Survey on Ashley Madison disaster

Propagandhi711 wrote:why you all hopped up? it's white ppl problems. how many indians would actually be fucking around on that place, seriously?

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 



[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

Propagandhi711 wrote:why you all hopped up? it's white ppl problems. how many indians would actually be fucking around on that place, seriously?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:ugh @ the cesspool of disease floating around. why would anyone want to hookup with a complete stranger?

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:ugh @ the cesspool of disease floating around. why would anyone want to hookup with a complete stranger?

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 





[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 







[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

My point ("It's nature's justice.") was only with respect to everyone involved, contributing to the above controversy, getting eventually entangled in this mess, and nothing else.

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 

[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

My point ("It's nature's justice.") was only with respect to everyone involved, contributing to the above controversy, getting eventually entangled in this mess, and nothing else.

Ya, i support the hackers. Kudos to them!

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 



[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

My point ("It's nature's justice.") was only with respect to everyone involved, contributing to the above controversy, getting eventually entangled in this mess, and nothing else.

Ya, i support the hackers. Kudos to them!

why ?...

do you approve of the damage it causes to a lot of families ?

I thought you said humans were not meant to be monogamous and would supporting the hackers contradict your stand ?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Seva Lamberdar wrote:It's nature's justice.

How can you be sure nature favors monogamy? Look at the mind boggling data here. Isn't something seriously wrong if that is the case? 







[th]Available in[/th][th]Users[/th][th][/th]

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian and European), Russian, Slovenian, Spanish (European, American), Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian

More than 37 million (as of July 2015)[1]

My point ("It's nature's justice.") was only with respect to everyone involved, contributing to the above controversy, getting eventually entangled in this mess, and nothing else.

Ya, i support the hackers. Kudos to them!

why ?...

do you approve of the damage it causes to a lot of families ?

I thought you said humans were not meant to be monogamous and would supporting the hackers contradict your stand ?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:all the rules matter
both before and after
this is the moment of lust
feels right for the two of us
can't justify it, can't fight it
welcome to the gray panoramic

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:all the rules matter
both before and after
this is the moment of lust
feels right for the two of us
can't justify it, can't fight it
welcome to the gray panoramic

Ya, i guess one got to accept that. That is what I said, change the expectations. Change from, 'omg! they cheated. how horrible! they are so morally down' to 'Yeah, it can happen. Probably that's a natural thing and that's ok. Accept it.' Now are the families of the 37 million going to be broken? I guess not. Change is being forced on to the society, like it or not.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:all the rules matter
both before and after
this is the moment of lust
feels right for the two of us
can't justify it, can't fight it
welcome to the gray panoramic

Ya, i guess one got to accept that. That is what I said, change the expectations. Change from, 'omg! they cheated. how horrible! they are so morally down' to 'Yeah, it can happen. Probably that's a natural thing and that's ok. Accept it.' Now are the families of the 37 million going to be broken? I guess not. Change is being forced on to the society, like it or not.

don't know... still a very individual choice... I have been in committed relationships two times in my life, and both the times I was downright faithful and expected the same. I was still open with xb, to some extent, but was outright possessive about xh. am not now. with time I opened up of course, and I would say morally degraded quite a bit. now I am at a stage that if someone tells me they messed around, I ask them how was it; all the while following the monogamy rule myself. you can say double standards, open about others, strict about myself. if I get into a committed relationship again, I may be a bit more open, but hell no. monogamy is not out for me. guess it never was. will expect him to be monogamous as well, but won't spy on him.

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:all the rules matter
both before and after
this is the moment of lust
feels right for the two of us
can't justify it, can't fight it
welcome to the gray panoramic

Ya, i guess one got to accept that. That is what I said, change the expectations. Change from, 'omg! they cheated. how horrible! they are so morally down' to 'Yeah, it can happen. Probably that's a natural thing and that's ok. Accept it.' Now are the families of the 37 million going to be broken? I guess not. Change is being forced on to the society, like it or not.

don't know... still a very individual choice... I have been in committed relationships two times in my life, and both the times I was downright faithful and expected the same. I was still open with xb, to some extent, but was outright possessive about xh. am not now. with time I opened up of course, and I would say morally degraded quite a bit. now I am at a stage that if someone tells me they messed around, I ask them how was it; all the while following the monogamy rule myself. you can say double standards, open about others, strict about myself. if I get into a committed relationship again, I may be a bit more open, but hell no. monogamy is not out for me. guess it never was. will expect him to be monogamous as well, but won't spy on him.

Have you realized one thing? Being possessive about someone (and the controlling, the suspicions, the jealousies, the hatred etc that come along with it) is more morally degrading than being open, accepting and non judgmental about someone over their personal choices?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:all the rules matter
both before and after
this is the moment of lust
feels right for the two of us
can't justify it, can't fight it
welcome to the gray panoramic

Ya, i guess one got to accept that. That is what I said, change the expectations. Change from, 'omg! they cheated. how horrible! they are so morally down' to 'Yeah, it can happen. Probably that's a natural thing and that's ok. Accept it.' Now are the families of the 37 million going to be broken? I guess not. Change is being forced on to the society, like it or not.

don't know... still a very individual choice... I have been in committed relationships two times in my life, and both the times I was downright faithful and expected the same. I was still open with xb, to some extent, but was outright possessive about xh. am not now. with time I opened up of course, and I would say morally degraded quite a bit. now I am at a stage that if someone tells me they messed around, I ask them how was it; all the while following the monogamy rule myself. you can say double standards, open about others, strict about myself. if I get into a committed relationship again, I may be a bit more open, but hell no. monogamy is not out for me. guess it never was. will expect him to be monogamous as well, but won't spy on him.

Have you realized one thing? Being possessive about someone (and the controlling, the suspicions, the jealousies, the hatred etc that come along with it) is more morally degrading than being open, accepting and non judgmental about someone over their personal choices?

It was what it was. Simply stating how I was, and how I am  not proud of it. I have been intrigued by the open relationship idea, but have not fully bought into it. If you are my husband or boyfriend and I love you, then you are not messing around dammit. It's alright to say you are open, it's another thing to learn you are a secret joke in a group of common friends. Was I constantly suspecting, spying, hating on xh? Not at all. He didn't give me reasons to. I can be a pretty ignorant person. But once I am curious/suspicious about something, it's for a reason, and then it's a spiral slope for me . We are still together simply because at the time I was convinced that he didn't cheat on me. Else that chapter would have been long over. I could be wrong about my conviction, and at this time it doesn't matter.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Ya, i guess one got to accept that. That is what I said, change the expectations. Change from, 'omg! they cheated. how horrible! they are so morally down' to 'Yeah, it can happen. Probably that's a natural thing and that's ok. Accept it.' Now are the families of the 37 million going to be broken? I guess not. Change is being forced on to the society, like it or not.

don't know... still a very individual choice... I have been in committed relationships two times in my life, and both the times I was downright faithful and expected the same. I was still open with xb, to some extent, but was outright possessive about xh. am not now. with time I opened up of course, and I would say morally degraded quite a bit. now I am at a stage that if someone tells me they messed around, I ask them how was it; all the while following the monogamy rule myself. you can say double standards, open about others, strict about myself. if I get into a committed relationship again, I may be a bit more open, but hell no. monogamy is not out for me. guess it never was. will expect him to be monogamous as well, but won't spy on him.

Have you realized one thing? Being possessive about someone (and the controlling, the suspicions, the jealousies, the hatred etc that come along with it) is more morally degrading than being open, accepting and non judgmental about someone over their personal choices?

It was what it was. Simply stating how I was, and how I am  not proud of it. I have been intrigued by the open relationship idea, but have not fully bought into it. If you are my husband or boyfriend and I love you, then you are not messing around dammit. It's alright to say you are open, it's another thing to learn you are a secret joke in a group of common friends. Was I constantly suspecting, spying, hating on xh? Not at all. He didn't give me reasons to. I can be a pretty ignorant person. But once I am curious/suspicious about something, it's for a reason, and then it's a spiral slope for me . We are still together simply because at the time I was convinced that he didn't cheat on me. Else that chapter would have been long over. I could be wrong about my conviction, and at this time it doesn't matter.

Whatchya two talkin?

Couldn't you two be specific, explicit, and direct?...

How else can we judge you two ?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:...So who is morally wrong - or wrongest?

Kinnera wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:


don't know... still a very individual choice... I have been in committed relationships two times in my life, and both the times I was downright faithful and expected the same. I was still open with xb, to some extent, but was outright possessive about xh. am not now. with time I opened up of course, and I would say morally degraded quite a bit. now I am at a stage that if someone tells me they messed around, I ask them how was it; all the while following the monogamy rule myself. you can say double standards, open about others, strict about myself. if I get into a committed relationship again, I may be a bit more open, but hell no. monogamy is not out for me. guess it never was. will expect him to be monogamous as well, but won't spy on him.

Have you realized one thing? Being possessive about someone (and the controlling, the suspicions, the jealousies, the hatred etc that come along with it) is more morally degrading than being open, accepting and non judgmental about someone over their personal choices?

It was what it was. Simply stating how I was, and how I am  not proud of it. I have been intrigued by the open relationship idea, but have not fully bought into it. If you are my husband or boyfriend and I love you, then you are not messing around dammit. It's alright to say you are open, it's another thing to learn you are a secret joke in a group of common friends. Was I constantly suspecting, spying, hating on xh? Not at all. He didn't give me reasons to. I can be a pretty ignorant person. But once I am curious/suspicious about something, it's for a reason, and then it's a spiral slope for me . We are still together simply because at the time I was convinced that he didn't cheat on me. Else that chapter would have been long over. I could be wrong about my conviction, and at this time it doesn't matter.

Whatchya two talkin?

Couldn't you two be specific, explicit, and direct?...

How else can we judge you two ?

nothin'. Just trying to be the broadminded hippie types, not the judgmental conservatives

Kris wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:...So who is morally wrong - or wrongest?

>>>I thought this was a woman's clothing store when I heard the name. Some questions:

1) Who the hell has the time?
2) Does a guy have to register on a website for this extra-curricular mischief?
3) Why risk diseases, which almost certainly will come with the territory?

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Kris wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:...So who is morally wrong - or wrongest?

>>>I thought this was a woman's clothing store when I heard the name. Some questions:

1) Who the hell has the time?
2) Does a guy have to register on a website for this extra-curricular mischief?
3) Why risk diseases, which almost certainly will come with the territory?

yeah...rite....how come i found your id in their database ?

and, worse talking to Bittu and rev Flimmy who were posing as women...

MaxEntropy_Man wrote:ugh @ the cesspool of disease floating around. why would anyone want to hookup with a complete stranger?

Kris wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
Have you realized one thing? Being possessive about someone (and the controlling, the suspicions, the jealousies, the hatred etc that come along with it) is more morally degrading than being open, accepting and non judgmental about someone over their personal choices?

It was what it was. Simply stating how I was, and how I am  not proud of it. I have been intrigued by the open relationship idea, but have not fully bought into it. If you are my husband or boyfriend and I love you, then you are not messing around dammit. It's alright to say you are open, it's another thing to learn you are a secret joke in a group of common friends. Was I constantly suspecting, spying, hating on xh? Not at all. He didn't give me reasons to. I can be a pretty ignorant person. But once I am curious/suspicious about something, it's for a reason, and then it's a spiral slope for me . We are still together simply because at the time I was convinced that he didn't cheat on me. Else that chapter would have been long over. I could be wrong about my conviction, and at this time it doesn't matter.

Whatchya two talkin?

Couldn't you two be specific, explicit, and direct?...

How else can we judge you two ?

nothin'. Just trying to be the broadminded hippie types, not the judgmental conservatives

>>et tu, brute?