Why India’s Narendra Modi may not eat at the White House dinner

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:  Hindu fanatic is not the same as islamic terrorist.

Yeah. He's just as cretinous and filled with as much primitive hatred but simply lacks the physical courage to inflict violence like the latter and therefore limits himself to online vitriol and fantasized violence.

Agreed. All law abiding men and women across the world Chaddis *fixed* are timid eunuchs who suppress their innermost desire to inflict violence on others. Only people worthy of daruwala's tears (i.e. afzal guru)  are those jihadis who express themselves freely by beheading innocent powerless victims.

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Cd
get a grip man. it is sad to see your disintegration. get real medical help.

Asked about what that meant for his dinner with President Obama, Mr. Akbaruddin said: “The Indian government has conveyed the PM’s dietary preferences to the American hosts.”
Mr. Modi is expected to restrict himself to lime water during his interactions with President Obama and Vice-President Joe Biden, who will host a dinner and a lunch for him respectively.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/packed-agenda-for-modi-in-us/article6439095.ece?homepage=true&ref=relatedNews

-> Dang! looks like a lot of sick journalists in need of real medical help. TBT/SI/Propa/Uppili et al, any recommendations, don't give the reference of the docs you've got treatment from, they did pathetic job of fixing you all.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:  Hindu fanatic is not the same as islamic terrorist.

Yeah. He's just as cretinous and filled with as much primitive hatred but simply lacks the physical courage to inflict violence like the latter and therefore limits himself to online vitriol and fantasized violence.

Agreed. All law abiding men and women across the world Chaddis *fixed* are timid eunuchs who suppress their innermost desire to inflict violence on others. Only people worthy of daruwala's tears (i.e. afzal guru)  are those jihadis who express themselves freely by beheading innocent powerless victims.

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:  Hindu fanatic is not the same as islamic terrorist.

Yeah. He's just as cretinous and filled with as much primitive hatred but simply lacks the physical courage to inflict violence like the latter and therefore limits himself to online vitriol and fantasized violence.

Agreed. All law abiding men and women across the world Chaddis *fixed* are timid eunuchs who suppress their innermost desire to inflict violence on others. Only people worthy of daruwala's tears (i.e. afzal guru)  are those jihadis who express themselves freely by beheading innocent powerless victims.

note

y

daruwala
If that somehow makes you happy, have a happy day.

what will go into such folklore is your characterization of 'abhorring violence against people is an undesirable quality compared to mindless gory jihadi violence'.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

truthbetold wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Yeah. He's just as cretinous and filled with as much primitive hatred but simply lacks the physical courage to inflict violence like the latter and therefore limits himself to online vitriol and fantasized violence.

Agreed. All law abiding men and women across the world Chaddis *fixed* are timid eunuchs who suppress their innermost desire to inflict violence on others. Only people worthy of daruwala's tears (i.e. afzal guru)  are those jihadis who express themselves freely by beheading innocent powerless victims.

note

y

daruwala
If that somehow makes you happy, have a happy day.

what will go into such folklore is your characterization of 'abhorring violence against people is an undesirable quality compared to mindless gory jihadi violence'.

Sooth, don't elevate yourself and your ilk to Gandhian heights. Its not 'abhorring violence' but plain cowardice. The fear of consequences is the only thing that separates chaddis from jihadis.

Maria S wrote:There is a happy ending:

White House to ‘respectfully accommodate’ Modi’s navaratri fast

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/white-house-to-respectfully-accommodate-modis-navaratri-fast/article6441368.ece

*If I may, usually non-vegetarians like me..are sensitive and accomodate vegetarians, don't expect non-veg dishes when we are invited to homes of vegetarians..and try to do the best when we invite veg friends, make sure there are enough veg dishes, even separate the non-veg dishes and place them in a different tables.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Cd
get a grip man. it is sad to see your disintegration. get real medical help.

Asked about what that meant for his dinner with President Obama, Mr. Akbaruddin said: “The Indian government has conveyed the PM’s dietary preferences to the American hosts.”
Mr. Modi is expected to restrict himself to lime water during his interactions with President Obama and Vice-President Joe Biden, who will host a dinner and a lunch for him respectively.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/packed-agenda-for-modi-in-us/article6439095.ece?homepage=true&ref=relatedNews

-> Dang! looks like a lot of sick journalists in need of real medical help. TBT/SI/Propa/Uppili et al, any recommendations, don't give the reference of the docs you've got treatment from, they did pathetic job of fixing you all.

one of the hallmarks of a nutjob is he thinks everyone else is a nut too.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

truthbetold wrote:Cd
get a grip man. it is sad to see your disintegration. get real medical help.

Asked about what that meant for his dinner with President Obama, Mr. Akbaruddin said: “The Indian government has conveyed the PM’s dietary preferences to the American hosts.”
Mr. Modi is expected to restrict himself to lime water during his interactions with President Obama and Vice-President Joe Biden, who will host a dinner and a lunch for him respectively.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/packed-agenda-for-modi-in-us/article6439095.ece?homepage=true&ref=relatedNews

-> Dang! looks like a lot of sick journalists in need of real medical help. TBT/SI/Propa/Uppili et al, any recommendations, don't give the reference of the docs you've got treatment from, they did pathetic job of fixing you all.

one of the hallmarks of a nutjob is he thinks everyone else is a nut too.

Echhuneni Pachayya Chowdary, go back and take a look at all the posts in this thread to figure out whose posts resemble a nutcase's.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Modi, a devout Hindu, is observing the annual nine-day religious fast called Navratri, an auspicious period in the Hindu calendar that also marks the coming of autumn. No, this is not about dietary restrictions. For Modi, this is a strict no-food fast.

Fasting Hindus follow a fruit-only fast, or avoid meat, or get by with only one meal a day during this nine-day period. Some avoid onion, garlic and alcohol, as well. But Modi, who is a devotee of Hindu mother goddess Durga and a strict vegetarian and teetotaller, follows the strictest form of abstinence. Since the 1970s, he has observed water-only fasts.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/09/22/why-indias-narendra-modi-may-not-eat-at-the-white-house-dinner/
-> I think Obama should show his respect to his atidhi devo bhav by turning into a devout Hindu for that day

Mr. Modi arrives Friday in the middle of a strict nine-day religious fast, raising a delicate question for the White House: How do you host a dinner for a foreign leader who is forgoing food?
Such visits are meticulously choreographed, with months of planning and entire dossiers devoted to guests' dietary restrictions and religious beliefs. An extended fast is an unusual challenge, said Walter Scheib, a former longtime White House executive chef, who said he couldn't recall a similar situation.
Every leader "has different concerns, from the prosaic, such as I don't eat garlic, to this one—I don't eat," Mr. Scheib said. While he noted that the White House is adroit when it comes to etiquette, the arrangement at dinner has the potential to be slightly awkward. "It's very bad form to sit in front of fasting guests and eat heartily," he said. "It's just not polite."