shah jahan was a big ass

by Guest Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:04 am

tingu wrote:

Point 2 is obviously false. Point 4 is also, to the best of my knowledge, false.

by Guest Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:54 am

Rashmun wrote:
tingu wrote:

Point 2 is obviously false. Point 4 is also, to the best of my knowledge, false.

wikipedia says shah jahan was a big ass: http://tinyurl.com/kxe8w9j

by Propagandhi711 Wed Dec 03, 2014 5:34 am

all mughals had big asses. but they didnt get that way on their own: douchemun's ancestors used to massage fine oils onto their respective mughal contemporary's asses with great dedication and kiss them all over and otherwise take goooood loving care of the asses till they became big and round.

by Guest Wed Dec 03, 2014 7:04 am

Propagandhi711 wrote:all mughals had big asses. but they didnt get that way on their own: douchemun's ancestors used to massage fine oils onto their respective mughal contemporary's asses with great dedication and kiss them all over and otherwise take goooood loving care of the asses till they became big and round.

It was a case of sharing of responsibilities. My male ancestors would do this to mughal queens and their daughters; Propa's female ancestors would do this to mughal kings and their sons.

by Propagandhi711 Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:20 pm

Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:all mughals had big asses. but they didnt get that way on their own: douchemun's ancestors used to massage fine oils onto their respective mughal contemporary's asses with great dedication and kiss them all over and otherwise take goooood loving care of the asses till they became big and round.

It was a case of sharing of responsibilities. My male ancestors would do this to mughal queens and their daughters; Propa's female ancestors would do this to mughal kings and their sons.

douchemun, you're one prime stupe. the only men allowed to touch mughal bitches were eunuchs. are you stating here that your male ancestors were eunuchs? if so, then the next obvious question is about your real ancestry...

you dont do too well without wiki to copy your "research" from, do you?

by Guest Wed Dec 03, 2014 10:45 pm

Propagandhi711 wrote:
Rashmun wrote:
Propagandhi711 wrote:all mughals had big asses. but they didnt get that way on their own: douchemun's ancestors used to massage fine oils onto their respective mughal contemporary's asses with great dedication and kiss them all over and otherwise take goooood loving care of the asses till they became big and round.

It was a case of sharing of responsibilities. My male ancestors would do this to mughal queens and their daughters; Propa's female ancestors would do this to mughal kings and their sons.

douchemun, you're one prime stupe. the only men allowed to touch mughal bitches were eunuchs. are you stating here that your male ancestors were eunuchs? if so, then the next obvious question is about your real ancestry...

you dont do too well without wiki to copy your "research" from, do you?

My male ancestors were doctors. When they would visit the Mughal harem the queen they were treating could not be seen--only touched ( to feel the pulse, etc.)--since a curtain would prevent the doctor from seeing the patient. But since these queens were often sex starved ( since the Mughal king could not singlehandedly satisfy hundreds of women in his harem) they would often grab hold of the doctor's hand and clasp it to their bosom or bum or _. Often these Mughal queens would pretend to be sick just so that they could be touched in the right places by my male ancestors.

Now shall we talk about your female ancestors?

by Sponsored content

shah jahan was a big ass

shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass

Re: shah jahan was a big ass