Home
Publications
Search
Register
Log inThe Dangers of Loose Talk About Genetics
Page 1 of 1
The Dangers of Loose Talk About Genetics
by Rishi Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:03 am
n the study, published last year in the journal Learning and Individual Differences, psychologist Angelica Moè told a group of 201 high school students that they would be taking a test that measured how well they could mentally manipulate imagined objects. They were also told that males perform better than females on this exercise, known as the Mental Rotation Test. Such pre-test comments are a standard way of inducing what psychologists call “stereotype threat.” Research shows that when women or minorities are reminded before being evaluated that the group to which they belong commonly scores poorly, they themselves do worse than if they had received no such reminder. Anxiety about confirming the negative stereotype hampers their performance.
But Moè went a step further. She divided the students into four groups and offered each one a particular explanation for women’s comparative disadvantage. One group was told that the gap resulted from genetic differences between men and women. A second group was told that time limits were the problem: women could do as well as men on the test, but they were more affected by restrictions on the amount of time they could take to work on it. A third group was told that other people’s stereotypes were to blame, making women feel less able than they are. And a fourth group, acting as a control, was simply told again that men perform better on the task than women. Then all the groups took the test.
The results: When women were given an external reason for females’ poor performance—time limits or others’ stereotypes—they did better on the test. When they were given an internal reason—their own deficient genes—they did worse. But the study’s really striking finding was that men also did worse when told that genes were the cause of the gender gap.
http://anniemurphypaul.com/2013/12/the-dangers-of-loose-talk-about-genetics/#
But Moè went a step further. She divided the students into four groups and offered each one a particular explanation for women’s comparative disadvantage. One group was told that the gap resulted from genetic differences between men and women. A second group was told that time limits were the problem: women could do as well as men on the test, but they were more affected by restrictions on the amount of time they could take to work on it. A third group was told that other people’s stereotypes were to blame, making women feel less able than they are. And a fourth group, acting as a control, was simply told again that men perform better on the task than women. Then all the groups took the test.
The results: When women were given an external reason for females’ poor performance—time limits or others’ stereotypes—they did better on the test. When they were given an internal reason—their own deficient genes—they did worse. But the study’s really striking finding was that men also did worse when told that genes were the cause of the gender gap.
http://anniemurphypaul.com/2013/12/the-dangers-of-loose-talk-about-genetics/#
Rishi- Posts : 5129
Join date : 2011-09-02
Similar topics» Linguistics and genetics meet
» Roots of genetics and evolution during ancient times
» How Genetics is settling the Aryan Migration Debate
» The dangers of fighting in Siachen
» dangers of internet hookups
» Roots of genetics and evolution during ancient times
» How Genetics is settling the Aryan Migration Debate
» The dangers of fighting in Siachen
» dangers of internet hookups
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|