm

b_A wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

by b_A Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:08 pm

bw wrote:
b_A wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

Shhhh. He already made a note that both of our names start with lower case b. He is very close to making the next proclamation.

by garam_kuta Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:22 pm

bw wrote:
b_A wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia? Razz

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me? rofl

by b_A Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:31 pm

garam_kuta wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:Why are you MIA ? I am missing my daily dose of fun. What is your latest theory regarding my alternate handle?
Still sticking to ashdoc ?

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia?

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me?

Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

by garam_kuta Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:41 pm

b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:
bw wrote:

haha@b_A= ashdoc.

even inspector closeau will not make such a bad deduction.

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia?

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me?
Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

hmm...boy...finally xanax seems to be working for you today clap

must have OD it;)

by b_A Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:29 pm

garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
bw wrote:
b_A wrote:

We don't need any deductions that tax the brain here considering the fragile state of their (Rashmun+GK) mind. Just some random guess is all that is required.

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia?

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me?
Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

hmm...boy...finally xanax seems to be working for you today must have OD it;)

Or you continue to keep forgetting to take your medicines and change your handles appropriately.
Let me help you clear the confusion in your mind. I know it will be a herculean task when you are off your medicines , but let me try anyway.

I didn't establish that GK= GK . What I established was that GK=Petrichor. So you can stop rofl

and start

and

.

by garam_kuta Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:50 am

b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
bw wrote:

after all that build up, this is the result? bah!

clouseau doesn't seem all that inept after all.

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia?

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me?
Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

hmm...boy...finally xanax seems to be working for you today must have OD it;)
Or you continue to keep forgetting to take your medicines and change your handles appropriately.
Let me help you clear the confusion in your mind. I know it will be a herculean task when you are off your medicines , but let me try anyway.

I didn't establish that GK= GK . What I established was that GK=Petrichor. So you can stop and start and .

not a chance...we're having great fun needling you... there's so much to come, na? yes you have not established GK=GK..good luck with that... you can do it... and now
you established GK=Petrichor hmmmm ...escalating intrigue and as much as it is flattering, is anybody buying your bayesian inference except us which is so mbwahahaha rofl

by b_A Wed Feb 26, 2014 12:22 pm

garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:

HMSS conditioning and nostalgia?

..just random guess is all that is required. mbwahahha.. is that your version of bayesian stats? is that how you 'established' GK was me?
Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

hmm...boy...finally xanax seems to be working for you today must have OD it;)
Or you continue to keep forgetting to take your medicines and change your handles appropriately.
Let me help you clear the confusion in your mind. I know it will be a herculean task when you are off your medicines , but let me try anyway.

I didn't establish that GK= GK . What I established was that GK=Petrichor. So you can stop    and start       and   .

not a chance...we're having great fun needling you... there's so much to come, na? yes you have not established GK=GK..good luck with that... you can do it... and now
you established GK=Petrichor hmmmm ...escalating intrigue and as much as it is flattering, is anybody buying your bayesian inference except us which is so mbwahahaha

You are needling me and havng fun?
Let me spell it out for you. What you are having is not fun but d-e-l-u-s-i-o-n-s. No wonder you flock together with the other delusionary bird of the same feathers, the R-man.
If nobody is buying my inference then why is your original handle feeling so shy to make his regular appearances?

by garam_kuta Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:49 pm

b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
garam_kuta wrote:
b_A wrote:
Really? Now we need to establish that GK is GK ?

hmm...boy...finally xanax seems to be working for you today must have OD it;)
Or you continue to keep forgetting to take your medicines and change your handles appropriately.
Let me help you clear the confusion in your mind. I know it will be a herculean task when you are off your medicines , but let me try anyway.

I didn't establish that GK= GK . What I established was that GK=Petrichor. So you can stop    and start       and   .

not a chance...we're having great fun needling you... there's so much to come, na? yes you have not established GK=GK..good luck with that... you can do it... and now
you established GK=Petrichor hmmmm ...escalating intrigue and as much as it is flattering, is anybody buying your bayesian inference except us which is so mbwahahaha

You are needling me and havng fun?
Let me spell it out for you. What you are having is not fun but d-e-l-u-s-i-o-n-s. No wonder you flock together with the other delusionary bird of the same feathers, the R-man.
If nobody is buying my inference then why is your original handle feeling so shy to make his regular appearances?

ha ha ha... precisely...this is priceless..it's just for this and for the oh, so promising future entertainment, granite-head!

by Sponsored content

Paging Rashmun

Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun

Re: Paging Rashmun