One reason why it's not a good idea to fight on this forum

[Guest]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

[Merlot Daruwala]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

[Guest]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

[MaxEntropy_Man]

so it's a tweet of a "tweet"? why didn't he choose to tweet the original article? you didn't editorialize or add any original content, did you?

[Guest]

so it's a tweet of a "tweet"? why didn't he choose to tweet the original article? you didn't editorialize or add any original content, did you?

No I did not add any original content to the article. It could be that he wanted to draw attention to my posts.

[smArtha]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

So you are hinting that

>> Sir if you are reading this please know that 

a)Sidhartha Varadarajan is lurking around here incognito 

and 

>> I am a fan of yours.

b) Your expression of loyalty will result in more of your posts being tweeted to his followers

Good Luck

[Marathadi-Saamiyaar]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

So he tweeted your post - which had NOTHING but cut/vomit from an opinion column... and now you claim that as your own.

And BTW, it had ZERO responses, that shows the validity of the column and the emptiness of your "thread" and the NULLness in your originality.

[Guest]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

So you are hinting that

>> Sir if you are reading this please know that 

a)Sidhartha Varadarajan is lurking around here incognito 

and 

>> I am a fan of yours.

b) Your expression of loyalty will result in more of your posts being tweeted to his followers

Good Luck

Your nonsense has been exposed here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t21005-why-mukesh-ambani-and-reliance-is-going-all-in-on-narendra-modi#145953

[Guest]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

So he tweeted your post - which had NOTHING but cut/vomit from an opinion column... and now you claim that as your own.

And BTW, it had ZERO responses, that shows the validity of the column and the emptiness of your "thread" and the NULLness in your originality.

That is why I wrote earlier that he may have given the link to that post so as to draw attention to my posts. I have given my own views on various threads. For instance see here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20572-where-is-the-bloody-border-the-arrogant-men-of-1962

Or here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20591-the-1841-war-between-india-and-china

[smArtha]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

So you are hinting that

>> Sir if you are reading this please know that 

a)Sidhartha Varadarajan is lurking around here incognito 

and 

>> I am a fan of yours.

b) Your expression of loyalty will result in more of your posts being tweeted to his followers

Good Luck

Your nonsense has been exposed here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t21005-why-mukesh-ambani-and-reliance-is-going-all-in-on-narendra-modi#145953

:-) Nice and yours many more time with innumerable posts flooding these forums. Nope.. I'm not going to dig up that dirt again even as examples.

[Rishi]

Rashmun,

SV included https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes not the one on Indo-China war.

[Guest]

Rashmun,

SV included https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes not the one on Indo-China war.

See my response to Merlot again. I gave the same link ( about Guha and Modi).

[Marathadi-Saamiyaar]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

So he tweeted your post - which had NOTHING but cut/vomit from an opinion column... and now you claim that as your own.

And BTW, it had ZERO responses, that shows the validity of the column and the emptiness of your "thread" and the NULLness in your originality.

That is why I wrote earlier that he may have given the link to that post so as to draw attention to my posts. I have given my own views on various threads.
For instance see here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20572-where-is-the-bloody-border-the-arrogant-men-of-1962

Or here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20591-the-1841-war-between-india-and-china

Oh really...please...use them sparingly and dont run out of them.

[Guest]

Which post was this, Rashmun?

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

So he tweeted your post - which had NOTHING but cut/vomit from an opinion column... and now you claim that as your own.

And BTW, it had ZERO responses, that shows the validity of the column and the emptiness of your "thread" and the NULLness in your originality.

That is why I wrote earlier that he may have given the link to that post so as to draw attention to my posts. I have given my own views on various threads.
For instance see here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20572-where-is-the-bloody-border-the-arrogant-men-of-1962

Or here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20591-the-1841-war-between-india-and-china

Oh really...please...use them sparingly and dont run out of them.

Do you remember your old 'Morning Coffee' posts on the old Sulekha forum in which you would collect philosophical stories and anecdotes from here and there, put them together and then post it as a forum post pretending as if the content had been written by you. You even gained a fan following based on your cut and paste posts. Then once somebody gave the link to the article from where you had cut and pasted your most recent philosophical discourse and Kaboom! Your cut and paste posts immediately came to an end.

[b_A]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

[Guest]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

[nevada]

Sidharta ji, fighting is our birthright and we will do so everyday. So stop looking for intellectual tidbits here and just buzz off.

[Merlot Daruwala]

Quit nitpicking, y'all. All you gents (and one conquered woman) are simply jealous of the attention our Rashmun is receiving from S Varadarajan and his 68,000 followers. Be grateful instead, for the publicity he's brought for this humble forum in "real" social media.

[Guest]

Sidharta ji, fighting is our birthright and we will do so everyday. So stop looking for intellectual tidbits here and just buzz off.

LOL

[Impedimenta]

MD, pick a side and stick with it, please    It's really hard to decipher your agenda:-)

[b_A]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

[b_A]

Quit nitpicking, y'all. All you gents (and one conquered woman) are simply jealous of the attention our Rashmun is receiving from S Varadarajan and his 68,000 followers. Be grateful instead, for the publicity he's brought for this humble forum in "real" social media.

We don't want publicity to this forum. We want it to remain the way it is.

[Guest]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

[b_A]

Just a few days ago ( Feb 26 ) Sidhartha Varadarajan tweeted a link to one of my posts to his over 68,000 followers ( not counting those who are not following him on twitter but read his tweets ). Varadarajan is the former Editor of the Hindu newspaper and Sir if you are reading this please know that I have read the book edited by you on the Gujarat riots ( in parts ) and I am a fan of yours.

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

Just a reminder that if the guy has 68k followers , they don't follow all his tweets religiously and follow all the forums that he mentions in passing.

[Guest]

All the more reasons to expose your stupidity. A casual visitor might just see one or two posts of yours and think you are the scholarly PhD type. If he/she sees the true caliber of your posts like "you thought TN is your alternate handle" , he will get the actual estimate of your caliber.

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

Just a reminder that if the guy has 68k followers , they don't follow all his tweets religiously and follow all the forums that he mentions in passing.

I follow SV's tweets regularly. To the best of my knowledge this is the only online forum he has referred to in his tweets.

[b_A]

Rahul Gandhi is claiming he will obliterate the BJP "with love". Your comments?

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

Just a reminder that if the guy has 68k followers , they don't follow all his tweets religiously and follow all the forums that he mentions in passing.

I follow SV's tweets regularly. To the best of my knowledge this is the only online forum he has referred to in his tweets.

you are "self employed" and can afford to spend the time non-productively. Others are not like that.

[Guest]

I don't think too much about idiots. Whether it is Rahul or Rashmun.

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

Just a reminder that if the guy has 68k followers , they don't follow all his tweets religiously and follow all the forums that he mentions in passing.

I follow SV's tweets regularly. To the best of my knowledge this is the only online forum he has referred to in his tweets.

you are "self employed" and can afford to spend the time non-productively. Others are not like that.

I was writing my new book on the Mughals when I wrote that. These days I am hunting for diamonds in Greenland.

[b_A]

Thank you for clarifying your position to SV's 68,000 followers.

Just a reminder that if the guy has 68k followers , they don't follow all his tweets religiously and follow all the forums that he mentions in passing.

I follow SV's tweets regularly. To the best of my knowledge this is the only online forum he has referred to in his tweets.

you are "self employed" and can afford to spend the time non-productively. Others are not like that.

I was writing  my new book on the Mughals when I wrote that. These days I am hunting for diamonds in Greenland.

Yeah right! Most self employed are too busy to even watch TV for half an hour on weekends. Forget about spending hours on SuCH.

[Marathadi-Saamiyaar]

https://such.forumotion.com/t20029-ramachandra-guha-hits-back-at-narendra-modi-they-say-a-writer-is-known-by-the-enemies-he-makes

So he tweeted your post - which had NOTHING but cut/vomit from an opinion column... and now you claim that as your own.

And BTW, it had ZERO responses, that shows the validity of the column and the emptiness of your "thread" and the NULLness in your originality.

That is why I wrote earlier that he may have given the link to that post so as to draw attention to my posts. I have given my own views on various threads.
For instance see here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20572-where-is-the-bloody-border-the-arrogant-men-of-1962

Or here:

https://such.forumotion.com/t20591-the-1841-war-between-india-and-china

Oh really...please...use them sparingly and dont run out of them.

Do you remember your old 'Morning Coffee' posts on the old Sulekha forum in which you would collect philosophical stories and anecdotes from here and there, put them together and then post it as a forum post pretending as if the content had been written by you. You even gained a fan following based on your cut and paste posts. Then once somebody gave the link to the article from where you had cut and pasted your most recent philosophical discourse and Kaboom! Your cut and paste posts immediately came to an end.

now don't "Doctor" your facts... It was mentioned again and again during the posts that those were from the net, and of course, repeated numerous times to you and your "lady partner" after 2004. of course, you will continue to lie hoping the lie will stick and become a "factoid" Just look at yourself and your "lady Partner" and see how many friends you both have on this forum...there is a reason for that but you are in denial.

[Sponsored content]