[Rashmun and b_a]

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:
you pick up a poster from your list by 7 pm eastern tonight, or I will. Then you have until next morning to write about him/her by tomorrow morning, or else I will.

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

You shouldn't have dragged it until this point, Rashmun. She has given you enough warnings and time to mend your way and apologize. You didn't. You still have time. Apologize and save yourself and others who you dragged into this.

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

You shouldn't have dragged it until this point, Rashmun. She has given you enough warnings and time to mend your way and apologize. You didn't. You still have time. Apologize and save yourself and others who you dragged into this.

now i know why flimflam calls you the south indian slave of Tracy.

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:
you pick up a poster from your list by 7 pm eastern tonight, or I will. Then you have until next morning to write about him/her by tomorrow morning, or else I will.

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

. But Rashmun, I thought you said that the admin isn't her friend anymore. That he dumped her and took her off his fb friends' list too.

PS: I do feel sorry for all the posters that Rashmun dragged into this rut (along with me). They don't deserve this.

i only said that one of them has unfriended the other person on facebook. why this happened is open to speculation. the fact that you have started to lie so brazenly is apparently because of the company you are keeping. Ditto for the fact that Tracy-gossip (like her claim that my girlfriend is married with children) is music to your ears, whereas you go around claiming that you are against anyone gossiping. Do you do namaskaram to her picture every day when you awaken from your slumber?

What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:YOU are the one who has been throwing allegations at me for 2-3 months now. YOU are the one throwing those names at me. Now prove it asshole, or apologize, and never ever create another thread/post/allegation in my name, ever again. Better still, quit this forum.

Honestly, at this point if we could all get together and urge the admin to ban you from forum, that would be ideal. I was against banning earlier, but for this chhachhundar, I would like to see it get executed.

are you going to be posting your cooked up stories from 7 pm eastern time onwards, or have you now changed your mind? Regarding banning me, other than the fact that it would be against the stated rules of this forum, you may find that the admin himself would be supportive of me despite my past differences with him. most people in the loop of what you have been doing here are sick of your behavior. in fact i would not be surprised if the admin would prefer that you leave this forum and peddle your nonsense somewhere else.

you pick up a poster from your list by 7 pm eastern tonight, or I will. Then you have until next morning to write about him/her by tomorrow morning, or else I will.

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

either except my challenge, or apologize.

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

. But Rashmun, I thought you said that the admin isn't her friend anymore. That he dumped her and took her off his fb friends' list too.

PS: I do feel sorry for all the posters that Rashmun dragged into this rut (along with me). They don't deserve this.

i only said that one of them has unfriended the other person on facebook. why this happened is open to speculation. the fact that you have started to lie so brazenly is apparently because of the company you are keeping. Ditto for the fact that Tracy-gossip (like her claim that my girlfriend is married with children) is music to your ears, whereas you go around claiming that you are against anyone gossiping. Do you do namaskaram to her picture every day when you awaken from your slumber?

What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
. But Rashmun, I thought you said that the admin isn't her friend anymore. That he dumped her and took her off his fb friends' list too.

PS: I do feel sorry for all the posters that Rashmun dragged into this rut (along with me). They don't deserve this.

i only said that one of them has unfriended the other person on facebook. why this happened is open to speculation. the fact that you have started to lie so brazenly is apparently because of the company you are keeping. Ditto for the fact that Tracy-gossip (like her claim that my girlfriend is married with children) is music to your ears, whereas you go around claiming that you are against anyone gossiping. Do you do namaskaram to her picture every day when you awaken from your slumber?

What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

are you going to be posting your cooked up stories from 7 pm eastern time onwards, or have you now changed your mind? Regarding banning me, other than the fact that it would be against the stated rules of this forum, you may find that the admin himself would be supportive of me despite my past differences with him. most people in the loop of what you have been doing here are sick of your behavior. in fact i would not be surprised if the admin would prefer that you leave this forum and peddle your nonsense somewhere else.

you pick up a poster from your list by 7 pm eastern tonight, or I will. Then you have until next morning to write about him/her by tomorrow morning, or else I will.

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

i only said that one of them has unfriended the other person on facebook. why this happened is open to speculation. the fact that you have started to lie so brazenly is apparently because of the company you are keeping. Ditto for the fact that Tracy-gossip (like her claim that my girlfriend is married with children) is music to your ears, whereas you go around claiming that you are against anyone gossiping. Do you do namaskaram to her picture every day when you awaken from your slumber?

What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

you pick up a poster from your list by 7 pm eastern tonight, or I will. Then you have until next morning to write about him/her by tomorrow morning, or else I will.

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

sir ji you have done nothing so on no occasion. you CLAIMED pp her friend - you CONTRADICTED yourself. you claimed impy her friend - impy CONTRADICTED you.  you claimed she cooked up stories - i will CONTRADICT you. you claim she shared kinns' photo with bittu - i will CONTRADICT you. you have only been CONTRADICTED (NEXT IS INDICTED). as to why i did not step in earlier -- it's only 'cos of diwali posts that i am active for a few days -- then i will be absent again. this exchange happened to catch my eye.

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

sir ji you have done nothing so on no occasion. you CLAIMED pp her friend - you CONTRADICTED yourself. you claimed impy her friend - impy CONTRADICTED you.  you claimed she cooked up stories - i will CONTRADICT you. you claim she shared kinns' photo with bittu - i will CONTRADICT you. you have only been CONTRADICTED (NEXT IS INDICTED). as to why i did not step in earlier -- it's only 'cos of diwali posts that i am active for a few days -- then i will be absent again. this exchange happened to catch my eye.

shouldn't you add a disclaimer in your post that tracy knows you personally off the forum, that you are in communication with her through private notes and email and perhaps the occasional phone call, and that she has requested you to save her skin by hook or by crook? Further, what exactly are you doing on this forum anyways? Didn't you say you have decided to quit this forum because it is infested with south indians? Did you come back because Tracy asked you to return?

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

sir ji you have done nothing so on no occasion. you CLAIMED pp her friend - you CONTRADICTED yourself. you claimed impy her friend - impy CONTRADICTED you.  you claimed she cooked up stories - i will CONTRADICT you. you claim she shared kinns' photo with bittu - i will CONTRADICT you. you have only been CONTRADICTED (NEXT IS INDICTED). as to why i did not step in earlier -- it's only 'cos of diwali posts that i am active for a few days -- then i will be absent again. this exchange happened to catch my eye.

shouldn't you add a disclaimer in your post that tracy knows you personally off the forum, that you are in communication with her through private notes and email and perhaps the occasional phone call, and that she has requested you to save her skin by hook or by crook? Further, what exactly are you doing on this forum anyways? Didn't you say you have decided to quit this forum because it is infested with south indians? Did you come back because Tracy asked you to return?

I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

sir ji you have done nothing so on no occasion. you CLAIMED pp her friend - you CONTRADICTED yourself. you claimed impy her friend - impy CONTRADICTED you.  you claimed she cooked up stories - i will CONTRADICT you. you claim she shared kinns' photo with bittu - i will CONTRADICT you. you have only been CONTRADICTED (NEXT IS INDICTED). as to why i did not step in earlier -- it's only 'cos of diwali posts that i am active for a few days -- then i will be absent again. this exchange happened to catch my eye.

shouldn't you add a disclaimer in your post that tracy knows you personally off the forum, that you are in communication with her through private notes and email and perhaps the occasional phone call, and that she has requested you to save her skin by hook or by crook? Further, what exactly are you doing on this forum anyways? Didn't you say you have decided to quit this forum because it is infested with south indians? Did you come back because Tracy asked you to return?

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:
What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

haha... nice try. you know the drill.

- you either apologize and admit that whatever you said was a lie
- or you tell who has been feeding crack to you
- or you quit the forum for atleast until end of this year
- AND you never ever post a thread/post in my name throwing baseless allegations at me.

or
- you come up with the name of a poster from your list by 7 pm, and tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them.
- or I will pick a poster AND by tomorrow morning you will have to tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them. Else, I will post my interactions with them.

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

haha... nice try. you know the drill.

- you either apologize and admit that whatever you said was a lie
- or you tell who has been feeding crack to you
- or you quit the forum for atleast until end of this year
- AND you never ever post a thread/post in my name throwing baseless allegations at me.

or
- you come up with the name of a poster from your list by 7 pm, and tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them.
- or I will pick a poster AND by tomorrow morning you will have to tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them. Else, I will post my interactions with them.

why would you possibly think i would succumb to your threat and blackmail?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

haha... nice try. you know the drill.

- you either apologize and admit that whatever you said was a lie
- or you tell who has been feeding crack to you
- or you quit the forum for atleast until end of this year
- AND you never ever post a thread/post in my name throwing baseless allegations at me.

or
- you come up with the name of a poster from your list by 7 pm, and tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them.
- or I will pick a poster AND by tomorrow morning you will have to tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them. Else, I will post my interactions with them.

why would you possibly think i would succumb to your threat and blackmail?

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Further, since you now think nobody is making me privy to information related to you, does this mean that you will not be posting your cooked up stories about some poster from 7 pm eastern time?

haha... nice try. you know the drill.

- you either apologize and admit that whatever you said was a lie
- or you tell who has been feeding crack to you
- or you quit the forum for atleast until end of this year
- AND you never ever post a thread/post in my name throwing baseless allegations at me.

or
- you come up with the name of a poster from your list by 7 pm, and tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them.
- or I will pick a poster AND by tomorrow morning you will have to tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them. Else, I will post my interactions with them.

why would you possibly think i would succumb to your threat and blackmail?

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

haha... nice try. you know the drill.

- you either apologize and admit that whatever you said was a lie
- or you tell who has been feeding crack to you
- or you quit the forum for atleast until end of this year
- AND you never ever post a thread/post in my name throwing baseless allegations at me.

or
- you come up with the name of a poster from your list by 7 pm, and tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them.
- or I will pick a poster AND by tomorrow morning you will have to tell me how I was their friend and how I betrayed them. Else, I will post my interactions with them.

why would you possibly think i would succumb to your threat and blackmail?

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Rashmun wrote:there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

Marathadi-Saamiyaar wrote:
Wait...was Petrichor a female ?

All these names appear so vague.

Funny how Al-Akbari claims he could not prove this on the net or prove that on a forum, but has no hesitation to use "fact" twice in every sentence. Whenever he spreads gossip he uses "claimed that... heard that...someone said that...."  as if it absolves him of gossiping.

someone said that he is actually someone who used to come as Narendra Uppadhyaya. I remember that guy's posts 10 years ago and they were never like Al-Akbaris. What happened and what changed him?

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

why would you possibly think i would succumb to your threat and blackmail?

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Hahaha. Kinnera has openly admitted in a forum post that you apologized to her for sharing her picture without her permission with others. if you did not share it with Bittu, who did you share it with? Also, why don't you start with explaining why you shared bw's picture with Bittu (without bw's permission)?

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Hahaha. Kinnera has openly admitted in a forum post that you apologized to her for sharing her picture without her permission with others. if you did not share it with Bittu, who did you share it with? Also, why don't you start with explaining why you shared bw's picture with Bittu (without bw's permission)?

That was HA, not bittu.

Ok. BW is next. I will post all about my interactions with BW by tomorrow morning, and I will mention the "picture" story too, which btw I never shared with bittu w/o her permission.

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Hahaha. Kinnera has openly admitted in a forum post that you apologized to her for sharing her picture without her permission with others. if you did not share it with Bittu, who did you share it with? Also, why don't you start with explaining why you shared bw's picture with Bittu (without bw's permission)?

That was HA, not bittu.

Ok. BW is next. I will post all about my interactions with BW by tomorrow morning, and I will mention the "picture" story too, which btw I never shared with bittu w/o her permission.

Looking forward to reading more of your cooked up stories.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:
I have explained about bw's pic a dozen times. I will not explain any more. Believe whatever the fuck you want.

Rashmun wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Hahaha. Kinnera has openly admitted in a forum post that you apologized to her for sharing her picture without her permission with others. if you did not share it with Bittu, who did you share it with? Also, why don't you start with explaining why you shared bw's picture with Bittu (without bw's permission)?

That was HA, not bittu.

Ok. BW is next. I will post all about my interactions with BW by tomorrow morning, and I will mention the "picture" story too, which btw I never shared with bittu w/o her permission.

Looking forward to reading more of your cooked up stories.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:
I have explained about bw's pic a dozen times. I will not explain any more. Believe whatever the fuck you want.

https://such.forumotion.com/t26423-beatrix-kiddo#173449

------

just make sure there are no inconsistencies with this new version and the previous versions of your cooked up story.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

And what made YOU think that you can post any bullshit about other posters and me, and I will not respond? Prove what you said. I am giving you enough time to back out.

there is no way to prove through a forum post of mine that you shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission, or that you shared the real identity of petrichor with others or that you shared private information of petrichor and sublime with others.  i had in fact asked you to explain why you had shared bw's picture with Bittu without bw's permission (in the same way that you had shared Kinnera's picture with Bittu without Kinnera's permission) but you had declined to do so although you did admit to having done the dirty deed.

I never shared kinnera's pic with bittu, with or without her permission.

so now, which one do you want to discuss first?

bw?
petrichor?
sublime?

Hahaha. Kinnera has openly admitted in a forum post that you apologized to her for sharing her picture without her permission with others. if you did not share it with Bittu, who did you share it with? Also, why don't you start with explaining why you shared bw's picture with Bittu (without bw's permission)?

That was HA, not bittu.

Ok. BW is next. I will post all about my interactions with BW by tomorrow morning, and I will mention the "picture" story too, which btw I never shared with bittu w/o her permission.

Rashmun wrote:

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

i only said that one of them has unfriended the other person on facebook. why this happened is open to speculation. the fact that you have started to lie so brazenly is apparently because of the company you are keeping. Ditto for the fact that Tracy-gossip (like her claim that my girlfriend is married with children) is music to your ears, whereas you go around claiming that you are against anyone gossiping. Do you do namaskaram to her picture every day when you awaken from your slumber?

What lies did I tell? Nothing! You are the one who is cooking up stories, gossiping, blackmailing and blatantly lying. Shame on you! What kind of a horrible person are you? Don't you feel like puking when you look at yourself in the mirror?

i made it clear that although the facebook unfriending did take place i am not sure who unfriended whom. hence you are lying when you say that i am claiming that Panini unfriended her. He may have unfriended her for certain reasons; but it is equally possible that she may have unfriended him for certain reasons.

I asked you to provide a timeline of the "unfriending". I even gave you a 6 month leeway. You couldn't do that. What you did do was try to tell people how caru unfriended me coz he was disappointed by me. Then you were saying that you speculated, now you don't even know who unfriended who!!! Akkal hai ya ghaas phoos?

your PP claim is a FAIL! Move on to next poster. Who do you wanna drag into this one? Who is the one supposedly making you "privy" to all the information related to me? You know what I think? NO ONE is. But feel free to drag them more, and I will too.

i clarified that panini may have unfriended you or else you may have unfriended him. i speculated that if he unfriended you it could be because he was sick of your penchant to tell lies and gossip about others. and i also speculated that if you unfriended him it could be after he reprimanded you for telling lies and gossiping about others. all this is present in my past posts. i am not going to fall into your trap of 6 month leeway for two reasons. first it is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant (as GC would say); and secondly being a chronic liar you are likely to deny that the unfriending took place during this duration even if i gave you the exact date of the unfriending.

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

madrasi_idiot wrote:

how the fuck do you know it is cooked up? why don't you refute it with proof?

i have already done so on more than one occasion. the tracy story is now coming to an end. you should have intervened earlier if you wanted to save her.

sir ji you have done nothing so on no occasion. you CLAIMED pp her friend - you CONTRADICTED yourself. you claimed impy her friend - impy CONTRADICTED you.  you claimed she cooked up stories - i will CONTRADICT you. you claim she shared kinns' photo with bittu - i will CONTRADICT you. you have only been CONTRADICTED (NEXT IS INDICTED). as to why i did not step in earlier -- it's only 'cos of diwali posts that i am active for a few days -- then i will be absent again. this exchange happened to catch my eye.

shouldn't you add a disclaimer in your post that tracy knows you personally off the forum, that you are in communication with her through private notes and email and perhaps the occasional phone call, and that she has requested you to save her skin by hook or by crook? Further, what exactly are you doing on this forum anyways? Didn't you say you have decided to quit this forum because it is infested with south indians? Did you come back because Tracy asked you to return?

I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Rashmun wrote:would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

michelle2 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

i would not agree, rashmun. our dear admin would approve of anyone posting his/her cooked-up stories on this forum so long as s/he was equipped with The Thing - he always naively thought that people who are so equipped are angels - or s/he constantly applied the vacuum to him. there are even people here who made peace with poopah711 to please the admin. i miss our dear admin.

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Kinnera reminds me of Julius Caesar in her choice of friends and confidantes.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Let me sleep over it.

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Kinnera wrote:I think this Rashmun fella should be kicked out of the forum.

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Kinnera reminds me of Julius Caesar in her choice of friends and confidantes.

Mine are better than the gossipers club that you maintain. Puke!

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

Rashmun wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

SomeProfile wrote:

Doucheman should be ignored and never replied to on any thread. That is the better way to handle him, that is the only way to handle him. Kicking him out of the forum is too much of a kind gesture for him.

I have already advised a few times before that Doucheman should be ignored. People started doing that in the non-personal threads he started. People did not engage with him even when he posted threads critical of Congress and supportive of BJP. That is why he got frustrated and started this personal thread. He knew that if he continued with the non-personal threads, he would continue to be ignored.

So, new advice to everyone: personal thread or non-personal thread, please ignore Doucheman and don't reply to him.

Very good advice, SP. Others have been advising the same too and i too strongly believe the same. Yup, will ignore this moron soon.

Kinnera reminds me of Julius Caesar in her choice of friends and confidantes.

Mine are better than the gossipers club that you maintain. Puke!

Do you know what Julius Caesar's friends and confidantes did to him?

madrasi_idiot wrote:shouldn't i WHAT? tracy is my mistress who i screw every time i travel to providence wherever to visit bittu, on a pretext of course, because she is bittu's neighbour. your point?

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

i would not agree, rashmun. our dear admin would approve of anyone posting his/her cooked-up stories on this forum so long as s/he was equipped with The Thing - he always naively thought that people who are so equipped are angels - or s/he constantly applied the vacuum to him. there are even people here who made peace with poopah711 to please the admin. i miss our dear admin.

going by the same logic that he applies to others, michelle2 is sucking up to Rashmun because Rashmun claims to be a northindian and a brahmin

michelle2 wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

i would not agree, rashmun. our dear admin would approve of anyone posting his/her cooked-up stories on this forum so long as s/he was equipped with The Thing - he always naively thought that people who are so equipped are angels - or s/he constantly applied the vacuum to him. there are even people here who made peace with poopah711 to please the admin. i miss our dear admin.

going by the same logic that he applies to others, michelle2 is sucking up to Rashmun because Rashmun claims to be a northindian and a brahmin

i don't remember staying up all night to convince bittu singh fobby to (literally) brush his teeth before going to bed, only so that you could have a conversation with, and the attention of a northindian, when he has nothing but contempt for you because you are a telugu.

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Rashmun wrote:would you agree that the admin would not approve of you posting your cooked up stories on this forum? don't you value your friendship with him?

i would not agree, rashmun. our dear admin would approve of anyone posting his/her cooked-up stories on this forum so long as s/he was equipped with The Thing - he always naively thought that people who are so equipped are angels - or s/he constantly applied the vacuum to him. there are even people here who made peace with poopah711 to please the admin. i miss our dear admin.

going by the same logic that he applies to others, michelle2 is sucking up to Rashmun because Rashmun claims to be a northindian and a brahmin

i don't remember staying up all night to convince bittu singh fobby to (literally) brush his teeth before going to bed, only so that you could have a conversation with, and the attention of a northindian, when he has nothing but contempt for you because you are a telugu.

haha! you are what your thoughts are. You see the world and others according to what your thought process is.  Thank god i don't think like you.

Yeah, suck up to the northindians brahmin Rashmun. That's what a dark southindian is supposed to be doing, according to you, no?

** this forum is littered with evidence that that's what you do, habitually, routinely.

and of course, you are one dark southindian.

** of course, and i like being what i am.

michelle2 wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

Kinnera wrote:

michelle2 wrote:

i would not agree, rashmun. our dear admin would approve of anyone posting his/her cooked-up stories on this forum so long as s/he was equipped with The Thing - he always naively thought that people who are so equipped are angels - or s/he constantly applied the vacuum to him. there are even people here who made peace with poopah711 to please the admin. i miss our dear admin.

going by the same logic that he applies to others, michelle2 is sucking up to Rashmun because Rashmun claims to be a northindian and a brahmin

i don't remember staying up all night to convince bittu singh fobby to (literally) brush his teeth before going to bed, only so that you could have a conversation with, and the attention of a northindian, when he has nothing but contempt for you because you are a telugu.

haha! you are what your thoughts are. You see the world and others according to what your thought process is.  Thank god i don't think like you.

Yeah, suck up to the northindians brahmin Rashmun. That's what a dark southindian is supposed to be doing, according to you, no?

** this forum is littered with evidence that that's what you do, habitually, routinely.

and of course, you are one dark southindian.

** of course, and i like being what i am.

see ** above for my responses.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:you know what. a story is coming up the moment I get enough time to type one.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:you know what. a story is coming up the moment I get enough time to type one.

b_A wrote:Wow! Just wow!
So, the fictitious telugu boyfriend was never created.
The photo sharing episode never happened.
All that one needs is the gumption, no strike that, the chutzpah to whitewash the facts and a helpful friend whose idol in life is the candle - the one that melts away its life to give light to its owner.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:

b_A wrote:Wow! Just wow!
So, the fictitious telugu boyfriend was never created.
The photo sharing episode never happened.
All that one needs is the gumption, no strike that, the chutzpah to whitewash the facts and a helpful friend whose idol in life is the candle - the one that melts away its life to give light to its owner.

omg what fictitious telugu boyfriend are you talking about? This one is such a bouncer to me. Can you care to explain? I did not have a fake telugu boyfriend.

Beatrix Kiddo wrote:oh rashmun. you are only correct about the fake bf part. dunno how you do it.

b_A wrote:Wow! Just wow!
So, the fictitious telugu boyfriend was never created.
The photo sharing episode never happened.
All that one needs is the gumption, no strike that, the chutzpah to whitewash the facts and a helpful friend whose idol in life is the candle - the one that melts away its life to give light to its owner.