Khobragade's Sikular behavior lands her in soup......

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

Kinnera wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

Ppl can get away with anything by playing the low-caste card? That's very cheap.

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

I think, there are more Brahmin CONmen.

So, you think Khobragade has done nothing wrong.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

I think, there are more Brahmin CONmen.

So, you think Khobragade has done nothing wrong.

http://www.immihelp.com/forum/showthread.php/91163-Dual-Citizenship-For-Indian-Children-below-18-Years

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

I think, there are more Brahmin CONmen.

So, you think Khobragade has done nothing wrong.

http://www.immihelp.com/forum/showthread.php/91163-Dual-Citizenship-For-Indian-Children-below-18-Years

Comrade, why do you defend Devyani K so much?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:Is this another case of Brahmin-Bania government imposing its will on a low-caste Hindu?

I think, there are more Brahmin CONmen.

So, you think Khobragade has done nothing wrong.

http://www.immihelp.com/forum/showthread.php/91163-Dual-Citizenship-For-Indian-Children-below-18-Years

Comrade, why do you defend Devyani K so much?

Criticizing her mindlessly would've been fine?

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
I think, there are more Brahmin CONmen.

So, you think Khobragade has done nothing wrong.

http://www.immihelp.com/forum/showthread.php/91163-Dual-Citizenship-For-Indian-Children-below-18-Years

Comrade, why do you defend Devyani K so much?

Criticizing her mindlessly would've been fine?

So she doesn't deserve any of it. She is a poor innocent victim. And any criticism of her is mindless?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

http://www.immihelp.com/forum/showthread.php/91163-Dual-Citizenship-For-Indian-Children-below-18-Years

Comrade, why do you defend Devyani K so much?

Criticizing her mindlessly would've been fine?

So she doesn't deserve any of it. She is a poor innocent victim. And any criticism of her is mindless?

In this context/case, I'm afraid Yes.

It was the second inquiry into Ms. Khobragade’s actions. An earlier one found that she had violated regulations by failing to inform the government that her children had been issued American passports, and she was penalized for that, the official said. Offenses on this scale could lead to an oral or written warning, and might affect future promotions, the official said.

confuzzled dude wrote:

It was the second inquiry into Ms. Khobragade’s actions. An earlier one found that she had violated regulations by failing to inform the government that her children had been issued American passports, and she was penalized for that, the official said. Offenses on this scale could lead to an oral or written warning, and might affect future promotions, the official said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/india-tires-of-diplomatic-rift-over-arrest.html?_r=0
That line says it all..

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

It was the second inquiry into Ms. Khobragade’s actions. An earlier one found that she had violated regulations by failing to inform the government that her children had been issued American passports, and she was penalized for that, the official said. Offenses on this scale could lead to an oral or written warning, and might affect future promotions, the official said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/india-tires-of-diplomatic-rift-over-arrest.html?_r=0
That line says it all..

What about the first line? What does it say?

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

It was the second inquiry into Ms. Khobragade’s actions. An earlier one found that she had violated regulations by failing to inform the government that her children had been issued American passports, and she was penalized for that, the official said. Offenses on this scale could lead to an oral or written warning, and might affect future promotions, the official said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/india-tires-of-diplomatic-rift-over-arrest.html?_r=0
That line says it all..

What about the first line? What does it say?

"Indian authorities have opened an inquiry into whether Ms. Khobragade violated internal regulations that bar ministry officials from making unapproved statements to the media that could affect bilateral relations, according to an Indian official, who spoke about the diplomatic matter on the condition of anonymity."

It says the above. Why is this [cock-sucking] govt. raking up a dead and resolved issue? that too, going against the stand taken by the previous govt.

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

It was the second inquiry into Ms. Khobragade’s actions. An earlier one found that she had violated regulations by failing to inform the government that her children had been issued American passports, and she was penalized for that, the official said. Offenses on this scale could lead to an oral or written warning, and might affect future promotions, the official said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/india-tires-of-diplomatic-rift-over-arrest.html?_r=0
That line says it all..

What about the first line? What does it say?

"Indian authorities have opened an inquiry into whether Ms. Khobragade violated internal regulations that bar ministry officials from making unapproved statements to the media that could affect bilateral relations, according to an Indian official, who spoke about the diplomatic matter on the condition of anonymity."

It says the above. Why is this [cock-sucking] govt. raking up a dead and resolved issue? that too, going against the stand taken by the previous govt.

Ah! That explains your contortions.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/world/asia/india-tires-of-diplomatic-rift-over-arrest.html?_r=0
That line says it all..

What about the first line? What does it say?

"Indian authorities have opened an inquiry into whether Ms. Khobragade violated internal regulations that bar ministry officials from making unapproved statements to the media that could affect bilateral relations, according to an Indian official, who spoke about the diplomatic matter on the condition of anonymity."

It says the above. Why is this [cock-sucking] govt. raking up a dead and resolved issue? that too, going against the stand taken by the previous govt.

Ah! That explains your contortions.

comrade is also upset at the noose slowly tightening around his corrupt nephew and some of the anger spilt over into this case.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

What about the first line? What does it say?

"Indian authorities have opened an inquiry into whether Ms. Khobragade violated internal regulations that bar ministry officials from making unapproved statements to the media that could affect bilateral relations, according to an Indian official, who spoke about the diplomatic matter on the condition of anonymity."

It says the above. Why is this [cock-sucking] govt. raking up a dead and resolved issue? that too, going against the stand taken by the previous govt.

Ah! That explains your contortions.

comrade is also upset at the noose slowly tightening around his corrupt nephew and some of the anger spilt over into this case.

Did you glean all this from Eenadu paper?

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

Propagandhi711 wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

"Indian authorities have opened an inquiry into whether Ms. Khobragade violated internal regulations that bar ministry officials from making unapproved statements to the media that could affect bilateral relations, according to an Indian official, who spoke about the diplomatic matter on the condition of anonymity."

It says the above. Why is this [cock-sucking] govt. raking up a dead and resolved issue? that too, going against the stand taken by the previous govt.

Ah! That explains your contortions.

comrade is also upset at the noose slowly tightening around his corrupt nephew and some of the anger spilt over into this case.

Did you glean all this from Eenadu paper?

??