Rana Pratap, the great

confuzzled dude wrote:When are these idiot leaders from North India are going to learn that with thier (North Indian bent) nationalistic mindset they are going divide the country horizontally, who is and what is Rana Pratap's stature in Indian history compared to, say, Sri Krishna Devaraya?

confuzzled dude wrote:When are these idiot leaders from North India going to learn that, with thier (North Indian bent) nationalistic mindset they are going to divide the country horizontally, who is and what is Rana Pratap's stature in Indian history compared to, say, Sri Krishna Devaraya?

rawemotions wrote:
Nothing wrong in that. Rana pratap inspired many freedom fighters, across regions. So he deserves a place, so is Krishna Devarayya, who managed to fend off the Bahamani Sultans. 
So is Rajendra Chola . So is prithivraj and the most important of all, the Chandragupta Maurya, and Ashoka.

Similarly we need to especially educate the south folks about the (mis) deeds of Ghiyasuddin of Madurai  Sultananate and Tipu Sultan in Kerala, and present the true picture to all citizens of India. The young Muslims of South India. needs to especially learn about all these and evils of Political Islam.  Most folks (especially Tamils) seem to have no knowledge of the ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Madurai Sultanate. Unless it is done, creating a bedrock of support for secularism among Muslims is difficult.

These were conveniently erased from the history syllabus by the pseudo seculars and Political Islamists in cahoot with the Congress. All these need to be corrected

TruthSeeker wrote:(-:

A typical bait for NI vs. SI.

Pratap vs. Krishna Deva Rai or Chola?

Ha!

See - Thats the problem in our thinking. Instead of highlighting Maharana Pratap or Rai's or Chola's Patriotism, you tried to put them against each other, for responses.

For people with your mindset confuzzed dude, let me ask this - Do you think Sukhdev had more SI features than Bhagat Singh?

You get my point.

There are millions who do not fall for your Brit controlled mindset, how old are you?

Intentions only matter, not words.
TS.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
Nothing wrong in that. Rana pratap inspired many freedom fighters, across regions. So he deserves a place, so is Krishna Devarayya, who managed to fend off the Bahamani Sultans. 
So is Rajendra Chola . So is prithivraj and the most important of all, the Chandragupta Maurya, and Ashoka.

Similarly we need to especially educate the south folks about the (mis) deeds of Ghiyasuddin of Madurai  Sultananate and Tipu Sultan in Kerala, and present the true picture to all citizens of India. The young Muslims of South India. needs to especially learn about all these and evils of Political Islam.  Most folks (especially Tamils) seem to have no knowledge of the ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Madurai Sultanate. Unless it is done, creating a bedrock of support for secularism among Muslims is difficult.

These were conveniently erased from the history syllabus by the pseudo seculars and Political Islamists in cahoot with the Congress. All these need to be corrected

What's the legacy of Rana Pratap, if any? other than being a ruler of a small region in North India who stood up against Akbar. His legacy has already been blown out of proportion. It didn't deserve a lesson in A.P's grade level history books. He was nobody compared to Sri Krishna Devaraya or Akbar in the annals of Indian history.

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
Nothing wrong in that. Rana pratap inspired many freedom fighters, across regions. So he deserves a place, so is Krishna Devarayya, who managed to fend off the Bahamani Sultans. 
So is Rajendra Chola . So is prithivraj and the most important of all, the Chandragupta Maurya, and Ashoka.

Similarly we need to especially educate the south folks about the (mis) deeds of Ghiyasuddin of Madurai  Sultananate and Tipu Sultan in Kerala, and present the true picture to all citizens of India. The young Muslims of South India. needs to especially learn about all these and evils of Political Islam.  Most folks (especially Tamils) seem to have no knowledge of the ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Madurai Sultanate. Unless it is done, creating a bedrock of support for secularism among Muslims is difficult.

These were conveniently erased from the history syllabus by the pseudo seculars and Political Islamists in cahoot with the Congress. All these need to be corrected

What's the legacy of Rana Pratap, if any? other than being a ruler of a small region in North India who stood up against Akbar. His legacy has already been blown out of proportion. It didn't deserve a lesson in A.P's grade level history books. He was nobody compared to Sri Krishna Devaraya or Akbar in the annals of Indian history.

Pratap’s raison d’etre in history is his three-decade war against somebody as mighty as Akbar, he is a hero because he didn’t except the powerful Mughal ruler’s suzerainty. Had Akbar been a minnow, Pratap too would have been a non-entity.  Rana’s greatness is incumbent on Akbar’s; the Mughal emperor, though, doesn’t need the Rana to be propped up right up there with the likes of Ashoka.

Propagandhi711 wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
Nothing wrong in that. Rana pratap inspired many freedom fighters, across regions. So he deserves a place, so is Krishna Devarayya, who managed to fend off the Bahamani Sultans. 
So is Rajendra Chola . So is prithivraj and the most important of all, the Chandragupta Maurya, and Ashoka.

Similarly we need to especially educate the south folks about the (mis) deeds of Ghiyasuddin of Madurai  Sultananate and Tipu Sultan in Kerala, and present the true picture to all citizens of India. The young Muslims of South India. needs to especially learn about all these and evils of Political Islam.  Most folks (especially Tamils) seem to have no knowledge of the ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Madurai Sultanate. Unless it is done, creating a bedrock of support for secularism among Muslims is difficult.

These were conveniently erased from the history syllabus by the pseudo seculars and Political Islamists in cahoot with the Congress. All these need to be corrected

What's the legacy of Rana Pratap, if any? other than being a ruler of a small region in North India who stood up against Akbar. His legacy has already been blown out of proportion. It didn't deserve a lesson in A.P's grade level history books. He was nobody compared to Sri Krishna Devaraya or Akbar in the annals of Indian history.

southindian secular, muslim invader bhai-bhai

confuzzled dude wrote:

confuzzled dude wrote:

rawemotions wrote:
Nothing wrong in that. Rana pratap inspired many freedom fighters, across regions. So he deserves a place, so is Krishna Devarayya, who managed to fend off the Bahamani Sultans. 
So is Rajendra Chola . So is prithivraj and the most important of all, the Chandragupta Maurya, and Ashoka.

Similarly we need to especially educate the south folks about the (mis) deeds of Ghiyasuddin of Madurai  Sultananate and Tipu Sultan in Kerala, and present the true picture to all citizens of India. The young Muslims of South India. needs to especially learn about all these and evils of Political Islam.  Most folks (especially Tamils) seem to have no knowledge of the ethnic cleansing perpetrated by Madurai Sultanate. Unless it is done, creating a bedrock of support for secularism among Muslims is difficult.

These were conveniently erased from the history syllabus by the pseudo seculars and Political Islamists in cahoot with the Congress. All these need to be corrected

What's the legacy of Rana Pratap, if any? other than being a ruler of a small region in North India who stood up against Akbar. His legacy has already been blown out of proportion. It didn't deserve a lesson in A.P's grade level history books. He was nobody compared to Sri Krishna Devaraya or Akbar in the annals of Indian history.

bingo..

Pratap’s raison d’etre in history is his three-decade war against somebody as mighty as Akbar, he is a hero because he didn’t except the powerful Mughal ruler’s suzerainty. Had Akbar been a minnow, Pratap too would have been a non-entity.  Rana’s greatness is incumbent on Akbar’s; the Mughal emperor, though, doesn’t need the Rana to be propped up right up there with the likes of Ashoka.

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/akbar-vs-rana-pratap-rajnath-singh-has-no-business-making-history-just-about-religion-2250044.html

confuzzled dude wrote:

bingo..

 he didn’t except the powerful Mughal ruler’s suzerainty. 

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/akbar-vs-rana-pratap-rajnath-singh-has-no-business-making-history-just-about-religion-2250044.html