Now that the dynasty is under attack , vilification of Bose starts

vilification of Bose starts

confuzzled dude wrote:

vilification of Bose starts

Really! Pot calling the kettle black? Wonder what our resident Israeli apologists take on Axis powers supporter Bose.

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

vilification of Bose starts

Really! Pot calling the kettle black? Wonder what our resident Israeli apologists take on Axis powers supporter Bose.

You're getting a little too excitable, Comrade.

Please revise your statement and make it comprehensible.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Hellsangel wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

vilification of Bose starts

Really! Pot calling the kettle black? Wonder what our resident Israeli apologists take on Axis powers supporter Bose.

You're getting a little too excitable, Comrade.

Please revise your statement and make it comprehensible.

?! If one can be called Comrade, Mullah for expressing neutral opinions, it is only fair that fervent supporters of Israel are called Israelis.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

If hatred for Nehru and his descendants wants to make you believe that Bose was a pristine democrat without a single autocratic bone in his body, feel free to disregard all the evidence too the contrary and hold on to your beliefs. While you're at it, you can also hold on to the other one claiming he's still alive and only waiting to reveal himself at an opportune time.

confuzzled dude wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

If hatred for Nehru and his descendants wants to make you believe that Bose was a pristine democrat without a single autocratic bone in his body, feel free to disregard all the evidence too the contrary and hold on to your beliefs. While you're at it, you can also hold on to the other one claiming he's still alive and only waiting to reveal himself at an opportune time.

Chaddis like to [conveniently] forget that Bose, like many of that generation, was a Socialist.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

If hatred for Nehru and his descendants wants to make you believe that Bose was a pristine democrat without a single autocratic bone in his body, feel free to disregard all the evidence too the contrary and hold on to your beliefs. While you're at it, you can also hold on to the other one claiming he's still alive and only waiting to reveal himself at an opportune time.

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

If hatred for Nehru and his descendants wants to make you believe that Bose was a pristine democrat without a single autocratic bone in his body, feel free to disregard all the evidence too the contrary and hold on to your beliefs. While you're at it, you can also hold on to the other one claiming he's still alive and only waiting to reveal himself at an opportune time.

One big downside for Indians (especially the Muslims) in losing Bose as the leader (president) of pre-Independence Congress party was in the country (India) getting divided on religious basis. Bose had a huge following among both the Hindus and Muslims, and if he had been the leader of Congress party there probably wouldn't be enough support (from Muslims) for creating a separate country (Pakistan) for them.

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Merlot Daruwala wrote:

ashdoc wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Netaji-Subhas-Chandra-Bose-wanted-ruthless-dictatorship-in-India-for-20-years/articleshow/46980513.cms

If hatred for Nehru and his descendants wants to make you believe that Bose was a pristine democrat without a single autocratic bone in his body, feel free to disregard all the evidence too the contrary and hold on to your beliefs. While you're at it, you can also hold on to the other one claiming he's still alive and only waiting to reveal himself at an opportune time.

One big downside for Indians (especially the Muslims) in losing Bose as the leader (president) of pre-Independence Congress party was in the country (India) getting divided on religious basis. Bose had a huge following among both the Hindus and Muslims, and if he had been the leader of Congress party there probably wouldn't be enough support (from Muslims) for creating a separate country (Pakistan) for them.

Good point. With a 20-25% Muslim population in an undivided India, Upps Aunty and other limpwristed types wouldn't be able to step out of their houses at any time, leave aside the post 8pm curfew they've had to live under in divided India.

Vakavaka Pakapaka wrote:
Great logic! Did you write Pappu's speech yesterday?